Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20

Thread: Salon: A legal defense of donkey sex [W:18]

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Last Seen
    10-20-13 @ 04:50 AM
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    3,195

    Salon: A legal defense of donkey sex [W:18]

    A legal defense of donkey sex - Salon.com

    In a court motion, the defense claims that the state law against bestiality deprives 32-year-old Carlos Romero of his “personal liberty and autonomy when it comes to private intimate activities.
    Where do we draw the line with depravity?

  2. #2
    Sage
    Lutherf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Last Seen
    Today @ 10:51 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    24,703

    re: Salon: A legal defense of donkey sex [W:18]

    I don't have a good answer but would certainly suggest that it be drawn well out in front of donkey sex.

  3. #3
    Guru

    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Nevada
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    4,838

    re: Salon: A legal defense of donkey sex [W:18]

    That donkey wasn't even good looking.

  4. #4
    Antichrist
    zgoldsmith23's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    TN
    Last Seen
    11-06-17 @ 12:13 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    7,692

    Salon: A legal defense of donkey sex

    Someone misinterpreted "I wanna have sex with your ***."
    Quote Originally Posted by X Factor View Post
    I've never denied my own hackish tendencies
    Quote Originally Posted by Pin dÁr View Post
    scientific by itself isn't enough of course.
    Quote Originally Posted by blaxshep View Post
    Not all Nazis were bad people

  5. #5
    Tavern Bartender
    Pussy Grabbin' Beaver
    Middleground's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Canada's Capital
    Last Seen
    Today @ 11:47 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    22,459
    Blog Entries
    1

    re: Salon: A legal defense of donkey sex [W:18]

    Quote Originally Posted by Bronson View Post
    A legal defense of donkey sex - Salon.com



    Where do we draw the line with depravity?
    Did you even bother to read the ****ing article? If you did, then you would have NEVER come to the asinine conclusions you have. Jeepers, are people so lazy, they can't put forth the 'effort' it takes to read a few paragraphs and instead, just jump to lazy conclusions? I'd be more worried about that then donkey sex.


    But it’s actually not quite as crazy a move as it might seem. The lawyers aren’t arguing that Romero necessarily has a right to sex with donkeys, or any other farm animals for that matter. They’re specifically targeting the language of Florida’s anti-bestiality law, which does not require proof that an animal has been harmed or “of the sexual activity being non-consensual,” or even of penetrative sexual contact.
    “No men are anywhere, and I’m allowed to go in, because I’m the owner of the pageant and therefore I’m inspecting it,” Trump said... “‘Is everyone OK’? You know, they’re standing there with no clothes. ‘Is everybody OK?’ And you see these incredible looking women, and so I sort of get away with things like that.”

  6. #6
    Tavern Bartender
    Pussy Grabbin' Beaver
    Middleground's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Canada's Capital
    Last Seen
    Today @ 11:47 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    22,459
    Blog Entries
    1

    re: Salon: A legal defense of donkey sex [W:18]

    Quote Originally Posted by zgoldsmith23 View Post
    Someone misinterpreted "I wanna have sex with your ***."
    That's pretty brayzen for you to say.
    “No men are anywhere, and I’m allowed to go in, because I’m the owner of the pageant and therefore I’m inspecting it,” Trump said... “‘Is everyone OK’? You know, they’re standing there with no clothes. ‘Is everybody OK?’ And you see these incredible looking women, and so I sort of get away with things like that.”

  7. #7
    Libertarian socialist

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Staffs, England
    Last Seen
    12-13-17 @ 07:20 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Liberal
    Posts
    6,730

    re: Salon: A legal defense of donkey sex [W:18]

    Quote Originally Posted by Bronson View Post
    A legal defense of donkey sex - Salon.com



    Where do we draw the line with depravity?
    I think theres an animal cruelty argument here but otherwise people can be as depraved as they want.

  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Last Seen
    10-20-13 @ 04:50 AM
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    3,195

    re: Salon: A legal defense of donkey sex [W:18]

    Quote Originally Posted by Middleground View Post
    Did you even bother to read the ****ing article? If you did, then you would have NEVER come to the asinine conclusions you have. Jeepers, are people so lazy, they can't put forth the 'effort' it takes to read a few paragraphs and instead, just jump to lazy conclusions? I'd be more worried about that then donkey sex.
    Why are you getting all emotional and irrational?

    From the article:

    In a court motion, the defense claims that the state law against bestiality deprives 32-year-old Carlos Romero of his “personal liberty and autonomy when it comes to private intimate activities.

    It may be an opportunistic defense, sure, but it also brings up some interesting, if squirm-worthy, questions: Why should bestiality be illegal? Is it because it’s socially unacceptable or because it causes harm to animals? If it’s the latter, is it OK for people to have sexual contact with animals in cases where the animal isn’t harmed?
    So where's the counter argument? It's sad that there is even a need for one. You'd think that banning sex with animals would be a no brainer. The lawyers are stating that having sex with animals is basically none of our business. I don't see the author of this piece disagreeing with that, or making any attempt at all to refute it. Do you?

  9. #9
    Sage
    Hicup's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Last Seen
    12-07-17 @ 03:18 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    7,846

    re: Salon: A legal defense of donkey sex [W:18]

    Quote Originally Posted by Middleground View Post
    Did you even bother to read the ****ing article? If you did, then you would have NEVER come to the asinine conclusions you have. Jeepers, are people so lazy, they can't put forth the 'effort' it takes to read a few paragraphs and instead, just jump to lazy conclusions? I'd be more worried about that then donkey sex.

    Ummm, What? What sepcifically in your bolded quote isn't clear to you that his lawyers are arguing the language of the Florida beastiality laws as needing to rewquire proof that the animal has been harmed, or that there need proof that the sex with the animal is non-consensual, or "penetrative".. LOL

    So, what they are saying is that in order to find him guilty, they need to prove that it was harmful to the donkey, non-consensual, and or penetrative.

    Now, who's the one with a reading problem?


    Tim-
    “When buying and selling are controlled by legislation, the first things to be bought and sold are legislators.” - P. J. O’Rourke
    “Socialism is great until you run out of someone elses money” Margaret Thatcher

  10. #10
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Last Seen
    08-16-13 @ 02:48 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    970

    re: Salon: A legal defense of donkey sex [W:18]

    Quote Originally Posted by Middleground View Post
    Did you even bother to read the ****ing article? If you did, then you would have NEVER come to the asinine conclusions you have. Jeepers, are people so lazy, they can't put forth the 'effort' it takes to read a few paragraphs and instead, just jump to lazy conclusions? I'd be more worried about that then donkey sex.
    Oh the irony. You routinely demonstrate that the reading, it ain't one of your better skills. You were just in a thread doing exactly this same thing the other day. And adding your idiotic "like" to other posters, who just like you, found it too laborious to actually *read* and comprehend what the English in the article in the OP actually means, just like this thread. The one eyed Canadian Beaver Troll embarrasses herself again and again. You should change your avatar to the Energizer Bunny, still going.............

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •