And you claim it's massively overstated because . . . You deny the science.In any case, no one's "denied" anything. While I do feel that the "threat" posed by Global Warming tends to be massively overstated, anyone with even a cursory knowledge of geology knows that global temperatures have been gradually rising over the last several centuries.
Thanks for playing.
Hmmm, who here really, truly, believes the poll takers didn't know the result of the poll BEFORE they took it? I've got a bridge you might be interested in if so.
And don't you all know, we're done with dealing with pollution, it's CO2 we're concerned with now. It allows the industries to frack and pollute all they want, as long as they keep their CO2 profile looking good for the dog and pony show. If you've ever been to LA in the summer decades ago and more recently you'd see it's not gotten better, but thanks to California's CO2 standards they do emit less CO2. Oh boy, problem being solved, yes indeed.
I think in the future this is the only phrase conservatives will ever say. It represents the entirety of the ideological and semantic system, and it's the only "argument" they can make in light of the facts that totally debunk their claims.
Meanwhile science marches forward without them.
Silly. Of course politicians commission polls to highlight their causes. If the POTUS were a republican you'd have been the first to point that out.
Science may be marching forward, but it's doing so without any "help" from you or the rest of the cult.
The Failure of Emissions Trading: The Twilight of European Climate Leadership, Part II
Issues in Emissions Trading - University College Dublin
I claim it's massively overstated because... It's massively overstated.And you claim it's massively overstated because . . . You deny the science.
Thanks for playing.
According to "the science" (whatever that means), not only are the antarctic icesheets not melting at anywhere near the rates various alarmists have claimed in the past, but the supposed "consensus" that today's climate is unusually warm is verifiably false, with temperatures actually being far warmer during the Roman and Medieval periods than today.
I'm sorry, but vague claims of doom and destruction that aren't predicted to come into play for another couple of hundred years (if they ever come into play at all) and vague theories based off of bald-faced assumptions and a general lack of longterm data really isn't enough hard evidence on which to base a panic enduced restructure of our entire society. Get a grip, grow a sense of rational skepticism, and wise up to the fact that you're being manipulated to serve someone else's agenda.
Last edited by Gathomas88; 02-14-13 at 07:33 PM.