Why are you against ambassadors being able to send classified documents up their chain (especially regarding speculation)?
Do you think we should not have ambassadors? Or just that they should not be able to communicate securely with their higher-ups.
But then again they also said there were WMDs in Iraq and that Saddam was linked with al qaeda and 9/11
I prefer the analysis carried out by the same two expert analysts who determined the number of deaths Milosovic was responsible for. You know, the analysis that the US accepted and was used as key evidence in finding Milosovic guitly at the Hague.
Funny how when the same two analysts are sent to Iraq to carry out an identical assessment, with an even larger sample size, the US questions the accuracy of the report. Funny that isnt it!
Lets assume the US defence department is correct with an estimate of about 100,000 dead Iraqi civilains. Sounds like a crime against humanity to me? And remember, Saddam was tried and hung for the death of about 140 prisoners.
This has to do with exposing war crimes and atrocoties - purely a moral and legal matter. Not a time to politically pollute the issue with your paranoic left right tribalism
"If I take death into my life, acknowledge it, and face it squarely, I will free myself from the anxiety of death and the pettiness of life - and only then will I be free to become myself." ~ Martin Heidegger