Not so much. Of course this is more and more true in straight marriages as well. Susy, barefoot, pregnant and in the kitchen with Joe out earning the money is an outdated paradigm. One of my favorite couples the woman will be out working on the car while the husband is in watching the kids.In terminology, no. In how roles shake out, it's surprising how, more often than not, even in gay couples, traditional stereotypical gender roles still unfold as they do with heterosexual couples. There still usually ends up being a "husband" and a "wife".
BTW, was Richard Nixon a Communist?
After all, he's the President who extended diplomatic recognition of the Communist government of China.7. Grant recognition of Red China. Admission of Red China to the U.N.
Um no you did not. You tried to but were refuted by someone who actually agrees with you. A child cannot be conceived by 2 men through anal sex. A woman cannot get pregnant through anal sex. This is basic science. And you're accusing me of stating silly things?I refuted this: it's also an entrance. It's not just about pleasure. Sex is also a way to show the feeling of love. Homosexuals can feel love, just as heterosexual couples do.
There is evidence. It's called the DSM criteria. It was removed for most likely political reasons. Not scientific. There also was not a 100% universal opinion by psychologists at the time to remove it. Only 55%. I understand in 2012 you've been programmed to believe differently by Culture, Academia, Hollywood, and whatever cool and hip trendy show is playing on the alphabet networks. Doesn't mean you are correct however.... because you need evidence that there is a mental disorder there. There was none. The idea that it was a mental order was not accepted by those practitioners and they overturned it. The belief homosexuality is a mental disorder is archaic.
The DSM criteria is what labeled Homosexuality a mental disorder before it was changed for most likely political reasons. I merely stated it was definitely a possibility that homosexuality is a mental disorder, even though it was removed from the DSM criteria for probably political reasons. Your assumption, and the assumption of everyone on the left who engages in their 2012 Culture Group think, is that every scientific decision that was made pre far left Collectivism/Cultural Marxism was motivated by hatred or bigotry. What if you were lied to?You can question them. You are not questioning them. You, a heterosexual man, are telling them they have a mental disorder. There's a difference.
Besides, if Homosexuals could claim they were "disabled" for being gay they could receive some additional stimulus from Obama's stash. They would probably qualify for multiple social and welfare programs where they can get hand outs courtesy of Obama's borrowed/taxed/printed money. Why would you want to deprive them of potentially life saving benefits?
Calling people stupid isn't an argument. Like I said before feel free to do that if it makes you feel better.Nope. I only call those people stupid who appear as such. I don't base anything off emotional arguments. You, however, seem to be.
Of course you are because intellectually you are weakI'm not leaning on anyone.