- Joined
- Jul 23, 2009
- Messages
- 3,357
- Reaction score
- 986
- Location
- Alabama
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
Wtf. It isn't conservatives they need to be focusing on, when it comes to intimidation tactics and dead voters. As for the UN, it doesn't amount to much more than tin horn dictators and Israel-haters these days, so what does that say?
Yes, conservatives don't pursue intimidation tactics at voting polls.
Rather, they just try to change the laws to suppress the voting opportunities of liberal voters.
Like require them to show ID, the same ones they use at the liquor store every week; the same one they use to buy a gun; the same one they use at the bank.
Yes, conservatives don't pursue intimidation tactics at voting polls.
Rather, they just try to change the laws to suppress the voting opportunities of liberal voters.
where was the UN when Al Gore was shafted by the Supreme criminal court and allowed moronic Bush to walk into the Oval office?
It was not asked to be there. It was in 2004, 2008 and seems now as well.
Really?It was not asked to be there. It was in 2004, 2008 and seems now as well.
The USA was a primary player in setting up the UN post WW2 and had a hand in every UN charter and treaty structure.The UN should not EVER be involved in ANY US Political Activity. The entire organization has no legitimate power ANYWHERE on ANY topic inside the United States of America. In fact, we should not even be a member of the organization and it should not be allowed to base itself in this country either.
Really?
So why would the worlds number one fascist, oops sorry democratic state require monitoring of elections and vote counting by the UN after 2004?
First off... you aint the worlds number one democratic state. India is.
Secondly... well there was a few problems in the 2000 election.. and the 2004 election.. so... why dont you ask the Bush administration that asked them to come?
The USA was a primary player in setting up the UN post WW2 and had a hand in every UN charter and treaty structure.
Which UN charter and rights conventions etc do you disapprove of?
Since the 1960s the US had been the number 1 vetoing member on the security council?
What the USA should do is officially get the hell out of the UN.
Pretty much every single one of them, if they apply to and thereby limit US Sovereignty.
.
UN charters dont impede a nation's soveriegnty. In fact they deal with conflict resolutions BETWEEN nations, and also basic human rights conventions.
What you are referring to is the self given right for the USA to invade who it likes, when it likes on behalf of its fascist corporate master tyrrants, and kill how ever many civilians it likes, thieve its resources etc, and get away with it - I believe they call it expansionist imperial fascism.
I am sure you would retract your statement or at the very least re-word it, so that you dont lose total credibility in here after being utterly slaughtered in public
(the reason I suggested the USA should get the hell out of the UN is that the USA is a fascist totalitarian super rogue state that fights against the spread of democracy and freedom in the world - the record is there for everybody to see, 37 un-provoked military attacks against predominantly defenseless nations, that has resulted in over 23 million civilian deaths just since the end of WW2 alone)
No, they just want an I.D. when people vote, like it already is in Alabama.
only liberals vote early?