- Joined
- Jun 4, 2010
- Messages
- 133,429
- Reaction score
- 43,228
- Location
- Miami
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Sounds like property tax.
Yes, but being assessed two (or three, including profit) times. First, the owner's capital is taxed, then when that capital generates profit the profit is taxed and some want again when he gives some of that profit to an association for the purpose of organization.
Should the SPLC be taxed based on member assets profit?
It's basically: "yes, we taxed the billions in owner's capital, yes we taxed the billions in owner's profit, yes we taxed all of the employees... but... we also want to tax the 178m that owners paid for association expenses."
Even if we did tax the 178m, what difference does that make after taxing billions in owner assets and profits? It's means nothing, within its own context even, and there is no real legal basis for taxing a non-profit organization's administration fees.
Should unions be taxed based on member assets and profits?
Look, people wanna tax the 178m in administration fees? Yeah, tax that 1.5% of generated revenue twice; it will not make the slightest difference in tax revenue from NFL owners and members.
Last edited: