Neither side in an argument can find the truth when both make an absolute claim on it.
Whats that? Yes you can in fact, even as a public official, call for things not in or even against the Constitution and its protected in that same document. The SCOTUS determines what is constitutional or not and until its determined not to be Constitution by the SCOTUS or a lower court then its assume to be.
Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., said that she and other gun control advocates are considering a law that would create a program to purchase weapons from gun owners, a proposal that could be compulsory.
“We are also looking at a buy-back program,” Feinstein said today in a press conference. “Now, again, this is a work in progress so these are ideas in the development.”
Error | C-SPAN
Assault Weapons - Issues - United States Senator Dianne Feinstein
In the interview, Mr. Cuomo did not offer specifics about the measures he might propose, but, while discussing assault weapons, he said: “Confiscation could be an option. Mandatory sale to the state could be an option. Permitting could be an option — keep your gun but permit it.”
Keep your 'morals'...I will stand more on the Constitution and rights contained therein. And when it comes to a 'fight', I dont believe in fighting fair. I believe in winning. but lets not lose sight of the facts. It is the side you are defending and embracing that has announced their intention to abandon constitutional rights and demonstrated exactly how they intend to fight this fight. Its laughable that you think responding in kind is immoral.