• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

O'Reilly: Al Gore's sale to al-Jazeera 'sleazy and disgraceful' [W:153/170/200]

re: O'Reilly: Al Gore's sale to al-Jazeera 'sleazy and disgraceful' [W:152]

Just like Islamist Sleeper Cell members are on their best behavior until the time comes for them to perform their jihadist act.

Careful, I heard they're sleeping under beds now, waiting for children to get up in the middle of the night.
 
re: O'Reilly: Al Gore's sale to al-Jazeera 'sleazy and disgraceful' [W:152]

I'm sure you are familiar with the non-violent Jihadist acts which contribute to a longterm campaign to establish a global Caliphate.

For those unaware of the story, a heated debate on the matter of the 9/11 attacks was held in the ME aj studios. One debater was strongly in support of the attacks. His opponent was against the attacks.

But the two debaters didn't disagree on the desired outcome of eventual Islamist global domination. No, the two disagreed only on the MEANS for accomplishing Islamist domination.

One felt that violence was best used to achieve the goal. The other believed that NON-VIOLENT JIHAD should be more effective in the long run.

Do you have a source for this beyond the voices in your -- I mean, on your radio?
 
re: O'Reilly: Al Gore's sale to al-Jazeera 'sleazy and disgraceful' [W:152]

I'm sorry, did I miss something? Has al-Jazeera been setting up IEDs? Firing RPGs? Sniping?

It has an Arabic-sounding name so they must be terrists.

No seriously this is what people think.
 
re: O'Reilly: Al Gore's sale to al-Jazeera 'sleazy and disgraceful' [W:152]

What you do seem to forget is the unstinting aid the state of Qatar (owners of AJ) have provided to the US military during two Gulf wars and continuing through the war in Afghanistan. They are some of your best friends in the region.

That's not saying much. Pakistan had managed to be our best friend in our quest to catch/kill OBL. They were our unstinting allies in that campaign until Obama et al decided they couldn't be trusted beyond a certain point.


There is an apocrophal story about the inscription on the gravestone of an Englishman who died in the Middle East. It was something about, 'Here lies one more Englishman who mistakenly thought he could discern the Middle Eastern mind.'
 
re: O'Reilly: Al Gore's sale to al-Jazeera 'sleazy and disgraceful' [W:152]

There is an apocrophal story about the inscription on the gravestone of an Englishman who died in the Middle East. It was something about, 'Here lies one more Englishman who mistakenly thought he could discern the Middle Eastern mind.'

Well, golly, I sure am glad that we have you here to explain everything to us, because obviously that wire hanger you soldered to the fillings in your teeth better qualifies you to teach us all about the Middle East.
 
re: O'Reilly: Al Gore's sale to al-Jazeera 'sleazy and disgraceful' [W:152]

Bill O has been up in AJ grill for years for showing Bin Laden's tapes and vids of dead US soldiers and the like. He just doesn't like that they are more fair and balanced than him
 
re: O'Reilly: Al Gore's sale to al-Jazeera 'sleazy and disgraceful' [W:152]

:laughat:

You condemn this company as a Islamic radicalist goup simply because they are based in an Islamic country and are Islamic as a result. Otherwise you would not have made a comment comparing them to Jihadist sleeper cells. So please refrain fom your "facepalm" emoticon
 
Last edited:
re: O'Reilly: Al Gore's sale to al-Jazeera 'sleazy and disgraceful' [W:152]

This is racism and nothing less

What race exactly was this comment about?
 
re: O'Reilly: Al Gore's sale to al-Jazeera 'sleazy and disgraceful' [W:152]

I regret not sharing your level of paranoia. Now, as thy say, paranoids have real enemies also, but this just doesn't ring my alarm bells.
View attachment 67140406

I'll guess that your alarm bell failed to ring when OBL announced on a national TV news program that he was issuing a fatwa on the US, i.e. they were officially at war with the US, in the late 1990's.

John Miller's 1998 Interview With Osama Bin Laden (Why We Fight Reminder)

And if you'd known there were ONLY 19 Sleeper Cell members in the US on the morning of 9/11/01 you probably would have slept through that alarm, too.
 
re: O'Reilly: Al Gore's sale to al-Jazeera 'sleazy and disgraceful' [W:152]

What race exactly was this comment about?

He made a comment that put the integrity of AL Jazeera into question by comparing them to Islamic sleeper cells. I don't believe that he would have made this comment or even question their motives in such a way if they were caucasian and or christian.

About the race in particular that would be what today we consider middle eastern. Theu are commonly people of Turkish, Semitic, Arabic and assorted other cultures. In certain areas you have Christian sects, Judism and Zorostrianism, but for the most part is predominantly muslim
 
Last edited:
re: O'Reilly: Al Gore's sale to al-Jazeera 'sleazy and disgraceful' [W:152]

Oh, I get it -- refusing to drink the Kool Aid is plauing dumb.

In your case playing dumb means pretending to underestimate Islamism and Islamists.
 
re: O'Reilly: Al Gore's sale to al-Jazeera 'sleazy and disgraceful' [W:152]

In your case playing dumb means pretending to underestimate Islamism and Islamists.

No, it means disagreeing with you, which means refusing to fear that there are sleeper cells hiding in closets all over America.
 
re: O'Reilly: Al Gore's sale to al-Jazeera 'sleazy and disgraceful' [W:152]

Do you agree with Oreilly....I more agree than disagree, im admittedly not an Al Gore fan


O'Reilly: Al Gore's sale to al-Jazeera 'sleazy and disgraceful' - POLITICO.com
so, a failing media outlet with practically no portion of the viewing public aware of its existence, is worth half a billion bucks?
Must be backed up by oil money.....
Will AJ be able to sell advertising? Who will be the sponsors?
 
re: O'Reilly: Al Gore's sale to al-Jazeera 'sleazy and disgraceful' [W:152]

What this really is about is some people even if they don't want to admit it and perhaps its a subconcious reaction to AJ.

They don't like Muslims and to a lesser extent arabs.

Simple as that.

It probably has more to do with people not liking the anti-american sentiment which AJ has not done a good job separating themselves from and has in the past done an excellent job perpetrating it.
 
re: O'Reilly: Al Gore's sale to al-Jazeera 'sleazy and disgraceful' [W:152]

It probably has more to do with people not liking the anti-american sentiment which AJ has not done a good job separating themselves from and has in the past done an excellent job perpetrating it.

Could you name me three specific examples of unequivocal anti-American propaganda that AJ has broadcast in the past year?
 
re: O'Reilly: Al Gore's sale to al-Jazeera 'sleazy and disgraceful' [W:152]

Could you name me three specific examples of unequivocal anti-American propaganda that AJ has broadcast in the past year?

Why? I didn't say anything about the last year I'm just a fan of calling things like they are and not automatically jumping to accusations of racism in cases that more likely have to do with a hesitation towards the past anti-american sentiment of AJ.
 
re: O'Reilly: Al Gore's sale to al-Jazeera 'sleazy and disgraceful' [W:152]

The whole USG slept through that one unless you think Bush did it, not very likely.

Al Jazeera has not issued a Fatwa that I'm aware of. They seem to be a capitalist enterprise. Does it trouble you that they are a Mid-East company or am I missing something you're trying to communicate?

I'll guess that your alarm bell failed to ring when OBL announced on a national TV news program that he was issuing a fatwa on the US, i.e. they were officially at war with the US, in the late 1990's.

John Miller's 1998 Interview With Osama Bin Laden (Why We Fight Reminder)

And if you'd known there were ONLY 19 Sleeper Cell members in the US on the morning of 9/11/01 you probably would have slept through that alarm, too.
 
re: O'Reilly: Al Gore's sale to al-Jazeera 'sleazy and disgraceful' [W:152]

It probably has more to do with people not liking the anti-american sentiment which AJ has not done a good job separating themselves from and has in the past done an excellent job perpetrating it.

Good one.

Except what especially many far right wingers consider to be Anti-American comes from their own president and in most cases is simply something that they do not agree with.

So I don't put much stock in that opinion.

AJ is not particularly anti-American.
 
re: O'Reilly: Al Gore's sale to al-Jazeera 'sleazy and disgraceful' [W:152]

That's certainly been Murdoch's attitude to paying tax.

Weak comparison; I don't recall Murdoch ever being a proponent for higher taxes like the golden boy who just avoided paying them is. And BTW, that doesn't make Murdoch a hypocrite but it sure does make AL Gore one.
 
re: O'Reilly: Al Gore's sale to al-Jazeera 'sleazy and disgraceful' [W:152]

About what? That Christianity isn't a religion?

This maybe true, I just don't think O'Reilly or Fox are capable of telling it.

Neither you nor they can provide any evidence of this. I'd go so far as to guess you've never even watched it.

I'd call it even.

Of course you'd call it even. It isn't, but of course you'd say it is.

I have watched AJ in America and of course they do a good job of keeping the Islamist agenda in the background. Are you suggesting there is no Islamic agenda to achieve global dominion?
 
re: O'Reilly: Al Gore's sale to al-Jazeera 'sleazy and disgraceful' [W:152]

Who cares what Al Gore does?

Who cares what Bill O'reilly thinks?
 
re: O'Reilly: Al Gore's sale to al-Jazeera 'sleazy and disgraceful' [W:152]

Μολὼν λαβέ;1061323963 said:
Weak comparison; I don't recall Murdoch ever being a proponent for higher taxes like the golden boy who just avoided paying them is. And BTW, that doesn't make Murdoch a hypocrite but it sure does make AL Gore one.

He'll be paying taxes on this sale, far more than most of us will pay in our individual lifetimes.
 
re: O'Reilly: Al Gore's sale to al-Jazeera 'sleazy and disgraceful' [W:152]

Good one.

Except what especially many far right wingers consider to be Anti-American comes from their own president and in most cases is simply something that they do not agree with.

So I don't put much stock in that opinion.

AJ is not particularly anti-American.

They are anti-american unless they did a 180 since post 9/11 when they use to praise OBL. They're much more anti-Israeli however but that usually doesn't give them too many points here either.

I don't know, maybe they're less biased than they use to be hopefully they're much less so than back in the day when they threw a birthday party for Samir Kuntar and praised him for being a hero after he spent time in an Israeli prison for killing at least three people, one being a four year old girl, they found her brain matter on his rifle. That was in 2008.
 
re: O'Reilly: Al Gore's sale to al-Jazeera 'sleazy and disgraceful' [W:152]

What this really is about is some people even if they don't want to admit it and perhaps its a subconcious reaction to AJ.

They don't like Muslims and to a lesser extent arabs.

Simple as that.

It is perfectly reasonable to dislike those who are actively and openly or covertly, stealthily and/or passively planning to kill or injure or subjugate you or treat you as less than a full citizen.

Do you deny that such an agenda exists?

It's called the Koran.

A small percentage of Muslims actively and regularly work at achieving a global Caliphate.

Some of them believe that only violence can achieve the goal.

These are the radicals.

But some readers might quickly knee-jerk the reply, 'but the radicals are in the minority.'

"It matters not a whit that most Muslims are not radicals."

our current conflict is as much ideological as it is military. Walid Phares calls it a "War of Ideas," and he is certainly onto something.

Many will object that "few people actually believe in radical Islam," and we heat things along the lines of "only 10 percent of Muslims are radicals/sympathetic to the radicals," and that "only a miniscule number of Americans/Westerners buy into radical Islam so the danger is overblown."

But history is not made by taking a vote at every important moment. Only 1/3 of the American colonists wanted independence from Great Britain in 1776. The Jacobins were a minority of Frenchmen in 1789, and the Bolsheviks a minority of Russians in 1917. The quota on imported sugar in America today is not there because it has the broad support of Americans but because of the political influence of a small minority of sugar growers in Louisiana. Less than half of Americans even vote in most elections, and the more local the election is the fewer people vote. History and outcomes are made by determined and well-organized minorities.

So it is with radical Islam. It matters not a whit that most Muslims are not radicals. If the average Muslim moderates are not willing to stand up and demand that Muslim Brotherhood influence be purged from Muslim organizations, then the radicals win, no matter how few their numbers. Consider the fate of Molly Norris, the Seattle cartoonist who organized the "Everybody Draw Mohammed" day in 2010 as a protest against censorship. After threats she canceled the contest and apologized. No matter, the threats continued until she has changed her name and gone into hiding on the advice of the FBI. There was and is no support from Muslim groups, or hardly anyone outside of a few conservatives, for that matter, for the concept of free speech.

The danger is rather a sort of "creeping sharia" whereby we suffer the death of a thousand cuts rather than the one by the guillotine. Muslim radicals aim to deceive us as to their true intention, which is to spread their sharia(or "shariah") into the West, replacing our values with their own. In short, their objective is to take us over peacefully over a long period of time, not militarily all at once.

http://theredhunter.com/the_war_of_ideas_islamic_extremism_and_the_west/
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom