• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Single Most Accurate Indicator of Labor Market Health

Harshaw

Filmmaker ● Lawyer ● Patriot
DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 1, 2005
Messages
38,750
Reaction score
13,845
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Right
The subject line is the headline; I would have used "A Stark Graphic Showing Why This Anemic Job Growth Isn't Near Enough."

From the Mercatus Center at George Mason U:

Employment-Ratio-580.png


The Single Most Accurate Indicator of Labor Market Health | Mercatus

So, what kind of labor market recovery have we seen over the past three years? As the graph shows, the answer is simple: NONE. Job growth hasn’t been strong enough to support our growing population. The employment-to-population ratio was 59.4% three years ago. It hit a 25-year low of 58.5% in October of 2009, and yet it remains at just 58.6% today.


To know what kind of job growth we need for economic recovery, we must first realize that the United States is still a growing nation. Each month, the working-age population grows by an estimated 180,000 people. Simply to support this growing population, we need to add at least 130,000 new jobs. With anything less, we fall further behind. No matter what the other economic data indicates, a true labor market recovery requires job growth strong enough to consistently raise the employment-to-population ratio. This would mean adding at least 250,000 new jobs per month, every month, for years.
 
I would suggest using labor force participation rate as a better indicator. As it accounts for specific demographics that would present an inaccurate interpretation of the employement status
 
I don't believe we have anywhere near enough jobs and that the participation rate will vary with job availability more than any other factor. The Great and Inimitable GWShiiteForBrains created problems that may require a generation to solve, repair, find, and generate a new economic paradigm. I personally believe that a forced response to imminent catastrophe caused by Global Warming is our best hope for the future. It creates renewable energy workforces as the only viable solution. Too bad this couldn't happen with legislative good judgement and common sense. It is also the reason that corporations that paid to have Anti Global Warming papers written should be prosecuted. Keerist, so should the initiators of torture. That needs be at the highest level.
 
Back
Top Bottom