Since you wont be specific, let me do it for you. Here is the very first zany quote by Rand paul listed in your link:
• “Addressing President Bush’s program of channeling government money through religious-based charities, Paul said on KET’s Kentucky Tonight on June 30, 2008, that ‘churches do charity work, and that is wonderful, but they shouldn’t be corrupted with government money.’
“He also said the initiatives ‘obscure the church-state separation that there really ought to be,’” the paper reports.
Sheer madness right? How about the next one:
“In an interview on May 15, 2009, Paul told the host of Antiwar Radio that he would have voted against going to war in Iraq and that he opposes a long-term occupation of Iraq or Iran.”
“In the same interview, he said, ‘I think torture is always wrong’ and that ‘our country should have a higher ideal than that.’”
Is that libertarian lunacy? How about this one:
“I think you don’t have a right to happiness — you have the right to the pursuit of happiness,” Paul, an ophthalmologist, said in a 2009 Kentucky town hall meeting. “f you think you have the right to health care, you are saying basically that I am your slave. I provide health care. … My staff and technicians provide it. … If you have a right to health care, then you have a right to their labor.”
I could go on, but is that necessary? In general, libertarians believe that you are a free man, with a right to live your own life for its own sake, and should be left free to make your own decisions. Honestly, what is 'objectionable' about that?