Page 41 of 123 FirstFirst ... 3139404142435191 ... LastLast
Results 401 to 410 of 1229

Thread: Scalia Wonders If Same-Sex Parents ‘Harmful’ To Children

  1. #401
    Sage

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Last Seen
    09-24-17 @ 04:38 AM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    29,261

    Re: Scalia Wonders If Same-Sex Parents ‘Harmful’ To Children

    Quote Originally Posted by humbolt View Post
    Sure you can, when you get done baiting.
    No baiting involved you claimed

    Quote Originally Posted by humbolt View Post
    in this case has very real physical consequences.
    Now can you back up your claim or not.

  2. #402
    Sage


    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    SW Virginia
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 10:13 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    18,266

    Re: Scalia Wonders If Same-Sex Parents ‘Harmful’ To Children

    Quote Originally Posted by winston53660 View Post
    No baiting involved you claimed



    Now can you back up your claim or not.
    There's no backup required. It's reality. Homosexuals do not procreate. And I need not back up my claim. Or not. When all else fails, try a little common sense. The claim has been that homosexuals make good parents. I don't dispute that. I'm merely pointing out that historically they have not had much of an opportunity to demonstrate it, and thus lack a significant track record to validate the claim.

  3. #403
    Sage
    Somerville's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    On an island. Not that one!
    Last Seen
    Today @ 12:45 AM
    Lean
    Socialist
    Posts
    9,824

    Re: Scalia Wonders If Same-Sex Parents ‘Harmful’ To Children

    Quote Originally Posted by Jerry View Post
    Whites could marry other races,just not blacks specifically, and other races could marry without limit. The restriction shot down by Loving v. Virginia was specifically about blacks and whites. No other races. Whites could still marry Latinos if they wanted...just not blacks.

    That's why that ban was struck down.

    If the restriction were broad, requiring both parties to be of the same race in order to marry, regardless of the race, the law would likely have stood.

    You might wish to restate this post, as there were laws against other than 'Africans' being allowed to marry white folks.
    Anti-miscegenation laws in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    South Carolina, Texas and Virginia didn't allow any marriage between those of European and non-European origin until after the Loving decision

    North Carolina and Tennessee said whites couldn't marry blacks or native Americans until Loving negated those laws.
    “And I have no doubt that every new example will succeed, as every past one has done, in shewing that religion & Govt will both exist in greater purity, the less they are mixed together.”
    ~ James Madison, letter to Edward Livingston, July 10, 1822

  4. #404
    Sage

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Last Seen
    09-24-17 @ 04:38 AM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    29,261

    Re: Scalia Wonders If Same-Sex Parents ‘Harmful’ To Children

    Quote Originally Posted by humbolt View Post
    There's no backup required. It's reality. Homosexuals do not procreate. And I need not back up my claim. Or not. When all else fails, try a little common sense. The claim has been that homosexuals make good parents. I don't dispute that. I'm merely pointing out that historically they have not had much of an opportunity to demonstrate it, and thus lack a significant track record to validate the claim.
    Thats not what you claimed.

  5. #405
    Sage


    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    SW Virginia
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 10:13 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    18,266

    Re: Scalia Wonders If Same-Sex Parents ‘Harmful’ To Children

    Quote Originally Posted by winston53660 View Post
    Thats not what you claimed.
    It's precisely what I claimed. If you have something to say in this regard, say it. Otherwise...

  6. #406
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Last Seen
    08-29-17 @ 09:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Left
    Posts
    16,575

    Re: Scalia Wonders If Same-Sex Parents ‘Harmful’ To Children

    Quote Originally Posted by tech30528 View Post
    The argument of what is best for the children is lost on the left. Any group that has no problem killing babies certainly can not be expected to consider their best interests ahead of selfish interests. A child to a gay couple falls somewhere between a social experiment and one of those little dogs people carry around in a bag. It's just another way to say "Look at us! We're special!" The "parents" wouldn't have a clue as to how screwed up the child ends up viewed from their own perspective. In fact the the more extreme the deviation from the norm the larger the victory as any departure from the norm is considered progress regardless of direction.
    You falsely assume all gays are Pro-choice. I know quite a few that are Pro-life. Yet more stupid rhetoric from a conservative that doesn't understand gays.

    It's nice to see the homophobes come out of the woodwork on this issue though. And no, not all conservatives against SSM are homophobes, but in this case yes, you have shown you are one.

  7. #407
    Sage
    Somerville's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    On an island. Not that one!
    Last Seen
    Today @ 12:45 AM
    Lean
    Socialist
    Posts
    9,824

    Re: Scalia Wonders If Same-Sex Parents ‘Harmful’ To Children

    The argument of what is best for the children is lost on the right. Any group that has no problem allowing children to starve certainly can not be expected to consider their best interests ahead of selfish interests. A child to a hetero couple falls somewhere between a social requirement and one of those little dogs people carry around in a bag. It's just another way to say "Look at us! We're special!" Many parents don't have a clue as to how screwed up a child may end up as they are too involved with their own 'adult' problems. In fact the more extreme the deviation from the expected outcome for a hetero family, the more likely it is that their friends will deny the problems. The closer some families return to the standards of the 19th Century, the greater their victory as any departure from the norm is considered progress regardless of direction.


    I changed a few words
    “And I have no doubt that every new example will succeed, as every past one has done, in shewing that religion & Govt will both exist in greater purity, the less they are mixed together.”
    ~ James Madison, letter to Edward Livingston, July 10, 1822

  8. #408
    User
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Last Seen
    03-28-13 @ 10:43 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    1

    Re: Scalia Wonders If Same-Sex Parents ‘Harmful’ To Children

    The argument of what is best for the children is lost on the left. Any group that has no problem killing babies certainly can not be expected to consider their best interests ahead of selfish interests. A child to a gay couple falls somewhere between a social experiment and one of those little dogs people carry around in a bag. It's just another way to say "Look at us! We're special!" The "parents" wouldn't have a clue as to how screwed up the child ends up viewed from their own perspective. In fact the the more extreme the deviation from the norm the larger the victory as any departure from the norm is considered progress regardless of direction.
    Perhaps the children of same sex marriage families would be better off if you didn't refer to them as an experiment. I don't see them as experiments or dogs, I see them as person(s) adopting children.

  9. #409
    Sage
    Arbo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Colorado
    Last Seen
    07-12-16 @ 01:32 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    10,395
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Scalia Wonders If Same-Sex Parents ‘Harmful’ To Children

    Quote Originally Posted by tech30528 View Post
    The argument of what is best for the children is lost on the left. Any group that has no problem killing babies certainly can not be expected to consider their best interests ahead of selfish interests. A child to a gay couple falls somewhere between a social experiment and one of those little dogs people carry around in a bag. It's just another way to say "Look at us! We're special!" The "parents" wouldn't have a clue as to how screwed up the child ends up viewed from their own perspective. In fact the the more extreme the deviation from the norm the larger the victory as any departure from the norm is considered progress regardless of direction.
    An amazing amount of ignorance in the above post. First, your general paintbrush of those that do not have the bigoted view that kids raised by SS couples are a problem as 'on the left'. I am far from the left, and I realize through being a parent, knowing SS couples that have raised outstanding kids, and reading the real (and unbiased) studies, that there is no issue with kids being raised by SS couples. No more than kids that are raised by OS couples. Again, its insane views like expressed in the above post that is why 'the right' keeps losing elections and losing ground. This strange adherence to a book that is a work of fiction, rather than standing up for freedom and equality in this nation. Selective following of Constitution, when it fits their beliefs, makes the right and the left two peas in a pod.
    Last edited by Arbo; 03-28-13 at 10:44 AM.
    "nah i think the way cons want to turn this into a political issue is funny though" - Philly Boss

  10. #410
    free market communist
    Gardener's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Last Seen
    09-30-17 @ 12:27 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    26,661

    Re: Scalia Wonders If Same-Sex Parents ‘Harmful’ To Children

    Quote Originally Posted by head of joaquin View Post
    The obvious truth that homosexuality is a birth defect?

    BWHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!

    You have to love the inventiveness of homophobes.
    Some of the most inventive I have found are those homophobes who advertise themselves as looking for sex slaves, and who wish to indulge in any manner of extreme sexual practices. They are known to project their unease over their own twisted sexuality upon others, and so try to portray gay people as having a birth defect so as to distract away from their own weird sexuality.
    "you're better off on Stormfront discussing how evil brown men are taking innocent white flowers." Infinite Chaos

Page 41 of 123 FirstFirst ... 3139404142435191 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •