Page 11 of 18 FirstFirst ... 910111213 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 110 of 179

Thread: Rand Paul All Right With 'Neutral' Federal Gay Marriage Law

  1. #101
    Gradualist

    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Last Seen
    09-25-17 @ 12:48 PM
    Lean
    Socialist
    Posts
    34,949
    Blog Entries
    6

    Re: Rand Paul All Right With 'Neutral' Federal Gay Marriage Law

    Quote Originally Posted by Rocketman View Post
    God is on my side opinionated one. Homsexuality is nothing more than sexual preference and has nothing to do with bigotry.
    But calling them "chemically imbalanced" certainly is.
    Keep on oppressing peoples rights, real "libertarian" of you, and keep on having "God" on your side


  2. #102
    Gradualist

    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Last Seen
    09-25-17 @ 12:48 PM
    Lean
    Socialist
    Posts
    34,949
    Blog Entries
    6

    Re: Rand Paul All Right With 'Neutral' Federal Gay Marriage Law

    Quote Originally Posted by Perotista View Post
    I was married in Thailand at a Buddhist Wat, but I had my marriage certificate translated at JUSMAGTHAI SJA and the military recognized it as I went through the proper military channels to get their approval to marry. It wouldn’t have bothered me if my home state of Georgia recognized it or not. I love my wife.
    Big problem here tho is every state you go to recognizes your marriage.

    You seem more interest in benefits than love.
    Im interested in equality.


  3. #103
    Educator
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Last Seen
    10-20-13 @ 10:54 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    675

    Re: Rand Paul All Right With 'Neutral' Federal Gay Marriage Law

    Quote Originally Posted by TheDemSocialist View Post
    Big problem here tho is every state you go to recognizes your marriage.


    Im interested in equality.
    So, you would have no problem with multiple spouses. Another question comes to mind. If we are nothing but the product of evolutionary accidents then we are on par with all mammals sexually. Therefore, it would seen reasonable that the 'age of consent' would be at puberty. After all, the primary purpose of sex is procreation.

  4. #104
    Gradualist

    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Last Seen
    09-25-17 @ 12:48 PM
    Lean
    Socialist
    Posts
    34,949
    Blog Entries
    6

    Re: Rand Paul All Right With 'Neutral' Federal Gay Marriage Law

    Quote Originally Posted by hfd View Post
    So, you would have no problem with multiple spouses.
    How did you get that out of my comment?

    If we are nothing but the product of evolutionary accidents then we are on par with all mammals sexually. Therefore, it would seen reasonable that the 'age of consent' would be at puberty. After all, the primary purpose of sex is procreation.
    Why are we talking about this with marriage?


  5. #105
    Sage
    Perotista's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Georgia
    Last Seen
    Today @ 09:32 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    17,943
    Blog Entries
    25

    Re: Rand Paul All Right With 'Neutral' Federal Gay Marriage Law

    Quote Originally Posted by TheDemSocialist View Post
    Big problem here tho is every state you go to recognizes your marriage.


    Im interested in equality.
    You conveniently left my oldest daughter out of this. I have no problem with marriage being decided or defined by the states. Marriage is not something to regulated by the federal government.
    This Reform Party member thinks it is high past time that we start electing Americans to congress and the presidency who put America first and their political party further down the line. But for way too long we have been electing Republicans and Democrats who happen to be Americans instead of Americans who happen to be Republicans and Democrats.

  6. #106
    Gradualist

    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Last Seen
    09-25-17 @ 12:48 PM
    Lean
    Socialist
    Posts
    34,949
    Blog Entries
    6

    Re: Rand Paul All Right With 'Neutral' Federal Gay Marriage Law

    Quote Originally Posted by Perotista View Post
    You conveniently left my oldest daughter out of this. I have no problem with marriage being decided or defined by the states. Marriage is not something to regulated by the federal government.
    Even if the states discriminate against them because they are homosexuals? Even if the states pass laws that discriminate on them? Even if we are no equal? I have a huge problem with that.


  7. #107
    Educator
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Last Seen
    10-20-13 @ 10:54 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    675

    Re: Rand Paul All Right With 'Neutral' Federal Gay Marriage Law

    Quote Originally Posted by TheDemSocialist View Post
    How did you get that out of my comment?



    Why are we talking about this with marriage?
    Both issues in my response deals with a form of marraige. You stated you are for equality.

  8. #108
    Gradualist

    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Last Seen
    09-25-17 @ 12:48 PM
    Lean
    Socialist
    Posts
    34,949
    Blog Entries
    6

    Re: Rand Paul All Right With 'Neutral' Federal Gay Marriage Law

    Quote Originally Posted by hfd View Post
    Both issues in my response deals with a form of marraige. You stated you are for equality.
    No they do not. They had to deal with age of consent, evolution, and religious arguments.


  9. #109
    cookies crumble
    ARealConservative's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last Seen
    04-21-17 @ 09:41 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    14,518

    Re: Rand Paul All Right With 'Neutral' Federal Gay Marriage Law

    Quote Originally Posted by iguanaman View Post
    Taboo because that behavior causes harm and/or violates the rights of others. Anything else is discrimination.
    what harm do thoughts cause?

    we are talking about humans and what they perceive as attractive, not human actions.

  10. #110
    Educator
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Last Seen
    10-20-13 @ 10:54 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    675

    Re: Rand Paul All Right With 'Neutral' Federal Gay Marriage Law

    Quote Originally Posted by TheDemSocialist View Post
    No they do not. They had to deal with age of consent, evolution, and religious arguments.
    And marraige. Evidently forms of marriage you don't support. If so, why not? Is SSM not a religious argument at least on one side of the issue?

Page 11 of 18 FirstFirst ... 910111213 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •