• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

State to Eliminate “Bride” & “Groom” on Marriage Certificates [W:303]

re: State to Eliminate “Bride” & “Groom” on Marriage Certificates [W:303]

Redress said:
Yes, I do understand why you posted it and what it means. It just was one of those moments where something clicked for me and so I posted it.
Click to expand...

I know, I'm just saying that it's not really a literal list of things to watch out for, the general sentiment is far more important.
 
re: State to Eliminate “Bride” & “Groom” on Marriage Certificates [W:303]

Objective-J said:
yes latter on after your statement you tried to reword it to save face but you failed :shrug:
I was factually right and you trying to back pedal now doesnt change anything lol

I even quoted you for proof, wheres your proof you say you ment on the form? lol thats right you have done because thats not what you said, you were crying about "options" and you were 100% wrong

the form is MEANINGLESS to your statement as YOU wrote it :) whether its on the form or not you still have the OPTION, PERIOD :D


nice try but you fail, please stop because you are only getting more egg on your face,
LMAO

all you had to do is man up and say you mispoke you meant ON THE FORM, which you didnt say :shrug:
Click to expand...

Dude. We're talking about the form. Read the OP. Nothing else is being discussed.

Then go see a doctor. Your manic laughing when your wrong makes you look mentally ill.
 
re: State to Eliminate “Bride” & “Groom” on Marriage Certificates [W:303]

Your Star said:
All I know is that I'm going to be a wife, and have a wife, and that I'm not insecure enough to need a government form tell me that for me.
Click to expand...

exactly and thats AWESOME for you, we're not there yet in PA but my best friend hopes to be a wife and have a wife soon, they may even make a trip to get it donw somewhere else just because :D
 
re: State to Eliminate “Bride” & “Groom” on Marriage Certificates [W:303]

Your Star said:
All I know is that I'm going to be a wife, and have a wife, and that I'm not insecure enough to need a government form tell me that for me.
Click to expand...

That is the beautiful thing though: this change only affects what a person is called on some unimportant government form. You will still be a wife and make some one very happy. This will not change that.
 
re: State to Eliminate “Bride” & “Groom” on Marriage Certificates [W:303]

Paul Austin said:
Dude. We're talking about the form. Read the OP. Nothing else is being discussed.

Then go see a doctor. Your manic laughing when your wrong makes you look mentally ill.
Click to expand...

really, nothing else, hell people in this thread were talking about having sex and trying to marry children that doesnt soudn like the form

if you meant form simply say thats what you meant, it is however not what you said AT ALL. Im not sure why that fact bothers you, not my fault you were wrong and your failed insults prove you have not logical, rational or honest course to take LMAO

i was 100% right and still am, this fact will not change simply because its what YOU wrote. :)
 
re: State to Eliminate “Bride” & “Groom” on Marriage Certificates [W:303]

So much angst over a semantical nothing. This thread makes baby Jesus cry. :(
 
re: State to Eliminate “Bride” & “Groom” on Marriage Certificates [W:303]

Will anyone who is upset about this respond to the issue of what gay people who are now legally allowed to wed in that state are supposed to do if this form isn't changed at all? Is a man supposed to put his name in the bride space? A woman as groom? Do you not see how that could be an issue for some people?
 
Last edited:
re: State to Eliminate “Bride” & “Groom” on Marriage Certificates [W:303]

i was 100% right and still am, this fact will not change simply because its what YOU wrote. :)
Click to expand...

Then show me the form, show me the options are still there & prove Im wrong.

If you cant I can only conclude you are mentally ill.
 
re: State to Eliminate “Bride” & “Groom” on Marriage Certificates [W:303]

lpast said:
Do you wear panties ??
Click to expand...

Gay men don't wear panties. So I ask you again: What defines a husband and wife?
 
re: State to Eliminate “Bride” & “Groom” on Marriage Certificates [W:303]

Paul Austin said:
Then show me the form, show me the options are still there & prove Im wrong.

If you cant I can only conclude you are mentally ill.
Click to expand...

oh look another failed insult LMAO

the form isnt needed this is you being dishonest and trying to deflect but the facts wont change :shurg: why cant you just man up, show some integrity and admit you misspoke LOL

heres your quote,

you said "it takes away from others"
my question was "how does it take away"
you said
Paul Austin said:
Because an option that was there before, that some people liked, will no longer be there?
Click to expand...

sorry dude, you were 100% wrong or you misspoke and dont have the ablity to admit that fact for some reason? weird this would bother you.
 
re: State to Eliminate “Bride” & “Groom” on Marriage Certificates [W:303]

Objective-J said:
oh look another failed insult LMAO

the form isnt needed this is you being dishonest and trying to deflect but the facts wont change :shurg: why cant you just man up, show some integrity and admit you misspoke LOL

heres your quote,

you said "it takes away from others"
my question was "how does it take away"
you said


sorry dude, you were 100% wrong or you misspoke and dont have the ablity to admit that fact for some reason? weird this would bother you.
Click to expand...

Dude are you seriously this ill?

In a thread about a FORM, I say changing the FORM takes something away.

Now you, laughing like a lunatic say Im wrong.

So show me the form!

You cant because Im right.

Now vanish, because youre seriously acting mentally ill.
 
re: State to Eliminate “Bride” & “Groom” on Marriage Certificates [W:303]

Bronson said:
This will be the last time I engage you in this thread. The goal of the Frankfurt School of Fabian Socialists/Collectivists/Marxists is quite clear and well documented. Whether you choose to believe the data or not is not my problem. Hell maybe you agree with it. Wouldn't surprise me.

The Naked Communist - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Click to expand...

Scary how many of these goals have already been achieved.
 
re: State to Eliminate “Bride” & “Groom” on Marriage Certificates [W:303]

Your Star said:
More heterosexual people have anal sex than LGBT people, what of them?

Seriously dude, your so wrong it's embarrassing.
Click to expand...

OK Star I have to call your bluff on that, some verifiable stats please. Lay your cards on the table mam.
 
re: State to Eliminate “Bride” & “Groom” on Marriage Certificates [W:303]

What, exactly, is that The Naked Communist link supposed to prove? Are we really descending to the level of Hitler loved dogs?
 
re: State to Eliminate “Bride” & “Groom” on Marriage Certificates [W:303]

Paul Austin said:
I have to admit that things like this sadden me. Its not that I object to "progress", its just that there is no need for something like this.

The "old" terms could still have been accomodated, this sort of thing is just inflamatory really.
Click to expand...

Tearing down the societal traditions is the number one objective of Liberals.

"gay marriage" isn't as much about allowing gays to get married; it's about destroying the societal norms so the Libbos can come in and rebuild their utopian society.
 
re: State to Eliminate “Bride” & “Groom” on Marriage Certificates [W:303]

RepublicanMcDuc said:
Your Star is correct.

Anal Sex More Popular Than Possibly Expected Among Heterosexual Couples: Center for Disease Control and Prevention Report
Click to expand...

The percent of straight couples that have tried anal sex once is surprising but it is ONCE not regular anal sex. It is mostly young people experimenting trying everything at least ONCE. I myself never had the urge for that experiment, yuck. Your Star is not correct at all.
 
re: State to Eliminate “Bride” & “Groom” on Marriage Certificates [W:303]

i have 14 quote responses...that im not going to answer...Im not singling out anyone to ignore..im ignoring all of them because im through with this thread...there is no debating this subject because its a cut and dried im for your against issue...and ive stated my position clearly
 
re: State to Eliminate “Bride” & “Groom” on Marriage Certificates [W:303]

sawyerloggingon said:
The percent of straight couples that have tried anal sex once is surprising but it is ONCE not regular anal sex. It is mostly young people experimenting trying everything at least ONCE. I myself never had the urge for that experiment, yuck.
Click to expand...



"Studies indicate that about 25 percent of heterosexual couples have had anal sex at least once, and 10 percent regularly have anal penetration."[4]

Anal sex - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You do the math.


Using stats for the number of gay men, couples, etc. in the U.S., even if every gay male couple had anal sex regularly (hint: not true), the total number of straights having it regularly would still outnumber the total number of gays doing it.

Of course, this is all a consequence of there being so many more straight people than gay people, but Your Star's point was valid the way it was worded.

The main point to all of this is that lots of people are having anal sex, not just the "icky" gays.
 
Last edited:
re: State to Eliminate “Bride” & “Groom” on Marriage Certificates [W:303]

Paul Austin said:
Then show me the form, show me the options are still there & prove Im wrong.

If you cant I can only conclude you are mentally ill.
Click to expand...

Actually it is kinda on you to prove your claim.
 
re: State to Eliminate “Bride” & “Groom” on Marriage Certificates [W:303]

Mathematician said:
I'm about to go off on the gays if this doesn't stop. The gays can call each other whatever in the heck they want. I'll even provide the white out for their certificate. However, they're in for a fight if they expect me and other normal couples to drop the use of husband and wife.
Click to expand...
Nobody's expecting much of anything from you on a personal level. It's simply a change in the wording of a legal document that can now be issued to groupings outside of the "traditional" sort.
 
re: State to Eliminate “Bride” & “Groom” on Marriage Certificates [W:303]

sawyerloggingon said:
This is the kind of stuff that predicated the fall of the Roman empire. Watch for the legalization of having sex with children next.
Click to expand...
Sounds like a student of the David Barton revisionism doctrine.
 
re: State to Eliminate “Bride” & “Groom” on Marriage Certificates [W:303]

Redress said:
Actually it is kinda on you to prove your claim.
Click to expand...

Its kind of in the OP?

You know, what we're talking about?
 
re: State to Eliminate “Bride” & “Groom” on Marriage Certificates [W:303]

Paul Austin said:
Its kind of in the OP?

You know, what we're talking about?
Click to expand...

You said nothing else is being discussed. That is clear cut wrong. But I at least gave you the chance to prove yourself right. Go for it. Prove yourself right.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom