Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 24 of 24

Thread: U.S. judge says victims' bodies can prevent rape

  1. #21
    Gradualist

    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Last Seen
    09-25-17 @ 12:48 PM
    Lean
    Socialist
    Posts
    34,949
    Blog Entries
    6

    Re: U.S. judge says victims' bodies can prevent rape

    **** people are stupid


  2. #22
    Guru
    Aderleth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Last Seen
    04-08-16 @ 06:26 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    4,294

    Re: U.S. judge says victims' bodies can prevent rape

    Quote Originally Posted by specklebang View Post
    Here we go again. We are governed by idiots. Just imagine getting this ding-bat as your Judge.

    U.S. judge says victims' bodies can prevent rape


    As the article points out (or references, at least), this judge's views are not merely outdated, they're explicitly rejected as a matter of law in California, and have been for at least 30 years.

  3. #23
    Discount Philosopher
    specklebang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Last Seen
    06-05-14 @ 08:26 PM
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    11,524

    Re: U.S. judge says victims' bodies can prevent rape

    I realize that this is not applicable. My concern is the mentality behind the statement. A Judge should NOT be a fool with other people's lives in his hands.


    Quote Originally Posted by Aderleth View Post
    As the article points out (or references, at least), this judge's views are not merely outdated, they're explicitly rejected as a matter of law in California, and have been for at least 30 years.

  4. #24
    Guru
    Aderleth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Last Seen
    04-08-16 @ 06:26 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    4,294

    Re: U.S. judge says victims' bodies can prevent rape

    Quote Originally Posted by specklebang View Post
    I realize that this is not applicable. My concern is the mentality behind the statement. A Judge should NOT be a fool with other people's lives in his hands.
    I agree. I was coming from the perspective of "not only is this an awful, and wildly innacurate sentiment, but the judge - by bringing it up in court - is actually rejecting the legal framework he's bound to enforce."

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •