• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

DOJ Documents Show Huge Increase in Warrantless Electronic Surveillance

mpg

DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 22, 2005
Messages
7,795
Reaction score
1,784
Location
Milford, CT
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
Obama the surveillance and drone king.

Who is so thanks to the efforts of George W. Bush being the surveillance and drone king before him.
 
Who is so thanks to the efforts of George W. Bush being the surveillance and drone king before him.

But Obama could have nixed it or curtailed it and he just expanded it.
FYI: I detested Bushy.
 
But Obama could have nixed it or curtailed it and he just expanded it.
FYI: I detested Bushy.

And the GOP could have put forward a presidential candidate that would put an end to it.
 
Civil liberties being trampled upon. Typical USA ****.
 
"Justice Department documents released today by the ACLU reveal that federal law enforcement agencies are increasingly monitoring Americans’ electronic communications, and doing so without warrants, sufficient oversight, or meaningful accountability."

I didn't read all the documents associated with this statement but would suggest that the without sufficient oversight, or meaningful accountability." is a very subjective opinion.

What would be required to fairly oversee these searches, is an unbiased neutral group.

Personally, if they want to monitor all my communications, (including the ones in this forum:lol:), they can knock themselves out.

Since it's not possible to find an agency or group that is neutral, I guess the courts will have to do it. But, are the courts neutral?
 
Back
Top Bottom