You know the time is right to take control, we gotta take offense against the status quo
Originally Posted by A. de Tocqueville
I'm not an atheist, but I still think it's wrong to have different rules for different genders. What religion are you that doesn't teach that? Not Christian, that's for sure.
One factor here. If the story is true, the woman was fired for violating her signed contract to not engage while employed by the school. Nothing about prior acts. While the contract seems to me silly, it is nevertheless a contract. Her now husband did not violate that contract in that he was not so employed and was married at the time of the job solicitation.
From my personal standpoint, the whole argument is ridiculous on both sides.
He's not denying it. Besides, if he's the father, it proves that he had sex with her. Unless it's some sort of miracle.her saying "i had sex with that guy" isn't the same level of proof that someone was having sex as "I am pregnant".
"If I take death into my life, acknowledge it, and face it squarely, I will free myself from the anxiety of death and the pettiness of life - and only then will I be free to become myself." ~ Martin Heidegger
The obvious question to ask her was "were they aware of this" and was it something "he was open with them about". Because they were aware that she was pregnant, and you can't really deny having sex after such is establishedEven though he acknowledges it.
Which says **** all about what they knew and didn't know.A simple paternity test would prove that he had sex with her.