• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Voter Fraud That ‘Never Happens’ Keeps Coming Back

Wayno said:
Like Popeye, I am what I am......

Sorry if the fact that The New York Times is a public relations vehicle for the Democrat Party upsets you......
Click to expand...

You're the one who's upset that the fact that Fox was created to be a PR vehicle for the Republicans.
 
Dickieboy said:
? can YOU determine with certainty that one who produces court documents, birth certificate, or social security check is the in fact the one on said documents? If so how, without a photo?
Click to expand...

? How did you get your first photo ID?
 
rocket88 said:
You're the one who's upset that the fact that Fox was created to be a PR vehicle for the Republicans.
Click to expand...

Actually, I'm FAR from upset......

I'm here getting my daily dose of humor, studying the ignorance that passes for intelligence in much of the Liberal community.........

Keeps me in stitches all day............
 
BWG said:
No you don't


From Massachusetts...

Myth: You need a photo ID to get SNAP/Food Stamps.

Fact: You need proof of identity. A photo ID is one way to prove identity. You can’t be turned down for SNAP/Food Stamps benefits because you don’t have photo ID. You can use another ID like a work or school badge, a health benefits card, an ID from another social service, a pay stub, a birth certificate, or a voter registration card. The SNAP/Food Stamps worker can also check your identity by calling shelter workers or employers.



From the GAO...

STATES MAY USE PHOTOGRAPHS ON
THE IDENTIFICATION CARDS BUT, UNDER DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
REGULATIONS, MAY NOT DENY OR DELAY BENEFITS TO HOUSEHOLDS
WHOSE MEMBERS ARE UNWILLING TO BE PHOTOGRAPHED.


From the USDA...

Identity

Driver’s License
Work or school identification card
Health benefits identification card
Voter registration card
Birth certificate


From lawhelp.org

You can't be denied for food stamps simply because you don't have a photo ID.
The Food Stamp caseworker is required to verify your identity. If you are unable to provide a photo ID, there are other ways to verify your identity such as wage stubs, a voter registration card, a birth certificate, or a "collateral contact" such as a homeless shelter case manager.
Click to expand...

So, I guess you're assuming that Food Stamps are the only Government Benefits that are offered........

That would be a big FAIL.....
 
Unitedwestand13 said:
How many years has the drudge report or the daily caller been in the business. The New York time has been in the buissness long before drudge took his first baby steps as a toddler
Click to expand...

So time span of business determines integrity and honesty? LOL
 
HA HA! Ohio Election Official: 'I Voted Twice for Obama'...
 
Aderleth said:
Wait - because you've seen people get arrested at airports, voter ID laws would stop a nonexistent voter impersonation problem? Okay.

Also, are you seriously asserting that the Texas Secretary of STate is a "liberal programmer"?
Click to expand...

Possibly, since you were too lazy to link your material
 
Unitedwestand13 said:
If there was rampant fraud, there would be millions of cases, purpatrated by orginizations with the money and resources to commit such a scheme. No such orginization exists and 19 cases of voter fraud does not equal millions.

Unless you think the entire 2012 election was a case of voter fraud masterminded by barrack Obama and all the orginizations who supported him and all the people who voted for him somehow cheated conservatives of their quote "victory" unqoute
Click to expand...

It was worse than 2008 and that one was pretty bad. Voting in not regulated at all here.
 
Rocketman said:
Possibly, since you were too lazy to link your material
Click to expand...

There's a cite at the bottom of the quote, and the Texas Secretary of State reference is in the quote itself. Did you, perhaps, not read my post very thoroughly? That's pretty lazy of you.
 
Unitedwestand13 said:
No it just means that the New York Times has simply been around longer and that more people recognize the name
Click to expand...

As they do CBS and NBC and know that both are clearly biased in their reporting
 
Aderleth said:
There's a cite at the bottom of the quote, and the Texas Secretary of State reference is in the quote itself. Did you, perhaps, not read my post very thoroughly? That's pretty lazy of you.
Click to expand...

there was no link lazy
 
Unitedwestand13 said:
So both 2008 and 2012 are massive voter fraud cases because... What?
Click to expand...

