• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Journal hires armed guards to protect their headquarters after publishing map

StubbornMoose

StubbornMoose

Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2012
Messages
55
Reaction score
50
Location
Pennsylvania
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
The Journal News is Armed and Dangerous | The Rockland County Times

A Clarkstown police report issued on December 28, 2012, confirmed that The Journal News has hired armed security guards from New City-based RGA Investigations and that they are manning the newspaper’s Rockland County headquarters at 1 Crosfield Ave., West Nyack, through at least tomorrow, Wednesday, January 2, 2013.
Click to expand...

Where will the hypocrisy stop?
 
The competing area newspaper reporting a big influx in new subscriptions is the best news of the article.
 
joko104 said:
The competing area newspaper reporting a big influx in new subscriptions is the best news of the article.
Click to expand...

Which is how free speech is supposed to work IMHO.
 
It always make me laugh a little, when anti-gunners resort to using guns. :lol:
 
The position of the newspaper is one many anti-gun people effectively take. That only RICH people can use guns to protect themselves, not peasants.
 
joko104 said:
The position of the newspaper is one many anti-gun people effectively take. That only RICH people can use guns to protect themselves, not peasants.
Click to expand...

Exactly. That is the ultimate hypocracy of the left. They squeal endlessly about the "discrimitory burden" of simply requiring one to present valid, state issued, photo ID to vote (only citizens of age, only once and only as yourself in any given election) yet see nothing of the sort in enacting "gun control" laws that require not only that same ID, but adding expensive classes, tests and very large fees for "the common folks" to rent their right to keep and bear arms back from the state. Hmm..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom