• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Texas bans shooting immigrants from helicopters

If your family was dying of starvation and you knew the only way you could get them food was to go to another country illegally to earn some money, your view on whether it was justified might be a little different. If you haven't seen "Under the Same Moon", you may want to see this preview:



Oh my God.....here we go......


The truth too much for you sport?
 
The truth too much for you sport?

That would be truther conspiracy theories, sport.

I'll pass on your purple Koolaid.
 
Yeah. Only in America would something like this be outlawed.

Police murdering unidentified people? No, I think that's banned in most places, actually.
 
My problem with shooting illegal immigrants is the same as shooting anyone who does not represent a threat to others. AlQuida leaders are dangerous people planning to kill Americans (and maybe Canadians) and can be taken out with minimal risk to American ground troops by using a drone. Good shooting Obama. Shooting unarmed guys in the back of a pick up truck is just poor form. There is a bit of a difference.
So, your point is what? You said shooting people from a helicopter was obviously bad but your both not okay with drone killings or you are okay with drone killings, you just won't say. Slamming Texas is a great American liberal passtime but challenging a liberal President is impossible. It really is interesting watching an Obama supporter twist out of shape trying not to say anything bad about their hero.
 
If your family was dying of starvation and you knew the only way you could get them food was to go to another country illegally to earn some money, your view on whether it was justified might be a little different. If you haven't seen "Under the Same Moon", you may want to see this preview:

Lets see, there are around 7 Billion people in the world. Somewhere around a Billion, maybe a billion and a half, don't live in abject poverty. So, about 5.5 Billion or more live in conditions that would make what the poor and welfare recipients in the US live in look like a middle to upper middle class life style. Sorry, but we cannot take in all 5.5 Billion of them, where would we put them?
 
Texas?
Lets see, there are around 7 Billion people in the world. Somewhere around a Billion, maybe a billion and a half, don't live in abject poverty. So, about 5.5 Billion or more live in conditions that would make what the poor and welfare recipients in the US live in look like a middle to upper middle class life style. Sorry, but we cannot take in all 5.5 Billion of them, where would we put them?
 
My problem with shooting illegal immigrants is the same as shooting anyone who does not represent a threat to others. AlQuida leaders are dangerous people planning to kill Americans (and maybe Canadians) and can be taken out with minimal risk to American ground troops by using a drone. Good shooting Obama. Shooting unarmed guys in the back of a pick up truck is just poor form. There is a bit of a difference.

That's all nice to say, but that's not what happened here -

A Texas state trooper who fired on a pickup truck from a helicopter and killed two illegal immigrants during a chase through the desert was trying to disable the vehicle and suspected it was being used to smuggle drugs, authorities said Friday.

The disclosure came a day after the incident that left two Guatemalan nationals dead on an isolated gravel road near the town of La Joya, just north of the Mexico border.

State game wardens were the first to encounter the truck Thursday. After the driver refused to stop, they radioed for help and state police responded, according to Parks and Wildlife Department spokesman Mike Cox.

When the helicopter with a sharpshooter arrived, officers concluded that the truck appeared to be carrying a "typical covered drug load" on its bed and was travelling at reckless speeds, police said.

After the shots were fired and the truck's tires blown out, the driver lost control and crashed into a ditch. State police said a preliminary investigation revealed that the shots fired from the helicopter struck the vehicle's occupants.

Eight people who were in the truck were arrested. At least seven of them were also from Guatemala. No drugs were found.

The police weren't shooting at the people for one. Another thing, that truck could have been carrying anything from drugs to arms that makes these smugglers dangerous people.
 
I was just thinking, first the government said we cant ride manatees, now we cant shoot mexicans from helicopters. What next?
 
If your family was dying of starvation and you knew the only way you could get them food was to go to another country illegally to earn some money, your view on whether it was justified might be a little different. If you haven't seen "Under the Same Moon", you may want to see this preview:



Oh my God.....here we go......


The truth too much for you sport?


That would be truther conspiracy theories, sport.


There's nothing theoretical about the picture presented in the preview above. Did you even look at it? Answers.com has a good explanation of the types of jobs illegal immigrants take and why as well:
US Illegal Immigration Explained - Profits and Poverty, Social Security and Starvation

Also, in case you'd like to see a documentary instead of a fictional narrative based on truths, speaking of the brutal conditions illegal immigrants must face just to become an illegal immigrant, I recommend you watch the following video of a man who actually decided to weather it all with 4 immigrants making the crossing:
Watch Mojados, the Mexican Documentary by Tommy Davis
 
I was just thinking, first the government said we cant ride manatees, now we cant shoot mexicans from helicopters. What next?

Reported, that's clearly a Rule 18 violation.
 
Wow? what is rule number 18?

From Rules:
***
18. Hate Messages - Hate Messages delivered via threads, posts, signatures, or PM's are forbidden at Debate Politics. The Moderator Team defines a hate message as any willful wording intended to ridicule, debase, degrade, intimidate, or incite violence and/or prejudicial actions against a group of people based on their race, gender (including transgendered), ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, or disability. Determined violations of this rule will be subject to incur an immediate revocation of membership. Posting links to any website deemed by the Moderator Team to contain hate messages will also constitute a violation of Rule 18.
***
 
I was just thinking, first the government said we cant ride manatees, now we cant shoot mexicans from helicopters. What next?

No smoking at the border. Second hand smoke kills illegal immigrants.
 
My problem with shooting illegal immigrants is the same as shooting anyone who does not represent a threat to others. AlQuida leaders are dangerous people planning to kill Americans (and maybe Canadians) and can be taken out with minimal risk to American ground troops by using a drone. Good shooting Obama. Shooting unarmed guys in the back of a pick up truck is just poor form. There is a bit of a difference.

Really? A big difference? How do you know the guys illegally entering your country in the back of a pickup truck aren't members of Al Quida? The difference, from my perspective, is that the drone attacks are happening in countries most Americans couldn't find on a map and are killing people most Americans identify as dangerous and not like them, even though some of them are actually American citizens. Bring the drone attacks closer to home and all hell would break loose.

Where there is no difference is in shooting indescriminately from the sky from a drone or from a helicopter - to suggest otherwise, is dishonest.
 
There's nothing theoretical about the picture presented in the preview above. Did you even look at it? Answers.com has a good explanation of the types of jobs illegal immigrants take and why as well:
US Illegal Immigration Explained - Profits and Poverty, Social Security and Starvation

Also, in case you'd like to see a documentary instead of a fictional narrative based on truths, speaking of the brutal conditions illegal immigrants must face just to become an illegal immigrant, I recommend you watch the following video of a man who actually decided to weather it all with 4 immigrants making the crossing:
Watch Mojados, the Mexican Documentary by Tommy Davis

And what does any of that matter here? You have it terribly bad in your own country so it's okay to break into another's country? We already have our own hard luck stories and folks born to poverty to deal with.
 
No it's not. Turn on your sarcasm detector and lighten up.

I think it's pushing sarcasm beyond where it should go. Would that type of "sarcasm" be tolerated if jews or americans were the target?
 
I think it's pushing sarcasm beyond where it should go. Would that type of "sarcasm" be tolerated if jews or americans were the target?

We're not allowed to shoot jews from helicopters either?
 
Really? A big difference? How do you know the guys illegally entering your country in the back of a pickup truck aren't members of Al Quida? The difference, from my perspective, is that the drone attacks are happening in countries most Americans couldn't find on a map and are killing people most Americans identify as dangerous and not like them, even though some of them are actually American citizens. Bring the drone attacks closer to home and all hell would break loose.

Where there is no difference is in shooting indescriminately from the sky from a drone or from a helicopter - to suggest otherwise, is dishonest.

So as a civilian in a helicopter, how would you know?
 
Back
Top Bottom