In ohio, massive vote buyouts, transporting the homeless with promises of free meals, you might as well hand them cash.

Pennsylvania- voter intimindation, sickening that these things are ignored now.
 
I had not heard about the second part. Al Franken got elected to the Senate by felons then allowed ObamaCare to get rammed down real Americans throats? Please explain.
Wayno said:
Obama won the election because incumbant Presidents USUALLY win elections.

Al Franken became a Senator, allowing ObamaCare to be rammed down the throat of the American people, because of felons voting.
Click to expand...
 
Rocketman said:
Critics of voter ID and other laws cracking down on voter fraud claim they’re unnecessary because fraud is nonexistent. For instance, Brennan Center attorneys Michael Waldman and Justin Levitt claimed last year: “A person casting two votes risks jail time and a fine for minimal gain. Proven voter fraud, statistically, happens about as often as death by lightning strike.”

Well, lightning is suddenly all over Cincinnati, Ohio. The Hamilton County Board of Elections is investigating 19 possible cases of alleged voter fraud that occurred when Ohio was a focal point of the 2012 presidential election. A total of 19 voters and nine witnesses are part of the probe.

The Voter Fraud That
Click to expand...

Pssst: this case has nothing to do with voter ID. It has to do with double voting which the system almost always picks up, and which is then a question of intent.

NEXT DISCREDITED RIGHTWING MEME!
 
Rocketman said:
Only mentally challenged people would believe her explanation. If she truly believed the absentee vote did not count she would not have wasted the time to cast it. Voter Fraud has always been unchecked in Ohio.
Click to expand...

I believe its the defense that used by the Romney's associate and GOP operative when he was caught in the vast GOP voter registration fraud scandal in the last election.

GOP voter registration scandal widens - Salon.com
 
head of joaquin said:
Pssst: this case has nothing to do with voter ID. It has to do with double voting which the system almost always picks up, and which is then a question of intent.

NEXT DISCREDITED RIGHTWING MEME!
Click to expand...

And one cannot help but notice that while accusations spring up and we find out that they are "being investigated" precious few of these actually end up in convictions for election or voter fraud. it would be like a person using arrest statistics as evidence of guilt instead of convictions.
 
Rocketman said:
In ohio, massive vote buyouts, transporting the homeless with promises of free meals, you might as well hand them cash.

Pennsylvania- voter intimindation, sickening that these things are ignored now.
Click to expand...

BWHAHHAHHAAH!

Next you'll link to a doctored O'Keefe video about ACORN. You conservatives and your discredited memes. It's as if your supply is endless.

However, check this little puppy out.

GOP voter registration scandal widens - Salon.com
 
rocket88 said:
Um...I live in Minnesota, and I do presume that there are at least 51 criminals.
Click to expand...

No doubt, since it took more than 51 criminals to elect Franken.

Wisconsin, Iowa and North Dakota have no right to tell Minnesota jokes. They do because it hurts the pain of all the people that escaped those states for Minnesota.
Click to expand...

Disagreed. They have every right to joke about the dysfunctional government they left behind.
 
haymarket said:
And one cannot help but notice that while accusations spring up and we find out that they are "being investigated" precious few of these actually end up in convictions for election or voter fraud. it would be like a person using arrest statistics as evidence of guilt instead of convictions.
Click to expand...

LOL..........

So, without presenting a VALID IDENTIFICATION, who are you going to look for?

What's REALLY sad is that Democrats have to endorse fraud in our election process, because they often can't win without it.......

Maybe that's why Obama's nominating Hagel a guy who owns a voting machine company and has a history of "defying the demographic polls" in his elections....

Kinda' like "thank you."
 
Diogenes said:
No doubt, since it took more than 51 criminals to elect Franken.



Disagreed. They have every right to joke about the dysfunctional government they left behind.
Click to expand...

If they're joking about what they left behind, they'd be joking about where they're from, not Minnesota where they chose to live.

If you cancelled out all the criminal votes, the race would have had the same outcome. You know it too, you're just too full of righty fluff to acknowledge anything outside of your "Republicans are perfect" view.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom