Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20

Thread: Salon: A legal defense of donkey sex [W:18]

  1. #11
    Antichrist
    zgoldsmith23's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    TN
    Last Seen
    11-06-17 @ 12:13 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    7,692

    re: Salon: A legal defense of donkey sex [W:18]

    Maybe the laws should be changed... Didn't "god" grant Adam and Eve dominion over all the fish in the sea, fowl in the air, and every living thing?

    Heavy Petting, by Peter Singer
    Quote Originally Posted by X Factor View Post
    I've never denied my own hackish tendencies
    Quote Originally Posted by Pin dr View Post
    scientific by itself isn't enough of course.
    Quote Originally Posted by blaxshep View Post
    Not all Nazis were bad people

  2. #12
    Sage
    lpast's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Fla
    Last Seen
    05-21-16 @ 10:12 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    13,565

    re: Salon: A legal defense of donkey sex [W:18]

    We need to draw the line on lawyers...they will do and say anything to win, then hide behind...everyone deserves a vigorous defense.

  3. #13
    Sage
    Dittohead not!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    The Golden State
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 08:47 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    41,580

    re: Salon: A legal defense of donkey sex [W:18]

    Of course donkey sex is a necessary activity.

    If donkeys didn't have sex, pretty soon there would be no more donkeys.
    "Donald Trump is a phony, a fraud... [he's] playing the American public for suckers." Mitt Romney

  4. #14
    Tavern Bartender
    Pussy Grabbin' Beaver
    Middleground's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Canada's Capital
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 07:17 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    22,458
    Blog Entries
    1

    re: Salon: A legal defense of donkey sex [W:18]

    Quote Originally Posted by Bronson View Post
    Why are you getting all emotional and irrational?

    From the article:



    So where's the counter argument? It's sad that there is even a need for one. You'd think that banning sex with animals would be a no brainer. The lawyers are stating that having sex with animals is basically none of our business. I don't see the author of this piece disagreeing with that, or making any attempt at all to refute it. Do you?
    Maybe I misunderstood your intent with this from your OP:

    Where do we draw the line with depravity?
    What do you mean by this? Who, IYO, is/are the degenerate(s) AND:

    Salon: A legal defense of donkey sex
    Was it your intent to make it seem that the author/salon think that donkey sex is a-okay?
    No men are anywhere, and Im allowed to go in, because Im the owner of the pageant and therefore Im inspecting it, Trump said... Is everyone OK? You know, theyre standing there with no clothes. Is everybody OK? And you see these incredible looking women, and so I sort of get away with things like that.

  5. #15
    Tavern Bartender
    Pussy Grabbin' Beaver
    Middleground's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Canada's Capital
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 07:17 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    22,458
    Blog Entries
    1

    re: Salon: A legal defense of donkey sex [W:18]

    Quote Originally Posted by Hicup View Post
    Ummm, What? What sepcifically in your bolded quote isn't clear to you that his lawyers are arguing the language of the Florida beastiality laws as needing to rewquire proof that the animal has been harmed, or that there need proof that the sex with the animal is non-consensual, or "penetrative".. LOL

    So, what they are saying is that in order to find him guilty, they need to prove that it was harmful to the donkey, non-consensual, and or penetrative.

    Now, who's the one with a reading problem?


    Tim-
    Yes, I get that. I just want to make sure that Bronson does, and is not trying to point the finger at other people/entities. Heck, look at the thread title. Does that not strike you as a tactic straight out of James O'Keefe's playbook?
    No men are anywhere, and Im allowed to go in, because Im the owner of the pageant and therefore Im inspecting it, Trump said... Is everyone OK? You know, theyre standing there with no clothes. Is everybody OK? And you see these incredible looking women, and so I sort of get away with things like that.

  6. #16
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Last Seen
    08-16-13 @ 02:48 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    970

    re: Salon: A legal defense of donkey sex [W:18]

    Quote Originally Posted by Dittohead not! View Post
    Of course donkey sex is a necessary activity.

    If donkeys didn't have sex, pretty soon there would be no more donkeys.
    Except the topic here is humans having sex with Donkeys. Try to keep up.

    Quote Originally Posted by Middleground View Post
    Maybe I misunderstood your intent with this from your OP:



    What do you mean by this? Who, IYO, is/are the degenerate(s) AND:



    Was it your intent to make it seem that the author/salon think that donkey sex is a-okay?
    Could you be any more obtuse? The depravity he is quite obviously referring to is pretty obvious. But of course you are off an an idiotic tangent rather than addressing what the author of the OP did say. But then you have already demonstrated that just reading what was actually in the OP is far beyond your ability. Do you actually get paid something or just get some kind of tingle like pay off for being so obtuse with your trolling net?
    Last edited by Gie; 12-21-12 at 06:54 PM.

  7. #17
    Antichrist
    zgoldsmith23's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    TN
    Last Seen
    11-06-17 @ 12:13 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    7,692

    re: Salon: A legal defense of donkey sex [W:18]

    Quote Originally Posted by Middleground View Post
    Was it your intent to make it seem that the author/salon think that donkey sex is a-okay?
    I took care of that:

    Quote Originally Posted by zgoldsmith23 View Post
    Maybe the laws should be changed... Didn't "god" grant Adam and Eve dominion over all the fish in the sea, fowl in the air, and every living thing?

    Heavy Petting, by Peter Singer
    Quote Originally Posted by X Factor View Post
    I've never denied my own hackish tendencies
    Quote Originally Posted by Pin dr View Post
    scientific by itself isn't enough of course.
    Quote Originally Posted by blaxshep View Post
    Not all Nazis were bad people

  8. #18
    Global Moderator
    Silent Bob for President!

    RedAkston's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Last Seen
    Today @ 03:47 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    33,816
    Blog Entries
    4

    re: Salon: A legal defense of donkey sex [W:18]

    Moderator's Warning:
    Salon: A legal defense of donkey sex [W:18]Let's leave the personal attacks, insults and off-topic stuff out of this shall we?
    Welfare (Food Stamps, WIC, etc...) are not entitlements. They are taxpayer funded handouts and shouldn't be called entitlements at all. Social Security and Veteran's benefits are 'Entitlements' because the people receiving them are entitled to them. They were earned and paid for by the recipients.

  9. #19
    Dungeon Master
    Somewhere in Babylon
    Jetboogieman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Somewhere in Babylon...
    Last Seen
    @
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    24,322
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Salon: A legal defense of donkey sex [W:18]

    Has anyone actually considered the fact that his wife may just look like a donkey...

  10. #20
    User StubbornMoose's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Last Seen
    10-05-13 @ 10:41 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    55

    Re: Salon: A legal defense of donkey sex [W:18]

    If the donkey doesn't get off too then charge him with animal cruelty hehe

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •