• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The bullies win again[W710; 739]

So you cannot show me any of the evidence I asked for.

Noted.


Have a nice day.

:lol:

Did you think people just forgot about you saying you wouldn't answer my question because of [insert weirdo reason here]? It was just a few pages ago, man!

But now me laughing at you at your goofy questions ("PROVIDE THE SAME INCONTROVERTIBLE TRUTH THAT I'M UNWILLING TO SUPPLY TO PROVE ME WRONG!!!!") is somehow a problem? :lol: :lol:
 
I think Pirate is sincere in his concern about our freedom of speech, and Henrin really is struggling to understand the dynamic.

But this OldWorldOrder and Excon? They both clearly seem to want us to continue to feed our kids to marauding adults for sport, and that enthusiasm for the "right" to drive a child to suicide is nothing short of repugnant.

I won't let this bullicide stand. I'm going to my lawyer.
 
What qualifies you to decide that these actions alone would/could not cause a confused kid to kill herself?

The child tried for FOUR YEARS to escape this predator and when she could not, she died. Saying this was a "good result" is so vile, I hardly know what to call it.

Even the customers of child sex workers would find it hard to bless snuffing kids, I think.
 
So you were bullied in exactly the same way as she was and have exactly the same life experiences she had and have the exact same personality as she had?

Unless you can say 'yes' to all those things - your experiences are irrelevant in so far as qualifying yourself to answer that question.

:lol: :lol:

Until you've experienced my experiences, you can't judge my opinion on the matter.

Wow, you really need to think ahead. Somewhere, Socrates is shaking his head in shame over your horrible argumentation.

Have a good [however long it is, til you post again with an extremely bad point]!
 
The child tried for FOUR YEARS to escape this predator and when she could not, she died. Saying this was a "good result" is so vile, I hardly know what to call it.

Even the customers of child sex workers would find it hard to bless snuffing kids, I think.

Well, when she couldn't she killed herself. Let's be honest. She wasn't killed by him, you bull****icider.
 
Part of free speach is having to deal with evil speach with evil intent toward our children.

Children are very much a "protected" group when it comes to our laws, as they should be.

Actions which apply to children are not necessarily the same when applied to adults.
 
:lol:

Did you think people just forgot about you saying you wouldn't answer my question because of [insert weirdo reason here]? It was just a few pages ago, man!

But now me laughing at you at your goofy questions ("PROVIDE THE SAME INCONTROVERTIBLE TRUTH THAT I'M UNWILLING TO SUPPLY TO PROVE ME WRONG!!!!") is somehow a problem? :lol: :lol:

Goofy or not - you seem unable to answer them.

So, despite the fact you think I am psychopathic - you still are unable to answer my questions.

Makes me wonder how simplistic the questions have to be before you can answer them.


And my choice to not take your previous question seriously was not an absolute on all your future questions. Just that particular one.
Though as long as I feel that way about you, it will alter the amount of effort I will probably feel like putting out n answering your questions.


Have a nice day.
 
I like the "You were (supposedly) bullied" line. Who decided what bullying is in this case? Pinkie?

There's a contingent of posters that are just upset this girl killed herself and are lashing out randomly. No real solutions.
 
a) sorry you were (supposedly) bullied.

b) So you were bullied in exactly the same way as she was and have exactly the same life experiences she had and have the exact same personality as she had?

Unless you can say 'yes' to all those things - your experiences are irrelevant in so far as qualifying yourself to answer that question.

Being bullied IRL by another child is a universe away from being bullied over the internet by a predatory adult.

No one old enough to be up at midnight, posting to DP, has ever experienced anything like what this child did -- it's just not possible.
 
Last edited:
Well, when she couldn't she killed herself. Let's be honest. She wasn't killed by him, you bull****icider.

Charles Manson didn't kill anyone either. If your only point is that the person who committed the bullying didn't actually kill someone, it's not a strong one.
 
Having not killed myself via bullying.

You're one person on a planet of nearly 7 billion.....your personal experiences are meaningless as far as qualification goes.

The over 4,000 kids who kill themselves each year (over half of which are attributed to bullying) if they could speak, may be a bit more "qualified" than you on this topic. Perhaps it's time for more adults to "man up" and start speaking for them instead of blaming them. :shrug:
 
Goofy or not - you seem unable to answer them.

So, despite the fact you think I am psychopathic - you still are unable to answer my questions.

Makes me wonder how simplistic the questions have to be before you can answer them.


And my choice to not take your previous question seriously was not an absolute on all your future questions. Just that particular one.
Though as long as I feel that way about you, it will alter the amount of effort I will probably feel like putting out n answering your questions.


Have a nice day.

So you expect me to think I need to answer you questions when you don't answer mine? That's...psychopathic, bro.
 
Moderator's Warning:
Personal attacks stop now. Stick to the topic.
 
Charles Manson didn't kill anyone either. If your only point is that the person who committed the bullying didn't actually kill someone, it's not a strong one.

Uhhh...it's a very strong one when you consider that Charles Manson didn't go to jail for murder. Or bullicide.
 
You're one person on a planet of nearly 7 billion.....your personal experiences are meaningless as far as qualification goes.

The over 4,000 kids who kill themselves each year (over half of which are attributed to bullying) if they could speak, may be a bit more "qualified" than you on this topic. Perhaps it's time for more adults to "man up" and start speaking for them instead of blaming them. :shrug:

Really? Because DA60 thought my personal qualifications were very important. You may want to talk to him.
 
Really? Because DA60 thought my personal qualifications were very important. You may want to talk to him.

My mistake.

Let me re-phrase.

'b) So you were bullied in exactly the same way as she was and have exactly the same life experiences she had and have the exact same personality as she had?

Unless you can say 'yes' to all those things - your experiences are irrelevant in so far as qualifying yourself to make the statement that you did.


Have a nice day.
 
Really? Because DA60 thought my personal qualifications were very important. You may want to talk to him.

Why are you bringing another poster's comments into your "discussion" with me. Can't your arguments stand on their own merit?
 
So you expect me to think I need to answer you questions when you don't answer mine?
Fair enough.

Okay, ask me a question and I will answer it honestly.

And when I do, I ask you to answer the following question:


what if a father (who is a cop) rapes his 8 year old child every day for 4 years. Finally, the child takes her own life because she cannot see any other way to stop him from raping her.

Now is he morally responsible at all for her suicide?

Yes or no?
 
My mistake.

Let me re-phrase.

'b) So you were bullied in exactly the same way as she was and have exactly the same life experiences she had and have the exact same personality as she had?

Unless you can say 'yes' to all those things - your experiences are irrelevant in so far as qualifying yourself to make the statement that you did.


Have a nice day.

Unless you've had the same experiences that I've had, exactly in the same way, you experiences are irrelevant to assessing my statements.

See? It's easy and fun to run circles around poor argumentation.

The same logic goes for defining bullying in general in a way that's not subjective.
 
Why are you bringing another poster's comments into your "discussion" with me. Can't your arguments stand on their own merit?

Probably because you responded to my comments to another poster? Not rocket surgery, my man.
 
Unless you've had the same experiences that I've had, exactly in the same way, you experiences are irrelevant to assessing my statements.

See? It's easy and fun to run circles around poor argumentation.

The same logic goes for defining bullying in general in a way that's not subjective.

So, you will not answer my question even though I am saying I will honestly answer ANY question you pose to me?

Noted.


Have a nice day.
 
Uhhh...yeah. You should probably refresh the thread before you post.
 
Back
Top Bottom