• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump releases birth certificate to Bill Maher, demands $5M

Objective Voice

DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 14, 2008
Messages
12,973
Reaction score
5,701
Location
Huntsville, AL (USA)
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Moderate
Just found this article on YahooNews' The Lookout blog. Yahoo News exclusive: Trump releases birth certificate to Bill Maher, demands $5M | The Lookout - Yahoo! News Seems Bill Maher might have written a check his mouth can't cash. Still, I found one thing very laughable about The Donald's response to Bill Maher's birther challenge.

If folks recall, Donald Trump critisized the President for releasing the short-form version of his "Certification of Live Birth" even going as far as saying it wasn't good enough to substantiate the details of his birth and that the long-form was a more viable document. But when challenged to release his own birth certificate, what does the Donald provide?

A short-form version of his "Certification of Birth".

H-I-L-A-R-I-O-U-S! :lol: You really can't make this stuff up, folks!
 
Your laughing makes no sense.
If Maher excepts what Trump's lawyer submitted to claim on the bet. Maher loses.


If Maher demands the long form, he will lose the bet because I am more than sure Trump can produce his long form just as I could.
But Maher would then also loose on the BC front showing that the short form isn't good enough.
In the end, Maher loses.

I hope he or his representation isn't stupid enough to fall for the trap.
 
Just found this article on YahooNews' The Lookout blog. Yahoo News exclusive: Trump releases birth certificate to Bill Maher, demands $5M | The Lookout - Yahoo! News Seems Bill Maher might have written a check his mouth can't cash. Still, I found one thing very laughable about The Donald's response to Bill Maher's birther challenge.

If folks recall, Donald Trump critisized the President for releasing the short-form version of his "Certification of Live Birth" even going as far as saying it wasn't good enough to substantiate the details of his birth and that the long-form was a more viable document. But when challenged to release his own birth certificate, what does the Donald provide?

A short-form version of his "Certification of Birth".

H-I-L-A-R-I-O-U-S! :lol: You really can't make this stuff up, folks!
Looks like a fake. Where's the raised seal? Where's the crease? He needs to produce at least two newspaper announcements, at least two others born at the same time so we can confirm the certificate number, and at least 2 governors and a director of health to confirm its authenticity.
 
Looks like a fake. Where's the raised seal? Where's the crease? He needs to produce at least two newspaper announcements, at least two others born at the same time so we can confirm the certificate number, and at least 2 governors and a director of health to confirm its authenticity.

If he were running for the President of The U.S. you may have a point.

As he isn't, you have no point
 
Your laughing makes no sense.
If Maher excepts what Trump's lawyer submitted to claim on the bet. Maher loses.


If Maher demands the long form, he will lose the bet because I am more than sure Trump can produce his long form just as I could.
But Maher would then also loose on the BC front showing that the short form isn't good enough.
In the end, Maher loses.

I hope he or his representation isn't stupid enough to fall for the trap.
How does a birth certificate prove who the biological father is?
 
If he were running for the President of The U.S. you may have a point.

As he isn't, you have no point
Like jetboogieman so eloquently waxed -- you have no sense of humor.
 
Maher may be on to something.

trumphair.jpg
 
How does a birth certificate prove who the biological father is?
Are you suggesting that the U.S. court do not except a Certification of Birth as proof?
 
Are you suggesting that the U.S. court do not except a Certification of Birth as proof?
Try answering my question rather than asking me one.

How does a birth certificate prove who the biological father is?
 
Trolling at its finest. Bill Maher is doing it well.
 
Like jetboogieman so eloquently waxed -- you have no sense of humor.

Ah so you are given to buy into something another says when they know not of what they speak.
That explains a lot, no?

My sence of humor is alive and well.
It may be different than your's or Jetboogieman's, but to say I don't have one, is someone speaking of what they know not.
 
How does a birth certificate prove who the biological father is?
Are you suggesting that the U.S. courts do not except a Certification of Birth as proof?
 
Ah so you are given to buy into something another says when they know not of what they speak.
That explains a lot, no?
No.

I pointed out what he said was accurate based on your inability to spot the irony highlighted by objective voice or the mockery I posted.
 
Are you suggesting that the U.S. courts do not except a Certification of Birth as proof?
You still can't answer??

No worries. Your refusal to answer, answers for you.


:coffeepap:
 
Your laughing makes no sense.
Sure it does if you've followed this birther issue from the start, but especially if you followed the Donald's forray into the matter.

Bottom Line: You don't challenge (or rather all but demand) the President to present his long-form birth certificate as proof of his legitimate birth claiming that the short-form birth certification for all practical purposes is worthless, but turn around and present the short-form version of your own birth certification when directly challenged to show your own birth creditials. Kinda make you look like a hypocrite (or a total idiot!)
 
Sure it does if you've followed this birther issue from the start, but especially if you followed the Donald's forray into the matter.

Bottom Line: You don't challenge (or rather all but demand) the President to present his long-form birth certificate as proof of his legitimate birth claiming that the short-form birth certification for all practical purposes is worthless, but turn around and present the short-form version of your own birth certification when directly challenged to show your own birth creditials. Kinda make you look like a hypocrite (or a total idiot!)

I guess you are failing to see the other possibilities behind presentation of such.
That is why your laughter makes no sense.
You are assuming one thing, when it could actually be purposefully done for another.
 
Last edited:
No.

I pointed out what he said was accurate based on your inability to spot the irony highlighted by objective voice or the mockery I posted.
As you have failed to identify the word "droll", you continue to make your interpretation of the events look foolish.



You still can't answer??

No worries. Your refusal to answer, answers for you.
I guess that applies to you not answering the question proffered to you.

Are you suggesting that the U.S. courts do not except a Certification of Birth as proof?
 
You still can't answer??

No worries. Your refusal to answer, answers for you.


<squawk>I guess that applies to you not answering the question proffered to you.</squawk>
I see you still can't think for yourself and have to rely on what others post to you feed you your response.

Your parrotry aside, I didn't answer because your question is a non-sequitur since you don't specify for what cause a court might be presented a birth certificate.


Are you suggesting that the U.S. courts do not except a Certification of Birth as proof?
Even though you refuse to answer my question (since you know it buries your assertion that Maher loses over Trump's BC), I will answer yours anyway.

The answer is ... it depends on what the matter of the lawsuit is about. If a birth certifcate is offered as proof of where a person was born, then yes, the court accepts a certification of birth as proof of where the person was born. If a birth certifcate is offered as proof of when a person was born, then yes, the court accepts a certification of birth as proof of when the person is born. If Donald Trump offers his birth certifcate as proof that the man listed as his father on it is his biological father, then no, a court will not accept that as proof since (and I'm answering my own question to you since you refused to answer it) ... since it offers no proof that the man listed on it as his father was his biological father.
 
I thought the bet had a time limit on it, didn't mayer say the certificate had to be presented BEFORE the election?

it was part of the back and forth those two had giving each other a ton of free publicity.
 
I thought the bet had a time limit on it, didn't mayer say the certificate had to be presented BEFORE the election?

it was part of the back and forth those two had giving each other a ton of free publicity.
He made the joke just a few nights ago.
 
He made the joke just a few nights ago.

i get so confused, there were so many challenges and counter demands throughout this year's republican nomination process, what i like the call the gimp circus of the GOP, I became to lost track on who wanted whom to show what....
 
Back
Top Bottom