• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Voter Fraud That ‘Never Happens’ Keeps Coming Back

rocket88 said:
There is no unbiased media any more than there are unbiased people.
Click to expand...


Gee, what ever happened to those endless stories on Cindy Sheehan, and the constant mentions of the death totals in Iraq and Afghanistan.......

Oh, that's right.

Even though Obama ended the Iraq involvement on the Bush timetable, which never gets mentioned, and had a FAR HIGHER death rate in Afghanistan than Bush EVER did, ANOTHER fact that rarely if ever gets mentioned, since Bush is no longer in office, there's no need be objective when it comes to President Poodle Stew.

Unbiased is one thing.

Being a wholly owned public relations outlet for the Democrat Party is another.
 
rocket88 said:
I don't trust any media to do my thinking for me. Independent thought process - you should try it, it doesn't hurt as much as you think it will.
Click to expand...

Nice fail at spin. Those who take in reports from sources across the spectrum, do a bit of their own research, and think independently do not need to use terms like 'fox snooze' (or whatever one's they use for msnbc)... Calling a news source names is not needed to put down a flawed story, no matter the source.
 
rocket88 said:
And it's all about keeping those pesky Democrats from voting.

Your admission that it's all about voter suppression is noted.
Click to expand...

So, where are the court cases?

Let's see, the Justice Department lost the one in Texas. lost the one in Virginia.......

It appears what YOU call "suppression" the legal system calls fair...

Your admission of your ignorance is noted.
 
Wayno said:
Gee, what ever happened to those endless stories on Cindy Sheehan, and the constant mentions of the death totals in Iraq and Afghanistan.......

Oh, that's right.

Even though Obama ended the Iraq involvement on the Bush timetable, which never gets mentioned, and had a FAR HIGHER death rate in Afghanistan than Bush EVER did, ANOTHER fact that rarely if ever gets mentioned, since Bush is no longer in office, there's no need be objective when it comes to President Poodle Stew.

Unbiased is one thing.

Being a wholly owned public relations outlet for the Democrat Party is another.
Click to expand...


What's funny is that most of those going nuts about Obama ending Iraq on Bush's timetable are Conservatives, who seem to have forgotten that it was Bush's timetable.

Fox is a wholly owned public relations outlet of the Republican Party. When Ailes worked for Nixon, he wanted to start such an outlet and he did. Your point again is....
 
Wayno said:
So, where are the court cases?

Let's see, the Justice Department lost the one in Texas. lost the one in Virginia.......

It appears what YOU call "suppression" the legal system calls fair...

Your admission of your ignorance is noted.
Click to expand...

What do those have to do with: "We can't allow college IDs because they will vote Democrat," which is basically what you said.
 
Wayno said:
That would be the officially recognized newspaper of the former Soviet Union.
Click to expand...

Is there a version of "Godwin's Law" for bringing up the USSR for no real reason?
 
rocket88 said:
What's funny is that most of those going nuts about Obama ending Iraq on Bush's timetable are Conservatives, who seem to have forgotten that it was Bush's timetable.

Fox is a wholly owned public relations outlet of the Republican Party. When Ailes worked for Nixon, he wanted to start such an outlet and he did. Your point again is....
Click to expand...

BWAAHAHAHA.

Libs own every media outlet but ONE, and they're CRYING about it!

Too funny.
 
rocket88 said:
Is there a version of "Godwin's Law" for bringing up the USSR for no real reason?
Click to expand...


No one brought up the Soviet Union.

Pravda was brought up, and compared to the New York Times.

That was the officially sanctioned paper of the Soviet Union.

And obviously, the Times has much in common with them....


As the names of the main Communist newspaper and the main Soviet newspaper, Pravda and Izvestia, meant "the truth" and "the news" respectively, a popular Russian saying was "v Pravde net izvestiy, v Izvestiyakh net pravdy" (In the Truth there is no news, and in the News there is no truth).[10]
 
rocket88 said:
What do those have to do with: "We can't allow college IDs because they will vote Democrat," which is basically what you said.
Click to expand...


That's not what I said at all....

What I SAID was that educational institutions would find it in their interest to promote bias, because it relates to their funding, and the earnings and pensions of their professors.
 
Unitedwestand13 said:
No one In the United States would sell that paper, or even bother to read it. Like I said, I never heard of it and now I know why.
Click to expand...

No, you never heard of it because of your ignorance.

Most people who know anything about the print media do know about it.
 
rocket88 said:
Some of them actually admitted it! Not that you would know or want to hear, since it's "only Libs" that do dishonest things in your version of reality.

Convicted felon voted, and there's no turning back | StarTribune.com

That's one guy. So let's say 50 more in Minnesota out of "thousands" who didn't admit it and your talking points fall apart pretty quickly.
Click to expand...

Interesting link. This guy was actually dumb enough to register and vote under his own name. Your presumption that there are 50 more like him in Minnesota sounds like a Minnesota joke that people would tell in Wisconsin, Iowa or North Dakota.

But keep trying.
 
Wayno said:
I was born long after the Civil War.......

How do I know who fought it?
Click to expand...

By reading books about the civil war? Likewise I may be able to learn what Pravda was but i don't think the name of the soviet state newspaper fits in the lager scheme of the cold war
 
Diogenes said:
Interesting link. This guy was actually dumb enough to register and vote under his own name. Your presumption that there are 50 more like him in Minnesota sounds like a Minnesota joke that people would tell in Wisconsin, Iowa or North Dakota.

But keep trying.
Click to expand...

Um...I live in Minnesota, and I do presume that there are at least 51 criminals.

Wisconsin, Iowa and North Dakota have no right to tell Minnesota jokes. They do because it hurts the pain of all the people that escaped those states for Minnesota.
 
Wayno said:
BWAAHAHAHA.

Libs own every media outlet but ONE, and they're CRYING about it!

Too funny.
Click to expand...

Fox's existence doesn't bother me at all. But they are what they are - MSNBC for Conservatives. (Usually I say MSNBC is Fox for Liberals since Fox came before MSNBC became that, but it's still the same thing)
 
Unitedwestand13 said:
By reading books about the civil war? Likewise I may be able to learn what Pravda was but i don't think the name of the soviet state newspaper fits in the lager scheme of the cold war
Click to expand...

This was the officially endorsed source of information for the Soviet Union......

The place where every citizen was expected to learn the official Soviet position on every issue.

It's WELL worth noting that, because it CREATED what the average Russian PERCEIVED as reality as it relates to the cold war...

Glad I could help you out with that.....
 
rocket88 said:
And obviously, you are an [CENSORED].
Click to expand...

Like Popeye, I am what I am......

Sorry if the fact that The New York Times is a public relations vehicle for the Democrat Party upsets you......
 
Wayno said:
This was the officially endorsed source of information for the Soviet Union......

The place where every citizen was expected to learn the official Soviet position on every issue.

It's WELL worth noting that, because it CREATED what the average Russian PERCEIVED as reality as it relates to the cold war...

Glad I could help you out with that.....
Click to expand...

The difference between Pravda and the New York Times is that Pravda was government sponsored, and most likely government run and controlled. The New York Times is a privately run company with no ties to government.
 
Unitedwestand13 said:
The difference between Pravda and the New York Times is that Pravda was government sponsored, and most likely government run and controlled. The New York Times is a privately run company with no ties to government.
Click to expand...

Doesn't make any difference.

The NY Times toes the Liberal line, and goes out of it's way to attack Conservative positions and politicians.

Like I said, they're just a public relations arm of the Democrat Party.
 
Wayno said:
LOL.........

You need to provide a picture ID to obtain Government benefits......

You know, folks living in poverty, the elderly, college students.

Just another excuse to retain rampant fraud in our voting process.
Click to expand...

No you don't


From Massachusetts...

Myth: You need a photo ID to get SNAP/Food Stamps.

Fact: You need proof of identity. A photo ID is one way to prove identity. You can’t be turned down for SNAP/Food Stamps benefits because you don’t have photo ID. You can use another ID like a work or school badge, a health benefits card, an ID from another social service, a pay stub, a birth certificate, or a voter registration card. The SNAP/Food Stamps worker can also check your identity by calling shelter workers or employers.



From the GAO...

STATES MAY USE PHOTOGRAPHS ON
THE IDENTIFICATION CARDS BUT, UNDER DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
REGULATIONS, MAY NOT DENY OR DELAY BENEFITS TO HOUSEHOLDS
WHOSE MEMBERS ARE UNWILLING TO BE PHOTOGRAPHED.


From the USDA...

Identity

Driver’s License
Work or school identification card
Health benefits identification card
Voter registration card
Birth certificate


From lawhelp.org

You can't be denied for food stamps simply because you don't have a photo ID.
The Food Stamp caseworker is required to verify your identity. If you are unable to provide a photo ID, there are other ways to verify your identity such as wage stubs, a voter registration card, a birth certificate, or a "collateral contact" such as a homeless shelter case manager.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom