• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

UN to be at American Polls?

Wtf. It isn't conservatives they need to be focusing on, when it comes to intimidation tactics and dead voters. As for the UN, it doesn't amount to much more than tin horn dictators and Israel-haters these days, so what does that say?
 
Seems rather odd, being that we seemingly never dealt with the type of widespread fraud that would require such action, as opposed to places like Sudan and egypt. Not seeing the concern for voter intimidation, either
 
lizzie said:
Wtf. It isn't conservatives they need to be focusing on, when it comes to intimidation tactics and dead voters. As for the UN, it doesn't amount to much more than tin horn dictators and Israel-haters these days, so what does that say?
Click to expand...

Yes, conservatives don't pursue intimidation tactics at voting polls.

Rather, they just try to change the laws to suppress the voting opportunities of liberal voters.
 
Why the UN is allowed to even EXIST inside the borders of the United States is something I have questioned for years. They should not have ANY authority inside the United States, and should not be involved in ANY political activity in the USA.
 
samsmart said:
Yes, conservatives don't pursue intimidation tactics at voting polls.

Rather, they just try to change the laws to suppress the voting opportunities of liberal voters.
Click to expand...

Like require them to show ID, the same ones they use at the liquor store every week; the same one they use to buy a gun; the same one they use at the bank; the same one the cop asks for when they get stopped for driving while black. You know, that ID.
 
only liberals vote early?
 
samsmart said:
Yes, conservatives don't pursue intimidation tactics at voting polls.

Rather, they just try to change the laws to suppress the voting opportunities of liberal voters.
Click to expand...

No, they just want an I.D. when people vote, like it already is in Alabama.
 
Not to be seen any time in a mainstream newspaper:


U.N. backs Democrats for President

International Observers Check for Voter Fraud in Conservative Precincts.
 
Hopefully these UN gerbils understand that this will not be a pleasant experience for them.

After scrutinizing their IDs, authorizations and passports, I'll have questions for them about their prostitutes, expensive limousines and luxury hotels in the United States.

After we're done with those initial "qualifying" inquiries, we'll go into the conditions in their own 3rd world countries and why they all seem to chase white girls. Certainly it will be of legitimate concern whether they're homosexuals or not simply because of the incurable sexually transmitted diseases that the UN peacekeeping troops have been spreading around the world. We wouldn't want those sorts of carriers in our neighborhood polling places, which are often elementary schools.

It is incumbent upon every American man (liberals of course, are not included in the descriptor "man") to make sure that these maggots return home aware of how Americans feel about them and our propensity toward disrespect and the insults that we tend to carry on as long as the other party wishes to remain in the area to participate.
 
Last edited:
where was the UN when Al Gore was shafted by the Supreme criminal court and allowed moronic Bush to walk into the Oval office?
 
Klown said:
where was the UN when Al Gore was shafted by the Supreme criminal court and allowed moronic Bush to walk into the Oval office?
Click to expand...

It was not asked to be there. It was in 2004, 2008 and seems now as well.
 
PeteEU said:
It was not asked to be there. It was in 2004, 2008 and seems now as well.
Click to expand...

The UN should not EVER be involved in ANY US Political Activity. The entire organization has no legitimate power ANYWHERE on ANY topic inside the United States of America. In fact, we should not even be a member of the organization and it should not be allowed to base itself in this country either.
 
Do you believe there are bus loads of illegal voters running around?
 
PeteEU said:
It was not asked to be there. It was in 2004, 2008 and seems now as well.
Click to expand...
Really?

So why would the worlds number one fascist, oops sorry democratic state require monitoring of elections and vote counting by the UN after 2004?
 
Tigger said:
The UN should not EVER be involved in ANY US Political Activity. The entire organization has no legitimate power ANYWHERE on ANY topic inside the United States of America. In fact, we should not even be a member of the organization and it should not be allowed to base itself in this country either.
Click to expand...
The USA was a primary player in setting up the UN post WW2 and had a hand in every UN charter and treaty structure.
Which UN charter and rights conventions etc do you disapprove of?
Since the 1960s the US had been the number 1 vetoing member on the security council?
Do you know why that is the case?

What the USA should do is officially get the hell out of the UN.
 
Klown said:
Really?

So why would the worlds number one fascist, oops sorry democratic state require monitoring of elections and vote counting by the UN after 2004?
Click to expand...

First off... you aint the worlds number one democratic state. India is.

Secondly... well there was a few problems in the 2000 election.. and the 2004 election.. so... why dont you ask the Bush administration that asked them to come?
 
PeteEU said:
First off... you aint the worlds number one democratic state. India is.

Secondly... well there was a few problems in the 2000 election.. and the 2004 election.. so... why dont you ask the Bush administration that asked them to come?
Click to expand...

There are no genuine democracies in the world today. They are all various analogs of
Oligarchical tyrannies. The US is a Corpocratic fascist tyranny with imperial tentacles.

even Greece isn't a democracy and they invented the concept
 
Klown said:
The USA was a primary player in setting up the UN post WW2 and had a hand in every UN charter and treaty structure.
Click to expand...

True. That doesn't mean we should have been involved.

Klown said:
Which UN charter and rights conventions etc do you disapprove of?
Click to expand...

Pretty much every single one of them, if they apply to and thereby limit US Sovereignty.

Klown said:
Since the 1960s the US had been the number 1 vetoing member on the security council?
Click to expand...

So what?

Klown said:
What the USA should do is officially get the hell out of the UN.
Click to expand...

Exactly; and kick them out of the US entirely. Withdraw all US military support from UN operations too.
 
Tigger said:
Pretty much every single one of them, if they apply to and thereby limit US Sovereignty.



.
Click to expand...

UN charters dont impede a nation's soveriegnty. In fact they deal with conflict resolutions BETWEEN nations, and also basci human rights conventions.

What you are referring to is the self given right for the USA to invade who it likes, when it likes on behalf of its fascist corporate master tyrrants, and kill how ever many civilians it likes, thieve its resources etc, and get away with it - I believe they call it expansionist imperial fascism.

The reason the USA still LOVES the UN forum (and when I say the UN forum I mean the Security council - not the General assembly, which is far more democratic than the boys club fascist Security council) is that it can DEMAND that other nations adhere to standard UN charters and conventions (except for Israeli, of course, they receive complete US diplomatic protection for their crimes against humanity and veto pathways for their resolution violations)

I am sure you would retract your statement or at the very least re-word it, so that you dont lose total credibility in here after being utterly slaughtered in public

cheers

(the reason I suggested the USA should get the hell out of the UN is that the USA is a fascist totalitarian super rogue state that fights against the spread of democracy and freedom in the world - the record is there for everybody to see, 37 un-provoked military attacks against predominantly defenseless nations, that has resulted in over 23 million civilian deaths just since the end of WW2 alone)
 
Last edited:
Klown said:
UN charters dont impede a nation's soveriegnty. In fact they deal with conflict resolutions BETWEEN nations, and also basic human rights conventions.
Click to expand...

The only real manner of conflict resolution between nations comes at the business end of a weapon. I believe it's Napoleon who once referred to artillery as "The Final Arguement of Kings."

Klown said:
What you are referring to is the self given right for the USA to invade who it likes, when it likes on behalf of its fascist corporate master tyrrants, and kill how ever many civilians it likes, thieve its resources etc, and get away with it - I believe they call it expansionist imperial fascism.
Click to expand...

Personally I'm in favor if Isolationist Authoritarianism, which is similar to what you describe but Isolationist rather than Imperialist in nature.

Klown said:
I am sure you would retract your statement or at the very least re-word it, so that you dont lose total credibility in here after being utterly slaughtered in public
Click to expand...

Not in the least. Given the ability to do so I would deport every UN employee and every foreign diplomat on US soil TODAY.

Klown said:
(the reason I suggested the USA should get the hell out of the UN is that the USA is a fascist totalitarian super rogue state that fights against the spread of democracy and freedom in the world - the record is there for everybody to see, 37 un-provoked military attacks against predominantly defenseless nations, that has resulted in over 23 million civilian deaths just since the end of WW2 alone)
Click to expand...

Some of us have little use for Democracy and even less for Freedom.
 
DashingAmerican said:
No, they just want an I.D. when people vote, like it already is in Alabama.
Click to expand...

And to suppress voter turn out by limiting early voting only to members of the military, or limit early voting in a number of other ways.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom