• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Obama Asks Doctors to Help Deal With Guns

That's the point. If they ask about guns, but don't ask about baseball bats, knives, explosives, etc, then they are concentrating on only one item, and that is wrong. I understand you don't get that, as partisans rarely see outside of their agenda.
They ask about guns mainly out of fear of the person killing themselves. Guns are by far the most effective way of doing so. According to the study I just posted, only 3% of people that commit suicide with pills are successful, compared to more than 90% by firearms.

The doctor has a duty to report a credible threat regardless of if the person said they were going to shoot someone, or poison them, or blow them up , or what ever. But if we are talking suicide, if that person has a gun easily available to them, then the chances of them actually killing themselves are WAY higher, and it deserves a simple question, regardless of your irrational fear.

BTW, if someone is so mentally messed up they want to kill themselves and the family doesn't help them, oh f'in well. We have too many problematic people in the world, one less is probably a good thing. Harsh? Hell yeah.

Thanks for letting everyone know that it's pointless to debate with you. You just don't give a **** period. And good for you. Let the rest of us have a civilized discussion with out your caveman logic interrupting us.
 
Not so. If a pediatrician were to find that a child lives in a home where a gun is not locked in a safe, he could easily decide that child is at risk and report it (and some would say it would be their moral obligation to do so). At least...that is the opinion of the American Academy of Pediatrics, and would also fit within CPS mandatory reporting guidelines for unsafe conditions in the home, and a report of neglect.

"Parents are often not aware that unsafe storage of guns has caused many child injuries and deaths," said Dr. Neal Kaufman, professor of pediatrics and public health at the University of California, Los Angeles Schools of Medicine and Public Health. Pediatricians have a responsibility to identify possible threats to a child's safety and highlight ways parents can lessen those risks, Kaufman said.

Find me an instance where a doctor turned in parents for not storing guns safely. That's not what doctors are supposed to be doing. They can discuss unsafe practices with the family, but their duty is to report threats of violence, as I have said a dozen times before.

A pediatrician talking about safe gun ownership with parents has nothing to do with them turning you in, lol. Your quote is laughable and shows you have no idea what were even arguing.
 
OBTW...Japans suicide rate? Its 250% (5x) higher than that in the US.

And yet it still has nothing to do with the topic, and completely ignores the study I posted that showed you are much more likely, in our country, to die from suicide if you have a gun in the home.
 
Find me an instance where a doctor turned in parents for not storing guns safely. That's not what doctors are supposed to be doing. They can discuss unsafe practices with the family, but their duty is to report threats of violence, as I have said a dozen times before.

A pediatrician talking about safe gun ownership with parents has nothing to do with them turning you in, lol. Your quote is laughable and shows you have no idea what were even arguing.
Oh I COMPLETELY agree. Thats NOT what they are supposed to do. But then...this new EO isnt ABOUT what doctors are SUPPOSED to do, it is about what they are now being told they can and SHOULD do.

I love your LOLing...it is so cute. Now...as a mandatory reporter...what happens to you when you are aware of a situation where a child might be considered at risk in a home and you dont report it?
 
And yet it still has nothing to do with the topic, and completely ignores the study I posted that showed you are much more likely, in our country, to die from suicide if you have a gun in the home.
Like I said...you keep on making up **** in the pretense that your comments support your ideology. The FACT is that guns do not CAUSE suicides, do not INCREASE the number and likelihood of someone attempting or even completing the suicidal act as is EVIDENCED by people that do not HAVE access to firearms...yet manage to kill themselves at a rate 5 TIMES greater than we do with our eeeeeeeevil guns.
 
Like I said...you keep on making up **** in the pretense that your comments support your ideology. The FACT is that guns do not CAUSE suicides, do not INCREASE the number and likelihood of someone attempting or even completing the suicidal act as is EVIDENCED by people that do not HAVE access to firearms...yet manage to kill themselves at a rate 5 TIMES greater than we do with our eeeeeeeevil guns.

Sorry, you're calling it a fact that guns don't increase suicides even though I have given you a study proving otherwise. It is not the only factor, suicides can certainly be cause or influenced by economic woes, a societal acceptance of suicide etc as we see in japan, but to argue like you are that they make no difference is silly.

You can't compare our suicide rate to japans and say "see they don't have guns and it's higher!" That does not prove causation, and completely ignores that in Japan it's more out in the open and socially acceptable and is practically a part of heritage.

A more appropriate view would be comparing people within a single country, where other factors aren't nearly as different, and see how much more likly a person is to accomplish suicide when they don't have a gun and when they do. I have given you that study, the conclusions are clear. If you don't choose to accept them, that's your problem.
 
Sorry, you're calling it a fact that guns don't increase suicides even though I have given you a study proving otherwise. It is not the only factor, suicides can certainly be cause or influenced by economic woes, a societal acceptance of suicide etc as we see in japan, but to argue like you are that they make no difference is silly.

You can't compare our suicide rate to japans and say "see they don't have guns and it's higher!" That does not prove causation, and completely ignores that in Japan it's more out in the open and socially acceptable and is practically a part of heritage.

A more appropriate view would be comparing people within a single country, where other factors aren't nearly as different, and see how much more likly a person is to accomplish suicide when they don't have a gun and when they do. I have given you that study, the conclusions are clear. If you don't choose to accept them, that's your problem.
Like my grandpappy used to say..."Why thats just horse****, son."

You simply REFUSE to accept the FACT that people WILL commit suicide by any means necessary and that a country WITHOUT ready access to firearms has CLEARLY proven that it is not the MEANS that is lethal...it is the individual and their intent. 5 TIMES higher suicide rate WITHOUT guns. Your argument go boom.
 
Like my grandpappy used to say..."Why thats just horse****, son."

You simply REFUSE to accept the FACT that people WILL commit suicide by any means necessary

Then why does my study, scientific study vs. your compare apples to oranges, bull**** comparison, show that you are much more likely to commit suicide if you have a gun in your home? It's because it makes the process fast and easy and very successful. I've given you the stats and the studies, choose to accept them or continue ignoring them, I don't really care any more.
 
Then why does my study, scientific study vs. your compare apples to oranges, bull**** comparison, show that you are much more likely to commit suicide if you have a gun in your home? It's because it makes the process fast and easy and very successful. I've given you the stats and the studies, choose to accept them or continue ignoring them, I don't really care any more.
DOES your study take into account the rfact that people that dont have access to firearms are FIVE TIMES more successful at committing suicide? Really? Really?

Yeah...I dont think so either.
 
DOES your study take into account the rfact that people that dont have access to firearms are FIVE TIMES more successful at committing suicide? Really? Really?

Yeah...I dont think so either.

You're talking about a completely different country with a completely different set of societal standards and norms and conditions.

Why do you ignore the study that compares apples to apples but harp on your comparison of apples to oranges?
 
You're talking about a completely different country with a completely different set of societal standards and norms and conditions.

Why do you ignore the study that compares apples to apples but harp on your comparison of apples to oranges?
We are talking about the SAME act committed by people on two different continents. We are talking about people without access to firearms 5 TIMES more successful at committing the act, very clearly demonstrating that where there is a will, the 'way' doesnt mean ****.
 
We are talking about the SAME act committed by people on two different continents. We are talking about people without access to firearms 5 TIMES more successful at committing the act, very clearly demonstrating that where there is a will, the 'way' doesnt mean ****.

I am talking about a scientific study, showing that IN THE SAME COUNTRY, it very much does matter.

Also you're comparing successful suicides to successful suicides. You haven't shown any stats on suicide attempts in Japan. As I've pointed out, Suicide attempts by pills, another large segment of all suicide attempts in this country, is only 3% successful where as the gun gets you up to over a 90% success rate. For all you know the attempt rate is 100 times higher in japan and the success rate is only 5 times higher, which if you have any intelligence at all, you can tell would be significantly higher if every body in japan had easy access to a gun.

VM, you are not taking into account Japans society, the failure of their mental healthcare service etc.

You can not ignore all this stuff and expect me to take you serious.
 
They ask about guns mainly out of fear of the person killing themselves.

The doctor has a duty to report a credible threat regardless of if the person said they were going to shoot someone, or poison them, or blow them up , or what ever.

So which is it? Hurting themselves or hurting others? Because you keep jumping around. And of course you keep ignoring all the other things doctors could ask about that are more frequently used to hurt/kill others...

Thanks for letting everyone know that it's pointless to debate with you. You just don't give a **** period. And good for you. Let the rest of us have a civilized discussion with out your caveman logic interrupting us.

Awe, because I "don't care", you use that as a justification to drive over the cliff? How sad.

FWIW, in a discussion with the wife this morning, she informed me that when I was in the military and she would take the kids into that 'great' government healthcare system for 'wellness' checks, they'd ask about firearms in the house and all sorts of other stuff not related to the kids or their wellness... in general her answers were 'it's none of your damn business'.
 
I am talking about a scientific study, showing that IN THE SAME COUNTRY, it very much does matter.

Also you're comparing successful suicides to successful suicides. You haven't shown any stats on suicide attempts in Japan. As I've pointed out, Suicide attempts by pills, another large segment of all suicide attempts in this country, is only 3% successful where as the gun gets you up to over a 90% success rate. For all you know the attempt rate is 100 times higher in japan and the success rate is only 5 times higher, which if you have any intelligence at all, you can tell would be significantly higher if every body in japan had easy access to a gun.

VM, you are not taking into account Japans society, the failure of their mental healthcare service etc.

You can not ignore all this stuff and expect me to take you serious.
And the FACTS show that where suicidal people do NOT have access to firearms they STILL manage to kill themselves, and a rate 5X more than we do. I know...you want to cling to that bone...but there is just no meat on it. Women in this country are FAR less likely to attempt suicide using a firearm, yet manage to complete the act quite efficiently using other means. You HAVE to get the FACTS, you just refuse to ACKNOWLEDGE the facts. A firearm is A means of committing suicide. Around the world, people demonstrate far GREATER proficiency by using means OTHER than a firearm. IN this country, women demonstrate the ability by means OTHER than a firearm. Its JUST a means.
 
And the FACTS show that where suicidal people do NOT have access to firearms they STILL manage to kill themselves, and a rate 5X more than we do. I know...you want to cling to that bone...but there is just no meat on it. Women in this country are FAR less likely to attempt suicide using a firearm, yet manage to complete the act quite efficiently using other means. You HAVE to get the FACTS, you just refuse to ACKNOWLEDGE the facts. A firearm is A means of committing suicide. Around the world, people demonstrate far GREATER proficiency by using means OTHER than a firearm. IN this country, women demonstrate the ability by means OTHER than a firearm. Its JUST a means.

I know it's just a means, a very good means, which is why it makes sense that a doctor asks a suicidal patient about it.

I'm done with this. You won't understand regardless.
 
Yes it's their personal property. That doesn't mean it can't be asked about. Don't you think a doctor would ask about your house if you came in with lead poisoning and he though that old lead paint could be the culprit? ****, last time I was at the doctor for an ingrown nail he made sure to ask me about my shoes, which are my personal property.

How is either of those examples related to asking about guns that have nothing to do with the problem they are facing?
 
So which is it? Hurting themselves or hurting others? Because you keep jumping around. And of course you keep ignoring all the other things doctors could ask about that are more frequently used to hurt/kill others...

If someone said they are going to hurt others, then the doctor would be asking for that reason. If someone said they have suicidal thoughts, he'd be asking for that reason. This isn't complicated and I don't have the time to draw you a diagram.
 
Find me an instance where a doctor turned in parents for not storing guns safely. That's not what doctors are supposed to be doing. They can discuss unsafe practices with the family, but their duty is to report threats of violence, as I have said a dozen times before.

How is that their duty? How is that related to their job?
 
If someone said they are going to hurt others, then the doctor would be asking for that reason. If someone said they have suicidal thoughts, he'd be asking for that reason. This isn't complicated and I don't have the time to draw you a diagram.

In either case, it is irrelevant if they have guns. If it is the duty of the doctor to 'report' people that say they are going to hurt others, or themselves, then report it. Done.

I'm sure a crayon masterpiece from you wouldn't change the realities you keep fighting against.
 
In either case, it is irrelevant if they have guns. If it is the duty of the doctor to 'report' people that say they are going to hurt others, or themselves, then report it. Done.

It's two seperate issues. They are not always going to ask if there is a gun. If someone makes a threat, then if they have a gun or not doesn't change the fact, and the doctor can report the threat without the gun information

If a person comes in and the doctor thinks the person is suicidal, it is a good idea to ask if the person has any guns at home and if they are locked up etc. because all evidence points towards the fact that you are more likely to perform a successful suicide if you have a gun nearby than if you were to go about suicide using another measure. It's a good question.
 
If a person comes in and the doctor thinks the person is suicidal, it is a good idea to ask if the person has any guns at home and if they are locked up etc. because all evidence points towards the fact that you are more likely to perform a successful suicide if you have a gun nearby than if you were to go about suicide using another measure. It's a good question.

I'm not really sorry to say, such a statement is just bold ignorance...
 
I know it's just a means, a very good means, which is why it makes sense that a doctor asks a suicidal patient about it.

I'm done with this. You won't understand regardless.

I always laugh a bit when I see that. You IGNORE the factual reality that while women in this country use a means OTHER than a firearm the vast majority of the time and while a country like Japan with NO firearms access STILL manages to commit suicide at a rate 5x greater than the US, you still insist it is the evil gun that is the problem and that someone other than yourself "doesn't understand".
 
I always laugh a bit when I see that. You IGNORE the factual reality that while women in this country use a means OTHER than a firearm the vast majority of the time and while a country like Japan with NO firearms access STILL manages to commit suicide at a rate 5x greater than the US, you still insist it is the evil gun that is the problem and that someone other than yourself "doesn't understand".

You still are not understanding anything I am saying. So I'm going to list it out as simply as possible and any response form you that does not address them directly, I am not responding to. Because the fact that women use other means and that Japan has a higher rate has exactly nothing to do with my point. Also, your bull**** assertion that I am blaming everything on the gun is entirely wrong. I am saying it is a factor. Along with dozens of other factors. So you can cut that bull**** out right now. I am not making that claim, do not act like I am.

1. When people have easy access to guns or guns in their home, they are much more likely to commit suicide and do so effectively. Some people use other methods, without doubt, but in this country, guns are the leading cause and provide a very efficient way to do so.
As evidence I provide the following study:
Guns in Homes Strongly Associated with Higher Rates of Suicide - April 10, 2007 -2007 Releases - Press Releases - Harvard School of Public Health

2. Because of point 1, it makes sense that if a doctor feels that patient is suicidal, that they would ask the person, or the persons guardians, about gun ownership, and recommend safety precautions, such as locking them up or handing them over to a loved one, until the person has figured out a way to deal with their current situation.

Those are my points. The fact that Japan has high rates of suicide does nothing to argue against the facts presented in point 1. Mainly because you can not provide me any evidence that would suggest that suicide rates would not be higher if people in japan had very easy access to guns. You have also not provided evidence showing that suicide attempts are also 5 times higher than our countries. As I have pointed out, one of the reasons guns are a main concern when discussing suicide, is that they result in a 90% success rate, where as pills result in 3% success rate.

Now with this, I will stipulate that I am not suggesting that doctors should go around suggesting that everyone should get rid of their guns, I am not suggesting people kill themselves simply because they have guns, I am not saying that getting rid of all guns erases all cases of suicide, I am not saying that there are no other ways to commit suicide, and I am not saying that some of the people who commit suicide through the use of guns would not find some other way to commit suicide.

Now, here's a simple question.

Show me the proof that Japan's suicide rate wouldn't be any higher if they didn't have the easy access to guns that we have here. I have shown you the study showing how gun ownership in our country relates to suicide (which is the actual topic btw, imagine that?) now show me the proof that Japan's would be higher.

To liken this to another topic... Lets say I show you that country "x" has a very long life span average, much longer than ours. They also have universal healthcare. Could I then make a blanket statement, as you are here about Japan and suicide rates, that the universal healthcare is obviously better than our system, given that they live longer? Or would I be completely ignoring the possible difference in society, such as maybe they don't have fast food joints on every corner, that they just live healthier lives in general etc...?

That's right, You would have to take in to account the societal differences. And that is what you are missing on your japan analysis. In fact, suicide rates are all over the place, England has less suicides that us per capita and they have no guns. Regardless, that makes no difference to my argument. Japan having high rates, while it does show that you can commit suicide at high rates without guns, given other factors, it does not show, in ANY way, that doctors talking to patients that could be suicidal about their guns will not have any impact. Given that the studies show that gun ownership is so strongly associated with successful suicide attempts, it makes sense that it would have some kind of a positive impact to have the discussion with patients.
 
Back
Top Bottom