• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

'As a black person it's always racial': Django Unchained star Jamie Foxx explains why

Re: 'As a black person it's always racial': Django Unchained star Jamie Foxx explains

Is it possible that, if most people use "racist" to describe what is actually 'paranoia', even if technically incorrect, is a sign the word is evolving to include said paranoia and that the dictionaries simply haven't caught up yet?

No disrespect intended . . . seriously . . . I have waited for this "Is it possible" question forever . . . I can't help it, but yes . . . it is possible, but is also possible that monkeys might jump out of my ass . . . it's possible but I doubt it will happen.
 
Re: 'As a black person it's always racial': Django Unchained star Jamie Foxx explains

I suppose, but it's more useful to know the right word. What we have are two separate concepts. To be racist is to believe in the superiority of one race over another. Superiority complexes need to be dealt with one way.

To be paranoid is to have delusions of persecution, and a general sense of mistrust.

Dealing with paranoia is different from how you would deal with someone with a superiority complex.
Right. But, for good or for bad, words and language evolve continuously.

Take the word "discrimination", for example. We ALL discriminate, every single day. To discriminate is simply to make a choice. Said choice can be completely benign. If I choose chocolate chip cookies over peanut butter cookies, I have made a choice, I have discriminated against peanut butter cookies. A completely neutral choice.

And the word still means that. However, in current popular use, it has taken on the meaning that it is a negative in reference to race or ethnic or gender views and/or "choices". And when people hear the word discrimination now, almost always the first image that comes into their mind is the current negative definition, not the original neutral definition.
 
Re: 'As a black person it's always racial': Django Unchained star Jamie Foxx explains

Not to nitpick... oh hell, I'm going to nitpick for a second.

"Discriminate" actually means "differentiate." It means to recognize a distinction between things. In that way, the word has nothing to do with making choices.

A discriminating gentleman chooses Rolex over Quartz watches, for example. That is, a man who can differentiate a good watch from a regular watch. To others, a watch is just a watch.

Some discriminate between Coke and Pepsi, preferring one to the other. Myself, I can't taste the difference.

When talking about race, discrimination is used in the same sense. Used correctly, it just means to recognize a distinction between races.



Right. But, for good or for bad, words and language evolve continuously.

Take the word "discrimination", for example. We ALL discriminate, every single day. To discriminate is simply to make a choice. Said choice can be completely benign. If I choose chocolate chip cookies over peanut butter cookies, I have made a choice, I have discriminated against peanut butter cookies. A completely neutral choice.

And the word still means that. However, in current popular use, it has taken on the meaning that it is a negative in reference to race or ethnic or gender views and/or "choices". And when people hear the word discrimination now, almost always the first image that comes into their mind is the current negative definition, not the original neutral definition.
 
Re: 'As a black person it's always racial': Django Unchained star Jamie Foxx explains

Not to nitpick... oh hell, I'm going to nitpick for a second.

"Discriminate" actually means "differentiate." It means to recognize a distinction between things. In that way, the word has nothing to do with making choices.

A discriminating gentleman chooses Rolex over Quartz watches, for example. That is, a man who can differentiate a good watch from a regular watch. To others, a watch is just a watch.

Some discriminate between Coke and Pepsi, preferring one to the other. Myself, I can't taste the difference.

When talking about race, discrimination is used in the same sense. Used correctly, it just means to recognize a distinction between races.
That too, but fair enough.

In my example, you're making choices based on the differences. (I used to have a more substantial example handy, but cannot find it now.)

Discriminate Synonyms, Discriminate Antonyms | Thesaurus.com

Main Entry: cull
Part of Speech: verb
Definition: pick out for reason
Synonyms: choose, discriminate, elect, extract, glean, mark, opt for, optate, pluck, prefer, select, sift, single out, take, thin, thin out, winnow
 
Re: 'As a black person it's always racial': Django Unchained star Jamie Foxx explains

Someone who is color blind cannot discriminate between green and yellow.

The word just means "to perceive a difference."

Someone who does not discriminate among human beings does not see a difference between black and white, male or female, etc.

Someone who does discriminate sees a difference between black and white, gay and straight, tall and short, etc.

The word really became popular during the civil rights movement. At that time, segregation was the key question... and the words are closely tied together.

In order to segregate based on race, one first has to discriminate based on race.

That too, but fair enough.

In my example, you're making choices based on the differences. (I used to have a more substantial example handy, but cannot find it now.)

Discriminate Synonyms, Discriminate Antonyms | Thesaurus.com

Main Entry: cull
Part of Speech: verb
Definition: pick out for reason
Synonyms: choose, discriminate, elect, extract, glean, mark, opt for, optate, pluck, prefer, select, sift, single out, take, thin, thin out, winnow
 
Re: 'As a black person it's always racial': Django Unchained star Jamie Foxx explains

Someone who is color blind cannot discriminate between green and yellow.

The word just means "to perceive a difference."

Someone who does not discriminate among human beings does not see a difference between black and white, male or female, etc.

Someone who does discriminate sees a difference between black and white, gay and straight, tall and short, etc.

The word really became popular during the civil rights movement. At that time, segregation was the key question... and the words are closely tied together.

In order to segregate based on race, one first has to discriminate based on race.
Right. That was my point... an example of how a word has changed/evolved from it's original meaning, and how that might be the process at work here with "racism". The specifics of how/why a word evolves isn't so much the point, but rather that words can and do evolve quite commonly.
 
Re: 'As a black person it's always racial': Django Unchained star Jamie Foxx explains

Well, the word "discriminate" didn't evolve, it means the same thing it did 100 years ago. That said, your overall point is right.... words do change meaning over time.

A racist is still someone who thinks one race is superior to another. Another way to describe a racist: a racial supremacist.

You can't say Jaime Foxx is a racial supremacist, at least not by his statements in the OP. He does come across as hyper-sensitive and paranoid, though.

Right. That was my point... an example of how a word has changed/evolved from it's original meaning, and how that might be the process at work here with "racism". The specifics of how/why a word evolves isn't so much the point, but rather that words can and do evolve quite commonly.
 
Re: 'As a black person it's always racial': Django Unchained star Jamie Foxx explains

And there you have it. The leftwing hero is a bonafide modern day racist.

Leftwing hero? layoff the kool aid, it is giving you more delusions. I must have missed all those jamie foxx for president signs, and his show on MSNBC. last i knew Foxx was a rather substandard comedian who made his career off of perpetuating the stereotype of the dumb ass black guy. I could see why you may think he is great because he substanitiates your bigotry and racism, but I don't really see him as much of a hero.

But, it is pretty much to be expected by you to make up crazy baseless accusations like this. As for him being racist, i think i would accept his ideas that he has encountered racism throughout his life as being far more accurate than the opposing claims by a known racist and overwhelming right wing propaganda liar like yourself. He had to live with being black, and you live in some alternate reality called faux news imaginationland. He may suck as an actor and comedian, but he knows a hell of a lot more about being black than you do.
 
Re: 'As a black person it's always racial': Django Unchained star Jamie Foxx explains

I wish I had seen this earlier.

His comments are not far from the truth. As a black man we are under a stigma. I have watched people cross the street because they are scared. My wife and daughter were refused an upgraded room on the basis of the racist counter clerk. I mean people can say it is not that prevalent, but it is. It is just harder to notice because people keep it under raps for fear of reprisals.

In fact I agree with him. I notice little things like the Chicago Fireman in my scuba class who is friendly to everyone but me. Would not even talk to me if he could avoid it. The cop who stopped me and searched my bag for not other reason than I was walking down the street coming form work in the early morning. These are things most white people don't see or have to put up with. Getting pulled over constantly because I was driving a Conquest Tsi and black. No other reason to pull me over, none. In a conversation with Mac he brought up the constant stupid questions like "why do blacks do "insert stupid stereo type" from white friends and acquaintances. They don't mean to be insulting, but it is. Hell I have friends on Facebook from childhood who make comments like "you are black? when did this happen" and similar jokes because I don't speak Ebonics or listen to rap. They are just being funny and think it's a joke. They have no idea how insulting it actually is. Like the music I listen to defines me as a person.

You can say it's racist all you want, but it's not. It is just an unfortunate stigma that black males deal with our entire lives here in the good old USA.

If you think that is racist, well hehehe **** you and the horse you road in on.
 
Re: 'As a black person it's always racial': Django Unchained star Jamie Foxx explains

I would say the personal issues are as much your way as the other. Extremes either way don't help the situation... too sensitive or incredibly insensitive. FYI I don't recall anyone asking you so your posting in this thread indicates you do see at least some ado to it. ;)

I suppose I did make a little ado about it didnt I. Oh well.
 
Re: 'As a black person it's always racial': Django Unchained star Jamie Foxx explains

I wish I had seen this earlier.

His comments are not far from the truth. As a black man we are under a stigma. I have watched people cross the street because they are scared. My wife and daughter were refused an upgraded room on the basis of the racist counter clerk. I mean people can say it is not that prevalent, but it is. It is just harder to notice because people keep it under raps for fear of reprisals.

In fact I agree with him. I notice little things like the Chicago Fireman in my scuba class who is friendly to everyone but me. Would not even talk to me if he could avoid it. The cop who stopped me and searched my bag for not other reason than I was walking down the street coming form work in the early morning. These are things most white people don't see or have to put up with. Getting pulled over constantly because I was driving a Conquest Tsi and black. No other reason to pull me over, none. In a conversation with Mac he brought up the constant stupid questions like "why do blacks do "insert stupid stereo type" from white friends and acquaintances. They don't mean to be insulting, but it is. Hell I have friends on Facebook from childhood who make comments like "you are black? when did this happen" and similar jokes because I don't speak Ebonics or listen to rap. They are just being funny and think it's a joke. They have no idea how insulting it actually is. Like the music I listen to defines me as a person.

You can say it's racist all you want, but it's not. It is just an unfortunate stigma that black males deal with our entire lives here in the good old USA.

If you think that is racist, well hehehe **** you and the horse you road in on.

You didn't read the article. First he runs around acting white or acting black, then he makes his living off of acting the stereotype. He bitches and perpetuates it. Bitches about fried chicken, well I happen to like it.
 
Re: 'As a black person it's always racial': Django Unchained star Jamie Foxx explains

I haven't come across a situation in which a white person experiences racism for their entire life the way a black person might, can you give me an example so I understand?

South Africa. Whites were killed in droves for their property. You know, the property that is supposed to be theirs by right.
 
Re: 'As a black person it's always racial': Django Unchained star Jamie Foxx explains

South Africa. Whites were killed in droves for their property. You know, the property that is supposed to be theirs by right.

Considering the way blacks were treated for how long? That is a piss poor example.
 
Re: 'As a black person it's always racial': Django Unchained star Jamie Foxx explains

You didn't read the article. First he runs around acting white or acting black, then he makes his living off of acting the stereotype. He bitches and perpetuates it. Bitches about fried chicken, well I happen to like it.

That has little to do with why I agree. Society created the stereotypes he plays, not him. He makes a living doing it. This makes it no less a problem I and other black men deal with on a daily bases. It sucks but I choose not to whine about it for the most part, but that does not mean it is not there. I mean racism comes from all sides no matter what color you are. The difference is black men have a societal stigma attached to us we can't seem to shake. It follows us around like a thick could and is forever present. It makes it hard sometimes to tell what is racist and what was simply human nature or even a simple mistake.

It sucks man, really. Like I said though, I don't worry about it to much. I am comfortable in my own skin and know their is nothing you can't do here in the US if you put your mind to it. Racism is no excuse for failure. This does not mean it's not here or that we don't feel it.
 
Re: 'As a black person it's always racial': Django Unchained star Jamie Foxx explains

You didn't read the article. First he runs around acting white or acting black, then he makes his living off of acting the stereotype. He bitches and perpetuates it. Bitches about fried chicken, well I happen to like it.

That has little to do with why I agree. Society created the stereotypes he plays, not him. He makes a living doing it. This makes it no less a problem I and other black men deal with on a daily bases. It sucks but I choose not to whine about it for the most part, but that does not mean it is not there. I mean racism comes from all sides no matter what color you are. The difference is black men have a societal stigma attached to us we can't seem to shake. It follows us around like a thick could and is forever present. It makes it hard sometimes to tell what is racist and what was simply human nature or even a simple mistake.

It sucks man, really. Like I said though, I don't worry about it to much. I am comfortable in my own skin and know their is nothing you can't do here in the US if you put your mind to it. Racism is no excuse for failure. This does not mean it's not here or that we don't feel it.
 
Re: 'As a black person it's always racial': Django Unchained star Jamie Foxx explains

Considering the way blacks were treated for how long? That is a piss poor example.

That is not the issue. You asked for an example where whites are being abused, killed and disowned by the government which they also support and in a country in which they are equal citizens as the others. before the apartheid ended, blacks were lacking certain rights.

So in other words. If 2 men are equal citizens under the law, one black and one white, there is no reason for one citizen to get away with with murder if he kills a white man.

But if there are 2 men who are not equal under the law, then the dynamic changes. As long as one is not covered by the rights that the other has, there is no illegality. It may be immoral... but there is no illegality. So the fact that blacks weren't allowed to enter certain public offices in south africa during apartheid, no laws were broken. So there is no law that punishes people for not letting blacks be part of government. It is immoral, certainly, but law has nothing to do with morality. but once apartheid fell, such actions would be criminal and prosecuted under the law.

Got it? There are differences and they matter. And there is no excuse for the mass killings and abuses decent white people in south africa, who weren't part of the ruling elite, to suffer what they did. Because they were the ones who suffered. Most of the ones who were part of the ruling class either fled the country or were granted special privileges... or were put in prison. But the down to earth white man, who had his family and minded his own business, living in accordance to the law, shouldn't have had to pay the price because some blacks decided that all that white man had, wasn't his ,despite the fact that he owned it. Legally, morally and any other way you want.
 
Re: 'As a black person it's always racial': Django Unchained star Jamie Foxx explains

That is not the issue. You asked for an example where whites are being abused, killed and disowned by the government which they also support and in a country in which they are equal citizens as the others. before the apartheid ended, blacks were lacking certain rights.

No I did not. And lacking in certain rights? Lacking in certain rights? Is that a nice way of saying being imprisoned unfairly, refused equal education, housing etc? I mean come on.

So in other words. If 2 men are equal citizens under the law, one black and one white, there is no reason for one citizen to get away with with murder if he kills a white man.

I agree no matter how much in the case of South Africa, revenge was to be expected.

But if there are 2 men who are not equal under the law, then the dynamic changes. As long as one is not covered by the rights that the other has, there is no illegality. It may be immoral... but there is no illegality.

May be immoral? lol.

So the fact that blacks weren't allowed to enter certain public offices in south africa during apartheid, no laws were broken. So there is no law that punishes people for not letting blacks be part of government. It is immoral, certainly, but law has nothing to do with morality. but once apartheid fell, such actions would be criminal and prosecuted under the law.

That is a bull**** excuse for supporting institutionalized racism, nothing more.


Yep and since I did not ask you ****, I will say again...

Piss poor example.

There are differences and they matter. And there is no excuse for the mass killings and abuses decent white people in south africa, who weren't part of the ruling elite, to suffer what they did.

I agree. It is however a fact of life they would want revenge for YEARS of a brutal regime that treated them like second class citizens which included murder etc. So in this case the law could kiss there black asses.

Because they were the ones who suffered. Most of the ones who were part of the ruling class either fled the country or were granted special privileges... or were put in prison. But the down to earth white man, who had his family and minded his own business, living in accordance to the law, shouldn't have had to pay the price because some blacks decided that all that white man had, wasn't his ,despite the fact that he owned it. Legally, morally and any other way you want.

I agree. Again this is a piss poor example as it should have been expected. It is unrealistic and silly to think this was not going to happen.

PS those whites did not experience anything like the blacks their whole lives, period.
 
Re: 'As a black person it's always racial': Django Unchained star Jamie Foxx explains

No I did not. And lacking in certain rights? Lacking in certain rights? Is that a nice way of saying being imprisoned unfairly, refused equal education, housing etc? I mean come on.

I agree no matter how much in the case of South Africa, revenge was to be expected.

May be immoral? lol.

That is a bull**** excuse for supporting institutionalized racism, nothing more.

Yep and since I did not ask you ****, I will say again...

Piss poor example.

I agree. It is however a fact of life they would want revenge for YEARS of a brutal regime that treated them like second class citizens which included murder etc. So in this case the law could kiss there black asses.

I agree. Again this is a piss poor example as it should have been expected. It is unrealistic and silly to think this was not going to happen.

PS those whites did not experience anything like the blacks their whole lives, period.


Ok. Well, not my fault there no great african civilizations that could stand the test of time.
But there are plenty of other examples in the world.

In India, you had the Murghal Empire in the XVIIIth century.

Today in Tibet, under Chinesse rule.

And many more examples of actual institutionalized racism in history and the world.

However, the US is not on that list as is no western nation and hasn't been, for the most part, for almost 2 centuries in Europe and decades in the US.

However, you seem hell bent on discovering racism everywhere and putting everything on it. Fine. I gave a reply to such a mentality several times on this forum and I will pose to you the same answer if you are willing to believe all this nonsense about racism in the US. This is the comment:
-----------

Some people keep on holding that torch that says that blacks are underpriviledged and the victims of racism, especially from white males and all those fake, bull**** stereotypes. The white man holding down the black man where as that just isn't true.

There are black congressmen(and even the president). There are black CEOs (i.e. the CEO of Mcdonalds is a black man). There are black movie stars and millionaires and billionaires and everything. So do tell me how come there is still racism?

You know what is racist? Eric Holder refusing to put the black panther party on trial because it would denigrate "his people". That is real racism right there.

You know what else is racist? The KKK in the 1930's.
You know what else is racist? The fact that in California, mexicans and blacks are the most violent crime victims of each other. That means that blacks get killed mostly by mexicans in violent crimes and viceversa.

You know what else is racist? Claiming that racism is influencing every aspect of your life and you encounter it keeping you down every day despite living in showbis, the most liberal environment in the ENTIRE world. The ENTIRE world.

With this in mind, I would like to make the following proposition.

Given the following evidence.

A) There are prominent blacks in all aspects of public life (government, congress, etc)
B) There are prominent blacks in all aspect of intellectual life (thomas sowell, Neil degrasse tyson, the most popular ones)
C) There are prominent blacks in sports (you name it)
D) There are prominent blacks in business (CEO of Mcdonalds and Xerox-> its even a black woman)
E) There are prominent blacks in showbis, the most liberal environemnt in the world.
F) Everywhere in general... you can find prominent blacks

And yet, despite all these things being TRUE, there is still racism, and racism is in fact a MAJOR problem in the world, even in the MOST LIBERAL PLACE in the world, then the only logical conclusion to derive from this is the following: That racism is part and parcel of human nature. In fact, it is impossible to be human without being a racist, and this is equally valid for all races. In fact, it is inhumane to not be a racist because despite even the most equalitarian ideologies being shoved down people's throats in all aspects of life, racism still prevails even in the most heavily influenced areas of those ideologies. Therefore, racism is above everything in power and can NEVER be removed from humanity and therefore it will always be there as a staple, as the essence of what it means to be a human.
Again, this is only if all above are TRUE, which they are.

If you do not want the above theorem to be valid, then we just have to agree that Jamie Foxxx, like many others, are just stupid racists.
------

Do reply to it, especially the latter part with the A B C D E F statements and the logical conclusion that follows.
 
Re: 'As a black person it's always racial': Django Unchained star Jamie Foxx explains

Ok. Well, not my fault there no great african civilizations that could stand the test of time.
But there are plenty of other examples in the world.

Well colonialism sort of cut that off before they even had the chance. It also destroyed the great West African nations that were on that path. Not that this is somehow your fault?

In India, you had the Murghal Empire in the XVIIIth century.

Today in Tibet, under Chinesse rule.

And many more examples of actual institutionalized racism in history and the world.

However, the US is not on that list as is no western nation and hasn't been, for the most part, for almost 2 centuries in Europe and decades in the US.

However, you seem hell bent on discovering racism everywhere and putting everything on it. Fine. I gave a reply to such a mentality several times on this forum and I will pose to you the same answer if you are willing to believe all this nonsense about racism in the US. This is the comment:

What? Slavery in the US was abolished in 1865, only 147 years ago. Now lets add in the Jim crow years and the fight for equality or civil rights movement and you are talking within my lifetime or less than 50 years ago. So I can honestly say that statement is utter blind bull****.

Then you talk about I see it in everything? WTF? That is an asinine statement. I did however grow up in it, what the hell do you know about it? What did you do read a newspaper? Or did you get an official announcement? I mean yes I do see it, but not in everything. Nice hyperbole.

You walk into an office and you see nothing but white men, a couple of women in all the side offices. Then you look at the cubicles in the middle and it's all Indians, Pakistanis, females and blacks. With black men being the least represented. You tell me what am I supposed to think? When I go to an interview after talking to the person on the phone, and they say "Oh! You didn't sound black over the phone." You tell me? What am I supposed to think.

-----------
Some people keep on holding that torch that says that blacks are underpriviledged and the victims of racism, especially from white males and all those fake, bull**** stereotypes. The white man holding down the black man where as that just isn't true.

Yes that's true. Which is why I said...

I am comfortable in my own skin and know their is nothing you can't do here in the US if you put your mind to it. Racism is no excuse for failure. - Blackdog

So don't even think about casting me in any such light.

There are black congressmen(and even the president). There are black CEOs (i.e. the CEO of Mcdonalds is a black man). There are black movie stars and millionaires and billionaires and everything. So do tell me how come there is still racism?

You have got to be kidding? We elected a black president! Racism ended officially 4 and a half years ago! You mite want to inform all those people that called the president a nigger and said we need to get rid of the nigger in the white house and tell them racism no longer exists.

You know what is racist? Eric Holder refusing to put the black panther party on trial because it would denigrate "his people". That is real racism right there.

Yes it is. Has nothing to do with anything I said, but yes I think it was racially motivated. I mean hell there are plenty of racist black people. The whole Zimmerman thing should be proof of that.

You know what else is racist? The KKK in the 1930's.
You know what else is racist? The fact that in California, mexicans and blacks are the most violent crime victims of each other. That means that blacks get killed mostly by mexicans in violent crimes and viceversa.

So what? Again has nothing to do with anything I aid.

You know what else is racist? Claiming that racism is influencing every aspect of your life and you encounter it keeping you down every day despite living in showbis, the most liberal environment in the ENTIRE world. The ENTIRE world.

Ummmm no place in the article did he say anything about anything keeping him down and niether did I. You seem to be the one with a chip on your shoulder.

With this in mind, I would like to make the following proposition.

Given the following evidence.

A) There are prominent blacks in all aspects of public life (government, congress, etc)
B) There are prominent blacks in all aspect of intellectual life (thomas sowell, Neil degrasse tyson, the most popular ones)
C) There are prominent blacks in sports (you name it)
D) There are prominent blacks in business (CEO of Mcdonalds and Xerox-> its even a black woman)
E) There are prominent blacks in showbis, the most liberal environemnt in the world.
F) Everywhere in general... you can find prominent blacks

And yet, despite all these things being TRUE, there is still racism, and racism is in fact a MAJOR problem in the world, even in the MOST LIBERAL PLACE in the world, then the only logical conclusion to derive from this is the following: That racism is part and parcel of human nature. In fact, it is impossible to be human without being a racist, and this is equally valid for all races. In fact, it is inhumane to not be a racist because despite even the most equalitarian ideologies being shoved down people's throats in all aspects of life, racism still prevails even in the most heavily influenced areas of those ideologies. Therefore, racism is above everything in power and can NEVER be removed from humanity and therefore it will always be there as a staple, as the essence of what it means to be a human.
Again, this is only if all above are TRUE, which they are.

If you do not want the above theorem to be valid, then we just have to agree that Jamie Foxxx, like many others, are just stupid racists.

Total unadulterated bull****. No, you are completely wrong. Just because blacks are represented in something it has no correlation to, or on racism at all. I mean seriously it has gotten better, but it has not gone away. You seem to think that all of a sudden because a black man is successful, all racism must be gone. Well I tell you what, I want some of what you are smoking.

Do reply to it, especially the latter part with the A B C D E F statements and the logical conclusion that follows.

Nothing logical about that fallacy leap at all, nothing.
 
Last edited:
Re: 'As a black person it's always racial': Django Unchained star Jamie Foxx explains

1)Well colonialism sort of cut that off before they even had the chance. It also destroyed the great West African nations that were on that path. Not that this is somehow your fault?



2)What? Slavery in the US was abolished in 1865, only 147 years ago. Now lets add in the Jim crow years and the fight for equality or civil rights movement and you are talking within my lifetime or less than 50 years ago. So I can honestly say that statement is utter blind bull****.

3)Then you talk about I see it in everything? WTF? That is an asinine statement. I did however grow up in it, what the hell do you know about it? What did you do read a newspaper? Or did you get an official announcement? I mean yes I do see it, but not in everything. Nice hyperbole.

You walk into an office and you see nothing but white men, a couple of women in all the side offices. Then you look at the cubicles in the middle and it's all Indians, Pakistanis, females and blacks. With black men being the least represented. You tell me what am I supposed to think? When I go to an interview after talking to the person on the phone, and they say "Oh! You didn't sound black over the phone." You tell me? What am I supposed to think.

4)Yes that's true. Which is why I said...

I am comfortable in my own skin and know their is nothing you can't do here in the US if you put your mind to it. Racism is no excuse for failure. - Blackdog

So don't even think about casting me in any such light.

5)You have got to be kidding? We elected a black president! Racism ended officially 4 and a half years ago! You mite want to inform all those people that called the president a nigger and said we need to get rid of the nigger in the white house and tell them racism no longer exists.

6)Yes it is. Has nothing to do with anything I said, but yes I think it was racially motivated. I mean hell there are plenty of racist black people. The whole Zimmerman thing should be proof of that.

[]

7)
Total unadulterated bull****. No, you are completely wrong. Just because blacks are represented in something it has no correlation to, or on racism at all. I mean seriously it has gotten better, but it has not gone away. You seem to think that all of a sudden because a black man is successful, all racism must be gone. Well I tell you what, I want some of what you are smoking.

Nothing logical about that fallacy leap at all, nothing.

1) there were parts of Africa where people hadn't invented the wheel yet. Yes, there were countries in west africa which grew rich through the slave trade. African kings and warlords were the foremost players in the slave trade, providing the "merchandise" in massive numbers in order to acquire wealth to fund their armies which in turn, would raid more and make more slaves.

2) Yes. Well, European nations which had slavery had abolished it a few decades before that which is why I said, almost 2 centuries. And thanks to the colonial empires of some European nations, slavery was ended almost worldwide. The civil rights movement in the USA was a long time coming, but blacks were represented in Congress and had men who could make laws. It is an equal failure on both the sides of the black community and the white community in the US that only in the 1960's had true equal rights been observed for the black minority. But lets not forget that even before the black civil liberation movement, there were organization that fought for blacks, like the NAACP which was founded decades before MLK Jr started his legacy.

3) think what you will. NAACP, affirmative action... they exist. You have no argument there. In my opinion, there is no reason why companies should cater to racial groups in the first place.

4) More on this later, point 7). You can either accept that racism is mostly BS on institutional level and that all the crybabies on TV complaining about racism in every day of their lives about how racism messes with every single thing in their lives... from photoshoots (article) to how they have to act around white people.

Also, this isn't about you.

5) More on this on point 7), your objections are noted and will be addressed there.

6) yep. so, this is the end of this point.

7) OK. So I had this conversation with others before and therefore, you are either refusing to think about what I wrote, or you are just too stubborn.

Lets see.

Despite the fact that these statements are true
A) There are prominent blacks in all aspects of public life (government, congress, etc)
B) There are prominent blacks in all aspect of intellectual life (thomas sowell, Neil degrasse tyson, the most popular ones)
C) There are prominent blacks in sports (you name it)
D) There are prominent blacks in business (CEO of Mcdonalds and Xerox-> its even a black woman)
E) There are prominent blacks in showbis, the most liberal environemnt in the world.
F) Everywhere in general... you can find prominent blacks
-
G) Despite the fact that there are huge penalties for a person who displays racism (you can lose your job), people still display racist attitudes and take on the stigma which haunts people for ages. An example is even with the most loved of people, Ron Paul, was hounded by statements that were considered racist from over 30 years ago. This stigma never leaves you and there are huge consequences.
-
Because they are. You cannot question the reality that these statements are true.

Yet we have evidence of racism everywhere. You pointed the example where those people posted on twitter to get then nigger out of office. Great. This is another example that just goes enforces the theory I presented in the above statement, which is G)

Therefore. If all statements above are true, which they are... then the only logical conclusion is the one i made.

That in fact, racism is a deep part of what it means to be a human. It is embedded so deep in our DNA that like any other natural thing we feel, hunger, cold, etc, it cannot be suppressed no matter how much ideology and public pressure there is. Therefore, attacking racism is in fact attacking the very essence of humanity. It is like blaming people because they get hungry or cold. No different. Otherwise, if it race were a "social construct", it could be destroyed by social means.

It is no different then bootlegging was in the 1920's with alcohol prohibition. A lot of people became bootleggers back then because there was such a demand. The social construct called "alcohol smuggler" was created and to fight it, you had prohibition agents. But once you abolished prohibition, there was no incentive to do smuggling of alcohol and the social construct known as "alcohol smuggler" ended and so did the fight against it.

So, in the past, when racism wasn't penalized, the social construct of "race' was beneficial to people and there was incentive to keep it. But now, because "racist" is such a detrimental stigma on a person, there should be no more incentive to be a racist and hence, the social construct should no longer exist. And racism should no longer exist... if it is a social construct... and add to that the fact that the world we live in, the mindset, the ideology is very strong AGAINST racism. Therefore, since racism still exists, we must accept that it is a force STRONGER than any ideology and it is NOT a social construct. And the only thing that can explain this is that it is part and parcel of human nature. that it is in fact crucial... or a vital part of humanity that it cannot be ignore, repressed or supressed for long periods of time because it will arise despite being penalized for showing racism. Just like you can starve yourself in time, racism can also be held donw... controlled. but because it is such a powerful part of humanity, it will always rise up and take hold.

Therefore, if you agree with the notion that there is still racism, again, despite EVERYTHING being against it, then we must accept that racism is part of us and can NEVER be diminished or destroyed under the current circumstances. And to fight against racism or to condemn racism is actually to condemn the very core humanity. All humanity.

So what will your stance be.
 
Re: 'As a black person it's always racial': Django Unchained star Jamie Foxx explains

1) there were parts of Africa where people hadn't invented the wheel yet. Yes, there were countries in west africa which grew rich through the slave trade. African kings and warlords were the foremost players in the slave trade, providing the "merchandise" in massive numbers in order to acquire wealth to fund their armies which in turn, would raid more and make more slaves.

2) Yes. Well, European nations which had slavery had abolished it a few decades before that which is why I said, almost 2 centuries. And thanks to the colonial empires of some European nations, slavery was ended almost worldwide. The civil rights movement in the USA was a long time coming, but blacks were represented in Congress and had men who could make laws. It is an equal failure on both the sides of the black community and the white community in the US that only in the 1960's had true equal rights been observed for the black minority. But lets not forget that even before the black civil liberation movement, there were organization that fought for blacks, like the NAACP which was founded decades before MLK Jr started his legacy.

3) think what you will. NAACP, affirmative action... they exist. You have no argument there. In my opinion, there is no reason why companies should cater to racial groups in the first place.

4) More on this later, point 7). You can either accept that racism is mostly BS on institutional level and that all the crybabies on TV complaining about racism in every day of their lives about how racism messes with every single thing in their lives... from photoshoots (article) to how they have to act around white people.

Also, this isn't about you.

5) More on this on point 7), your objections are noted and will be addressed there.

6) yep. so, this is the end of this point.

7) OK. So I had this conversation with others before and therefore, you are either refusing to think about what I wrote, or you are just too stubborn.

Lets see.

Despite the fact that these statements are true
A) There are prominent blacks in all aspects of public life (government, congress, etc)
B) There are prominent blacks in all aspect of intellectual life (thomas sowell, Neil degrasse tyson, the most popular ones)
C) There are prominent blacks in sports (you name it)
D) There are prominent blacks in business (CEO of Mcdonalds and Xerox-> its even a black woman)
E) There are prominent blacks in showbis, the most liberal environemnt in the world.
F) Everywhere in general... you can find prominent blacks
-
G) Despite the fact that there are huge penalties for a person who displays racism (you can lose your job), people still display racist attitudes and take on the stigma which haunts people for ages. An example is even with the most loved of people, Ron Paul, was hounded by statements that were considered racist from over 30 years ago. This stigma never leaves you and there are huge consequences.
-
Because they are. You cannot question the reality that these statements are true.

Yet we have evidence of racism everywhere. You pointed the example where those people posted on twitter to get then nigger out of office. Great. This is another example that just goes enforces the theory I presented in the above statement, which is G)

Therefore. If all statements above are true, which they are... then the only logical conclusion is the one i made.

That in fact, racism is a deep part of what it means to be a human. It is embedded so deep in our DNA that like any other natural thing we feel, hunger, cold, etc, it cannot be suppressed no matter how much ideology and public pressure there is. Therefore, attacking racism is in fact attacking the very essence of humanity. It is like blaming people because they get hungry or cold. No different. Otherwise, if it race were a "social construct", it could be destroyed by social means.

It is no different then bootlegging was in the 1920's with alcohol prohibition. A lot of people became bootleggers back then because there was such a demand. The social construct called "alcohol smuggler" was created and to fight it, you had prohibition agents. But once you abolished prohibition, there was no incentive to do smuggling of alcohol and the social construct known as "alcohol smuggler" ended and so did the fight against it.

So, in the past, when racism wasn't penalized, the social construct of "race' was beneficial to people and there was incentive to keep it. But now, because "racist" is such a detrimental stigma on a person, there should be no more incentive to be a racist and hence, the social construct should no longer exist. And racism should no longer exist... if it is a social construct... and add to that the fact that the world we live in, the mindset, the ideology is very strong AGAINST racism. Therefore, since racism still exists, we must accept that it is a force STRONGER than any ideology and it is NOT a social construct. And the only thing that can explain this is that it is part and parcel of human nature. that it is in fact crucial... or a vital part of humanity that it cannot be ignore, repressed or supressed for long periods of time because it will arise despite being penalized for showing racism. Just like you can starve yourself in time, racism can also be held donw... controlled. but because it is such a powerful part of humanity, it will always rise up and take hold.

Therefore, if you agree with the notion that there is still racism, again, despite EVERYTHING being against it, then we must accept that racism is part of us and can NEVER be diminished or destroyed under the current circumstances. And to fight against racism or to condemn racism is actually to condemn the very core humanity. All humanity.

So what will your stance be.

I already covered most of this. You are just repeating yourself at this point. Racism exists and it is a cultural phenomenon that is not going away anytime soon.

Your reasoning is flawed because a black person being successful is not a factor in racism. Blacks were successful prior to the civil rights movement through hard work etc. You are completely and utterly blinded by your own bigotry in this. I mean look at your own comments like "think what you will. NAACP, affirmative action... they exist. You have no argument there. So because of affirmative action laws and the NAACP, the racism I experienced directly and still do is invalid? What kind of moronic crap is that?

Every black person on this forum including the stanchest black conservative can tell you racism is alive and well in the US. The fact that you want to deny this because some blacks are successful is absolutely stupefying, I mean really.

You need to get a grip on reality and stop pretending racism just vanished because Obama was elected.
 
Re: 'As a black person it's always racial': Django Unchained star Jamie Foxx explains

I already covered most of this. You are just repeating yourself at this point. Racism exists and it is a cultural phenomenon that is not going away anytime soon.

Your reasoning is flawed because a black person being successful is not a factor in racism. Blacks were successful prior to the civil rights movement through hard work etc. You are completely and utterly blinded by your own bigotry in this. I mean look at your own comments like "think what you will. NAACP, affirmative action... they exist. You have no argument there. So because of affirmative action laws and the NAACP, the racism I experienced directly and still do is invalid? What kind of moronic crap is that?

Every black person on this forum including the stanchest black conservative can tell you racism is alive and well in the US. The fact that you want to deny this because some blacks are successful is absolutely stupefying, I mean really.

You need to get a grip on reality and stop pretending racism just vanished because Obama was elected.

It is not bigotry at all. And your personal experiences are of no consequence to this discussion. It is not about you. Stop making it about you.

Secondly, the fact that there are successful black people is proof that nobody is holding people down. the white man is not holding the black man down. People rise to the top and fall down to the bottom mostly based on who they are as people, not as what race they are.

Thirdly, this is exactly my point. That racism exists and is alive and well because it is an integral part of human nature if you believe the above statements to be true. And therefore, you can never get rid of racism because racism is embedded deep within each and every human being, of any race, on the planet. A fight against racism is a fight against humanity itself. This is explained all in the above comment i made. It is therefore not a cultural phenomenon, but an inherent human phenomenon.
 
Re: 'As a black person it's always racial': Django Unchained star Jamie Foxx explains

It is not bigotry at all. And your personal experiences are of no consequence to this discussion. It is not about you. Stop making it about you.

I am not making it about me. It is however about the things I and many other blacks experience. My experiences are nothing more than an example.

Secondly, the fact that there are successful black people is proof that nobody is holding people down. the white man is not holding the black man down. People rise to the top and fall down to the bottom mostly based on who they are as people, not as what race they are.

No one including the article said anything about any white person holding anyone down, except YOU.

Thirdly, this is exactly my point. That racism exists and is alive and well because it is an integral part of human nature if you believe the above statements to be true.

Hogwash. Because black people have become successful has nothing at all to do with racism, period. It is not the cause or relevant to success.

And therefore, you can never get rid of racism because racism is embedded deep within each and every human being, of any race, on the planet. A fight against racism is a fight against humanity itself. This is explained all in the above comment i made. It is therefore not a cultural phenomenon, but an inherent human phenomenon.

So in other words you believe your racism is born? I have some bad news for you, you are just a racist because you want to be. Racism is not born, it is taught. It is no more a part of human nature than liking a specific car etc.

Wow, just wow. Go back to stormfront. Maybe they will except your harebrained excuse to be racist.

PS I am not racist, a majority of the folks here appear to be well adjusted and not racist. So no, again hogwash.
 
Last edited:
Re: 'As a black person it's always racial': Django Unchained star Jamie Foxx explains

You didn't read the article. First he runs around acting white or acting black, then he makes his living off of acting the stereotype. He bitches and perpetuates it. Bitches about fried chicken, well I happen to like it.

An excuse to criticize Foxx at best. How many times has a 'conservative' reminded the rest of us that actors and comedians are just playing a part. We shouldn't believe the part they play is the real person. I suppose any actor portraying a stereotype can't criticize society continuing to feed that stereotype to the PERSON? Carroll O'Connor can't criticize bigoted white men. Rod Steiger can't criticize the segregationist South because he won national fame as an 'old school' southern sheriff? No 'villain' can criticize violence?

Weak Tea at best...
 
Re: 'As a black person it's always racial': Django Unchained star Jamie Foxx explains

I am not making it about me. It is however about the things I and many other blacks experience. My experiences are nothing more than an example.

No one including the article said anything about any white person holding anyone down, except YOU.

Hogwash. Because black people have become successful has nothing at all to do with racism, period. It is not the cause or relevant to success.

So in other words you believe your racism is born? I have some bad news for you, you are just a racist because you want to be. Racism is not born, it is taught. It is no more a part of human nature than liking a specific car etc.

Wow, just wow. Go back to stormfront. Maybe they will except your harebrained excuse to be racist.

So, your experiences are universal? You are a spokesperson for the black community then. <sarcasm>

Also. you are triviliazing a complex issue, which is why it is still an issue.

Unlike you, I am not stating anything to a certainty. I am just providing context and theories.

You are the one who apparently, is either unable to understand complex ideas or is unwilling to. Either way, it is not good for you. And not good for the conversation.

Do go back and read the comments we had. I have clearly stated that if the things I wrote nicely in A B C D... etc are true. Then the only logical conclusion is that which I made. I have never stated that I agree with the theories I put forward. They are just logical conclusions. Your replies have proven to me that you are unable to understand them and thus, can only ignore them or trivialize them, both courses of actions lead to your discrediting as a serious debater.
Add that to the fact you are constantly making it about "me" and "you" when such a debate should be about ideas and the way they are implemented in public. You are even now returning to the same "silver bullet" strategy of calling me a racist because you cannot come up with a viable alternative to what is happening. You cannot explain it. You are criticizing the "status quo" of racial relations and provide no notions as to why it exists. It cannot be something that is taught because if it is something that is taught then the social climate is against you. Racism and racists are criticized and persecuted every single time in social and public life. it is discouraged. yet it persists. Therefore, the logical conclusion is that the root of racism is something stronger than just mindset... then just teaching. And the only thing stronger than ideology is the natural human condition.

If you cannot come up with serious replies and arguments for your position, then I shall have no alternative but to discredit you further as a weak, pathetic debater who is not any further worth my time.
 
Back
Top Bottom