• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

State to Eliminate “Bride” & “Groom” on Marriage Certificates [W:303]

re: State to Eliminate “Bride” & “Groom” on Marriage Certificates [W:303]

You're right, some might be bi-sexual. However, regardless of whether they are homosexual or bi-sexual, they probably found out by watching two of the same sex ****ing. Not my cup of tea for a job, but hey I'm sure it payed their bills.

Male dogs hump each other too, are they all gay? According to the current accepted rhetoric in gay circles, every species that acts gay, IS gay, or bi sexual. Why? And how do they know this? Wait, now hold on a second.. I just thought of something, certain standing members here at DP insist that behavior is not indicative of sexuality, or not always indicative of sexuality. In fact they are clear that sexual behavior has nothing to do with sexuality, that the two are not the same. So how can this be true, and yet the aformentioned series of books outlining the 1500 gay species also be true? At least humans can talk, so we can put all the blocks in place, but last time I checked, no one has figured out a way to talk to the little critters, have they?

Accordingly, even if the statement were refined to suggest that homosexual behavior has been observed in 1500 species and that there is a good reason to believe that these species were homosexual, wouldn't homosexual behavior be something we would expect to see in every species that has both male and female gender? Why some and not others?


Tim-
 
re: State to Eliminate “Bride” & “Groom” on Marriage Certificates [W:303]

The OP was about making straight people stop being called bride and groom, that is dissing them.

No, it's about a stupid form.

And they say gay guys are drama queens :lol:
 
re: State to Eliminate “Bride” & “Groom” on Marriage Certificates [W:303]

To those who find this offensive, you do realize that keeping the forms just as they are is insulting to gay people, right? Contrary to popular belief, two guys who tie the knot usually both refer to themselves as husband or groom. One of them does not automatically become the wife.

The best, least offensive solution is to keep the same terminology, but allow people to select which one applies to them.
 
re: State to Eliminate “Bride” & “Groom” on Marriage Certificates [W:303]

Focus on this! How could anyone ever turn away from this to be with another man?!!! What a babe!

Stare at this long enough and all thoughts of homosexuality will go away.



DPDebate.jpg
 
re: State to Eliminate “Bride” & “Groom” on Marriage Certificates [W:303]

Hmm, yeah but how does he know that all those 1500 species are homosexual?


Tim-

It shows acts of homosexuality are natural. They may not be monogamously homosexual, nonetheless, they are homosexual.
 
re: State to Eliminate “Bride” & “Groom” on Marriage Certificates [W:303]

Focus on this! How could anyone ever turn away from this to be with another man?!!! What a babe!

Stare at this long enough and all thoughts of homosexuality will go away.

This is example of close-mindedness really scares me about the voting, general public.
 
re: State to Eliminate “Bride” & “Groom” on Marriage Certificates [W:303]

Focus on this! How could anyone ever turn away from this to be with another man?!!! What a babe!

Stare at this long enough and all thoughts of homosexuality will go away.

I could do nothing but sit and stare at that 24/7, and I would end up dying of old age before I ever became physically attracted to her.
 
re: State to Eliminate “Bride” & “Groom” on Marriage Certificates [W:303]

Focus on this! How could anyone ever turn away from this to be with another man?!!! What a babe!

Stare at this long enough and all thoughts of homosexuality will go away.



View attachment 67138701

She's not that attractive. :shrug:
 
re: State to Eliminate “Bride” & “Groom” on Marriage Certificates [W:303]

She's not that attractive. :shrug:

She's hotter than you, but that's my opinion, you're not bad yourself. :)


Tim-
 
re: State to Eliminate “Bride” & “Groom” on Marriage Certificates [W:303]

State to Eliminate


I wonder if the spokesman for the health department with be changing his name.


It's a good idea. Takes away the religious right's ability to taunt homosexuals.
 
re: State to Eliminate “Bride” & “Groom” on Marriage Certificates [W:303]

Maybe they could figure out a way to work in pitcher/catcher into the vow.
 
re: State to Eliminate “Bride” & “Groom” on Marriage Certificates [W:303]

It shows acts of homosexuality are natural. They may not be monogamously homosexual, nonetheless, they are homosexual.

Sorry man but the butt is exit only
 
re: State to Eliminate “Bride” & “Groom” on Marriage Certificates [W:303]

Sorry man but the butt is exit only

Obviously not. It's an entrance for many. Don't believe me? Look up "anal sex." The doctor checks your prostate through it, as well. It's not just an exit.
 
re: State to Eliminate “Bride” & “Groom” on Marriage Certificates [W:303]

Obviously not. It's an entrance for many. Don't believe me? Look up "anal sex." The doctor checks your prostate through it, as well. It's not just an exit.

It's purpose is defecation. The expulsion of fecal matter.

If mentally ill people choose to put their sexual organs or other objects in there, that doesn't make it "normal"

What if Homosexuality is a mental disorder like OCD, BPD, NPD, ect.? It's certainly a possibility.
 
re: State to Eliminate “Bride” & “Groom” on Marriage Certificates [W:303]

If mentally ill people choose to put their sexual organs or other objects in there, that doesn't make it "normal"?

Define 'normal' for me.

What if Homosexuality is a mental disorder like OCD, BPD, NPD, ect.? It's certainly a possibility.

It was considered d for some time. Eventually, however, researchers discovred that it did not actually fit the definition of a mental disorder, so it was removed.
 
re: State to Eliminate “Bride” & “Groom” on Marriage Certificates [W:303]

The OP was about making straight people stop being called bride and groom, that is dissing them.

You dont have to stop calling a bride a bride or a groom a groom. That isnt what this is about at all.
 
re: State to Eliminate “Bride” & “Groom” on Marriage Certificates [W:303]

It's purpose is defecation. The expulsion of fecal matter.

If mentally ill people choose to put their sexual organs or other objects in there, that doesn't make it "normal"

Oh boy, does that mean any man who has received a rectal examination is mentally ill? Do you have any evidence that being homosexual is the same as being mentally ill? The purpose of the vagina is also used to expel babies and urine. What's your point? A nation of celibate losers? No fun in that.
 
re: State to Eliminate “Bride” & “Groom” on Marriage Certificates [W:303]

It's purpose is defecation. The expulsion of fecal matter.

If mentally ill people choose to put their sexual organs or other objects in there, that doesn't make it "normal"

What if Homosexuality is a mental disorder like OCD, BPD, NPD, ect.? It's certainly a possibility.

LGBT people are not mentally ill and its absolutely terrible that you would call them that.

And homosexuality used to be considered a mental disorder a while ago and then new research came out that suggested that it wasnt a mental disorder so no it isnt a possibility at all.
 
re: State to Eliminate “Bride” & “Groom” on Marriage Certificates [W:303]

Define 'normal' for me.

Why should I have to define normal for you? Don't you know?

What % of the population engages in man inserting sexual organ into another man's buttocks compared to the % of the population that engages in the "normal" sexual activity between a male and female? You seem to be approaching this from the position that I'm discussing anal sex in terms of pleasure. You are mistaken. The primary function of sex is to propagate the species. Can you show me where a baby has ever been conceived when a man has put his sexual organ into a anus? Appreciate it.

It was considered d for some time. Eventually, however, researchers discovred that it did not actually fit the definition of a mental disorder, so it was removed.

And they wouldn't have come to that conclusion because of political reasons? The "normalization" of Homosexuality is just another Cultural Marxist tactic to break down the traditional family.
 
re: State to Eliminate “Bride” & “Groom” on Marriage Certificates [W:303]

LGBT people are not mentally ill and its absolutely terrible that you would call them that.

Read my post again. I haven't called anyone anything. I simply stated that it is a possibility.

And homosexuality used to be considered a mental disorder a while ago and then new research came out that suggested that it wasnt a mental disorder so no it isnt a possibility at all.

And all I'm saying is that in this new age of PC Liberalism where everything is political, I wouldn't be surprised if that decision was made for political reasons

The removal of Homosexuality from the DSM-II criteria was not because of a "scientific breakthrough" previously undiscovered.
 
re: State to Eliminate “Bride” & “Groom” on Marriage Certificates [W:303]

And they wouldn't have come to that conclusion because of political reasons? The "normalization" of Homosexuality is just another Cultural Marxist tactic to break down the traditional family.

I'll make a thread in the 'Conspiracy Theories' subforum later for this.
 
re: State to Eliminate “Bride” & “Groom” on Marriage Certificates [W:303]

What % of the population engages in man inserting sexual organ into another man's buttocks compared to the % of the population that engages in the "normal" sexual activity between a male and female?

So your saying normality is defined by what the majority does/is?

And they wouldn't have come to that conclusion because of political reasons?


Conspiracy forum is over there. ------>


The "normalization" of Homosexuality is just another Cultural Marxist tactic to break down the traditional family.

OH yeah, I forgot about that part of the Communist Manifesto where is said the homosexuality is the pinnacle of workers rights. Silly me.


Guess what buddy.

Queers have families too. They're all right.
 
re: State to Eliminate “Bride” & “Groom” on Marriage Certificates [W:303]

I'll make a thread in the 'Conspiracy Theories' subforum later for this.

Dodge noted
 
re: State to Eliminate “Bride” & “Groom” on Marriage Certificates [W:303]

Dodge noted

Considering that wasn't even a reply to me, I didn't dodge anything. Your falsehood is noted, though.

Here is my response: Click here, Bronson
 
Back
Top Bottom