• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Senator Rand Paul's Epic Filibuster: Reads 'Alice in Wonderland'

You grew up here? What does that mean? How does the fact you grew up here have anything to do with the topic?

I know what kind of people live here...............
 
Do actually believe that crock you just spewed? I trust Rand Paul no further than I can see him.......................

Yet you trust Obama implicitly as he and his cronies continue to dodge and weave around simple straightforward questions, unwilling to recognize the limits placed upon their power by the Constitution.

Just further proof that most people who support Obama have been brainwashed into a cult.
 
Yet you trust Obama implicitly as he and his cronies continue to dodge and weave around simple straightforward questions, unwilling to recognize the limits placed upon their power by the Constitution.

Just further proof that most people who support Obama have been brainwashed into a cult.

Right. Because I have never criticized Obama.........................LOL........................
 
Backstabbing creeps, since you asked...............

Backstabbing is a worldwide problem and pays no attention to your location on the earth. Regardless, what does that have to do with Paul?
 
I do respect the freedoms that many do not, and is why I'm against the drone strikes on american ground. This does not mean I'm ok with the method that is being taken. But Rand Paul said he would not stop speaking until this is understood from coast to coast. Now I'm dont dislike or like Rand Paul, just wondering how far can he go representing how much congress fights for the ideas they believe in, no matter how much the rest of the country will hate the few corrupt, and not take responsibility for their choices, that has made this country what it is today.
 
Backstabbing is a worldwide problem and pays no attention to your location on the earth. Regardless, what does that have to do with Paul?

He is what a woman from Scotland I used to know would call a paper a-hole.....................
 
He is what a woman from Scotland I used to know would call a paper a-hole.....................

I'm not really familiar with that term. How are you using it?
 
I'm not really familiar with that term. How are you using it?

You've heard of someone described as a "paper tiger", well, he's a "paper a-hole"..............................
 
Good on Rand Paul on his stance and bringing back Mr. Smith.
 
You've heard of someone described as a "paper tiger", well, he's a "paper a-hole"..............................

No, I haven't heard that either. :3oops: If I understand it enough after a google search you mean to call him weak??
 
Good on Rand Paul on his stance and bringing back Mr. Smith.

You're kidding .................He's gone for the totally stupid...............
 
No, I haven't heard that either. :3oops: If I understand it enough after a google search you mean to call him weak??

Ok. You get it....................
 
Right. Because I have never criticized Obama.........................LOL........................

So you've criticized Obama before .. big whoop

If you had a spine you'd be supporting Rand Paul here. He's in the right. Instead like a good little regressive you fall back in goose step with Obama and you're trying to make this about Paul. Objectification, polarization, the same tired cliche tactics time and again the left engages in.

You're telling us we can't trust Rand Paul who is merely trying to have the WH clarify what their position on drones are in regards to killing American citizens on domestic soil. Sorry, your position simply isn't credible and to be taken seriously. The burden of proof is on President Obama to clarify what the LIMITS on his power are.

The country needs a definitive answer from the WH about this
 
So you've criticized Obama before .. big whoop

If you had a spine you'd be supporting Rand Paul here. He's in the right. Instead like a good little regressive you fall back in goose step with Obama and you're trying to make this about Paul. Objectification, polarization, the same tired cliche tactics time and again the left engages in.

You're telling us we can't trust Rand Paul who is merely trying to have the WH clarify what their position on drones are in regards to killing American citizens on domestic soil. Sorry, your position simply isn't credible and to be taken seriously. The burden of proof is on President Obama to clarify what the LIMITS on his power are.

The country needs a definitive answer from the WH about this

Wrong. It doesn't matter whether he is right or wrong. He's so completely discredited himself and bankrupted himself that I would rather be "wrong", that's how bogus Ron Paul is...................
 
This is actually what I posted up on my facebook feed. Normally don't get political but this is a rather impressive situation (12 hours and counting)...

Wow. Whatever your thought about Rand Paul, his other stances, or this particular stance...this filibuster is impressive. For years, both when the Republicans had it in and the Democrats had it, one party or another has been complaining about how easy it is to just say "Filibuster" without actually doing it in the old fashioned way. Well...Rand Paul is basically pulling a "Mr. Smith Goes to Washington". He's going on 12 plus hours now of holding the Floor and fighting for his case and views in an old fashion, talk until you drop, style of filibuster.

CSPAN is actually suddenly interesting TV.

Go Rand Go.
 
Do actually believe that crock you just spewed? I trust Rand Paul no further than I can see him.......................

And you trust a president who went back on his word and signed the ndaa?
 
Wrong. It doesn't matter whether he is right or wrong. He's so completely discredited himself and bankrupted himself that I would rather be "wrong", that's how bogus Ron Paul is...................

So you admit to taking the wrong side of the issue (or at least be willing to be wrong) as long as it meant not being on the same side as a man you usually disagree with. Immature at best. Absolutely immoral at worst.
 
And you trust a president who went back on his word and signed the ndaa?

I've lived thru Carter, Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Bush II--------------If you think Obama is a lieing sack of schit, look at the previous dogs................
 
So you admit to taking the wrong side of the issue (or at least be willing to be wrong) as long as it meant not being on the same side as a man you usually disagree with. Immature at best. Absolutely immoral at worst.

I'm not a Xtian, of course I'm capable of utter immorality...............What don't conservatives get about "Jesus is skata to me" ?..................
 
Wrong. It doesn't matter whether he is right or wrong. He's so completely discredited himself and bankrupted himself that I would rather be "wrong", that's how bogus Ron Paul is...................

Wow. So basically you are willing to be wrong so you don't find yourself siding with Paul.

Btw, Ron is his father.
 
Some one, explain to me why I don't believe him. Oh yeah, cause not one single Republican said one single unkind word about Bush during his tenure.

How many articles of his father do you need to see before recanting this falsehood?
 
I'm not a Xtian, of course I'm capable of utter immorality...............What don't conservatives get about "Jesus is skata to me" ?..................

No one said anything about Christianity. Morality is not simply a religious issue.
 
Back
Top Bottom