I gave reasons my why UAVs aren't a bad idea, and you deflected to a Pavlovian default response.
And now you're being defensive, and throwing out subtle insults instead of "formulating a coherent response". It's convenient is all. You can't come up with a reason against the utilization of UAVs without making long raving monologue, and when somebody does walk into your little trap, you run and hide behind the founding fathers, and how you apparently love them more.
I would have accepted that it poses a threat to the Fourth Amendment, I would have also accepted an argument on the more utilitarian qualities of helicopters and the availability of an actual helicopter crew s a machine that can't offer immediate aid and support to search and rescue missions, and I'm sure there are many more arguments to be made by people who actually want a real discussion about where the UAV fits into the civilian world, but you didn't argue any of that. You ranted, raved, and copped out.
The UAV will be implemented, discussion of how they're used now decides how far they can go, and what necessary limitations are placed on them. If you want to live in the stone age, and pretend it isn't happening, go ahead, but don't talk down to me as though your participation here was so amazing.