But it IS. You are persistently arguing in favor of SPECIAL privileges to use a public space, rather than equal rights to a public space.
The atheists in question aren't acting entitled at all. Their actions contested another group which IS acting entitled (and your position is, in effect, supporting that false sense of entitlement).
The only major obvious problem with that being that they didn't ruin anything at all.
Get this through your head. In actual FACT, the atheists didn't vandalize, destroy, or remove any part of anyone else's display.
Is this getting through? Anyone home?
If, by YOUR reasoning, the mere presence of a contrary viewpoint somehow "ruins" a display...then we can just as easily say that the nativity display "ruins" the atheist display by its mere presence.
If you don't see that implication, then that indicates that you are continuing to treat the nativity scene (despite your protestation) as being entitled to special protections or insulation from contrary views.
NO ONE RUINED THE NATIVITY DISPLAY. You keep posting as if something was done to the display. That simply didn't happen. The nativity display was completely unharmed. Later, it was removed along with ALL the displays in response to vandalism against the display of the atheists.
NOTHING WAS TAKEN. Again, your posts are becoming more hysterical despite clear access to information which disproves your claims.
The Facts:
Multiple displays by atheists were vandalized.
The nativity display was unharmed.
The displays -- all of them -- were removed by order of the city government in response to vandalism against the atheist displays.
Your Position:
It was a "dick move" on the part of the atheists to "ruin" the Nativity display.
Problem:
The atheists *didn't do anything at all to the nativity display*.
Do you see the disconnect here?