• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

New Black Panthers: Where is the DOJ?

It is funny that the right is so focused on this relatively small new group, but does not have the same problem with KKK, white pride and worst wackos that are on the right and even in the GOP it self. Hypocrites.
 
I oppose BOTH. Why don't you? It's wrong either way, not just one way. You are condoning the practice of the BBPP simply because the Bush administration made the same mistake? That's kind of dumb. The difference is, I oppose BOTH, and you don't. Why?


In one instance complaints made by local voters were filed, in the other case no complaints by local voters were filed - No difference?

Any rational person would conclude that in one case there was actual intimidation and in the other instance, the locals thought the NBPP clowns were nothing more than jokes.
 
It is funny that the right is so focused on this relatively small new group, but does not have the same problem with KKK, white pride and worst wackos that are on the right and even in the GOP it self. Hypocrites.

WOW, with so many examples given, where do I begin? ;-)
 
Last edited:
In one instance complaints made by local voters were filed, in the other case no complaints by local voters were filed - No difference?

Any rational person would conclude that in one case there was actual intimidation and in the other instance, the locals thought the NBPP clowns were nothing more than jokes.

LOL. Which indicates more voter intimidation, the voter that comes forward and publically complains or the one that is afraid to do so?
 
It is funny that the right is so focused on this relatively small new group, but does not have the same problem with KKK, white pride and worst wackos that are on the right and even in the GOP it self. Hypocrites.

Wrong again. If the KKK is out there talking like this, they should be investigated. Oh wait. THEY ARE ALL THE TIME. If the KKK is inciting violence against blacks across the nation, the DOJ SHOULD step in and do something.

Once again, I'm not allowing for one, and disallowing for the other. THAT IS WHAT THE LIBERALS DO! It's what YOU just did.
 
In one instance complaints made by local voters were filed, in the other case no complaints by local voters were filed - No difference?

Any rational person would conclude that in one case there was actual intimidation and in the other instance, the locals thought the NBPP clowns were nothing more than jokes.

Sooooo, if I beat the crap out of my wife, but she doesn't file an official complaint, I suppose it's ok to beat the crap out of her......

Your logic is pathetic
 
WOW, with so many examples given where do I begin? ;-)

Remember the "obama report" "Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment" back in 2009 and the reaction to it?

(Daryl) Johnson’s career took an unexpected turn in 2009, when an analysis he wrote on the rise of “Right-Wing Extremism” (.pdf) sparked a political controversy. Under pressure from conservatives, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) repudiated Johnson’s paper — an especially bitter pill for him to swallow now that Wade Michael Page, a suspected white supremacist, killed at least six people at a Sikh temple in Oak Creek, Wisconsin. For Johnson, the shooting was a reminder that the government’s counterterrorism efforts are almost exclusively focused on al-Qaida, even as non-Islamist groups threaten Americans domestically.

Though the FBI said following the shooting that no one had any idea the man was dangerous, the Southern Poverty Law Center stated that it had been tracking the man for at least 10 years.
 
Last edited:
Sooooo, if I beat the crap out of my wife, but she doesn't file an official complaint, I suppose it's ok to beat the crap out of her......

Your logic is pathetic

Your "logic" is even more so but fails to address the question. The longer videos showing the polling place with the NBPP clowns show how 'frightened' the locals were.
 
Remember the "obama report" "Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment" back in 2009 and the reaction to it?



Though the FBI said following the shooting that no one had any idea the man was dangerous, the Southern Poverty Law Center stated that it had been tracking the man for at least 10 years.

So, out of the over 1,000 "hate groups", listed by the SPLC one lone gunman (now dead) committed a single violent attack. That is amazing, meanwhile active street gangs kill hundreds every week.
 
Remember the "obama report" "Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment" back in 2009 and the reaction to it?



Though the FBI said following the shooting that no one had any idea the man was dangerous, the Southern Poverty Law Center stated that it had been tracking the man for at least 10 years.

Well, when the Black Panthers throw a bomb into a hospital one day, you wont be able to say that no one had any idea they were dangerous.
 
Your "logic" is even more so but fails to address the question. The longer videos showing the polling place with the NBPP clowns show how 'frightened' the locals were.

The element of "fear" is not what constitutes legality. I'm not afraid of people who speed on the highway, nevertheless, it's illegal.

Once again, your logic has utterly failed you.....
 
The element of "fear" is not what constitutes legality. I'm not afraid of people who speed on the highway, nevertheless, it's illegal.

Once again, your logic has utterly failed you.....


Gee, if the NBPP clowns were breaking the law, any law, why did the local cop do nothing about it? He was right there through out the whole day. Maybe the locals know a bit more about what happened than your right wing 'sources'
 
Gee, if the NBPP clowns were breaking the law, any law, why did the local cop do nothing about it? He was right there through out the whole day. Maybe the locals know a bit more about what happened than your right wing 'sources'

lol...then you tell me smarty pants. What was the black panther doing there, on election day, in full military garb, wielding a billy club?

For what purpose? Was he swatting flies? Was he exercising and was afraid of being attacked by a stray dog? Was he waiting on a game of baseball to spontaneously break out in the parking lot?

What was his purpose for being there in the first place?

Fact of the matter is clear. He was there to intimidate voters. Listen to what he says to voters entering and exiting the polling place. He wasn't there to play baseball, he wasn't there to swat flies, or defend people from stray dogs. He was there for a single purpose, to intimidate certain voters.

That is a crime.
 
Wrong again. If the KKK is out there talking like this, they should be investigated. Oh wait. THEY ARE ALL THE TIME. If the KKK is inciting violence against blacks across the nation, the DOJ SHOULD step in and do something.

And you have documented proof that they are not being investigated by the DOJ? Is the DOJ in the habit in going out there and telling everyone about who they are investigating? Who says that they are not investigating this new group? Oh yea, a bunch of right wingers with a grudge and no facts.

I would hope that the DOJ would never tell anyone about on going investigations, since it would threaten said investigations.

Once again, I'm not allowing for one, and disallowing for the other. THAT IS WHAT THE LIBERALS DO! It's what YOU just did.

So you were not backing the outcry against the Bush commissioned report on right wing threats in the US, that pretty much everyone on the right attacked and forced the government to down-tone its investigations against right wing groups? You attacked your own on this ....right?

I am in no way advocating not investigating radical violent left wing groups, but considering the lack of "left wing terror" over the last 30 years, then it should in no way be the main priority of law enforcement. Ignoring radical right wing groups over the last 20 years have caused more terror in the US than radical Islamic terror.. and btw.. radical Islamic terror is also right wing.
 
And you have documented proof that they are not being investigated by the DOJ? Is the DOJ in the habit in going out there and telling everyone about who they are investigating? Who says that they are not investigating this new group? Oh yea, a bunch of right wingers with a grudge and no facts.

I would hope that the DOJ would never tell anyone about on going investigations, since it would threaten said investigations.



So you were not backing the outcry against the Bush commissioned report on right wing threats in the US, that pretty much everyone on the right attacked and forced the government to down-tone its investigations against right wing groups? You attacked your own on this ....right?

I am in no way advocating not investigating radical violent left wing groups, but considering the lack of "left wing terror" over the last 30 years, then it should in no way be the main priority of law enforcement. Ignoring radical right wing groups over the last 20 years have caused more terror in the US than radical Islamic terror.. and btw.. radical Islamic terror is also right wing.

Nice try. Holder specifically told his lawyers in the DOJ to drop their investigation into the NBPP. Can you tell me when the attorney general under Bush did any such thing concerning right wing extremist organizations?

Holder specifically informed the Department of Justice, that black on white crimes would not be investigated as hate crimes. He told the investigators to drop their investigation into the voter intimidation case, and to leave it alone. No charges were filed, and nothing happened. Now, if you can show me where any attorney general under Bush ever instructed the DOJ not to investigate certain right wing organizations, I'll concede your point.

So, how do I know the DOJ isn't looking into the NBPP? Because the attorney general, Eric Holder, has specifically instructed the department NOT to.

Yes, the tea party is more dangerous than Occupy. lol....thanks, I needed a good laugh today.
 
Wrong again. If the KKK is out there talking like this, they should be investigated. Oh wait. THEY ARE ALL THE TIME. If the KKK is inciting violence against blacks across the nation, the DOJ SHOULD step in and do something.

Once again, I'm not allowing for one, and disallowing for the other. THAT IS WHAT THE LIBERALS DO! It's what YOU just did.

The KKK has a long long history of not just talking (*cough free speech cough*) but actually acting out in a violent manner. That's why they are under more scrutinty.

So yeah...we have a black President...and apparently that means that black people won't be prosecuted. Thanks for that bit of wisdom from the right.
 
Holder specifically informed the Department of Justice, that black on white crimes would not be investigated as hate crimes.

Show us the quote where he said EXACTLY that and not some dishonest right-wing interpretation of a comment.
 
Don't stop if just a direct quote from Eric Holder, how about examples of that single white racist uttering something bad being taken down? As I recall a certain white supremist gunned down a few Indian folks without a foot at his throat.

You hear about investigations AFTER the fact, be it the FBI infiltrating the anti Vietnam war movement, KKK investigations, the Former panther movement and now the new one. That bombshell arrests are not occurring for some very sensitive to the plight of the poor downtrodden white man in America... :roll:
 
Nice try. Holder specifically told his lawyers in the DOJ to drop their investigation into the NBPP. Can you tell me when the attorney general under Bush did any such thing concerning right wing extremist organizations?

Holder specifically informed the Department of Justice, that black on white crimes would not be investigated as hate crimes. He told the investigators to drop their investigation into the voter intimidation case, and to leave it alone. No charges were filed, and nothing happened. Now, if you can show me where any attorney general under Bush ever instructed the DOJ not to investigate certain right wing organizations, I'll concede your point.

So, how do I know the DOJ isn't looking into the NBPP? Because the attorney general, Eric Holder, has specifically instructed the department NOT to.

And you know this how? Got a link to the memo that states this? Or is it an "anonymous source"?

Yes, the tea party is more dangerous than Occupy. lol....thanks, I needed a good laugh today.

Considering the racist and neo-nazi comments and actions from some parts of the Tea Party.. yes they are more dangerous. Occupy Wall Street is just a bunch of hippies that get beaten up by the police.
 
It seems that the KKK is the white peoples only representative.
Everyone else just turns their back on us.
 
Last edited:
It seems that the KKK is the white peoples only representative.
Everyone else just turns their back in us.

There, there Oppressed White Man™. You always have Rush Limbaugh.
 
There, there Oppressed White Man™. You always have Rush Limbaugh.

There there oppressed liberal.....you always have Al Sharpton....

I'll look for the lawyer who quit the DOJ and told his story. He was the lead investigator in the voter intimidation case. The person Holder specifically told to drop the investigation.
 
And you know this how? Got a link to the memo that states this? Or is it an "anonymous source"?



Considering the racist and neo-nazi comments and actions from some parts of the Tea Party.. yes they are more dangerous. Occupy Wall Street is just a bunch of hippies that get beaten up by the police.

Not anonymous. It was the interview with the lawyer who was in charge of the investigation into the black panther voter intimidation incident. He left the DOJ over it, and told how Holder specifically told him to drop the investigation.
 
So go after those pastors and churches too. I'm not saying stop going after the crazy white people, and just go after blacks. I'm saying, I oppose BOTH. Why don't you?

I'm not saying go after either one. I said they were both kooks not that they should be jailed for what they say. I really don't care what the pastor says or the new black panther party.
 
Your first sentence is the dumbest thing I believe I've ever heard. Yes, we should just ignore them. We should just let them grow more angry in private. We shouldn't bring to light their hatred and violent language. We should just wait until one day they really do throw a bomb in a hospital nursury full of white kids, and then we can deal with it then.....

Great plan buddy.....

Freedom of speech does not mean freedom to incite violence and hate crimes. Freedom of speech does not protect threatening the life of another person in this manner. He's calling on other black people to kill white people. That type of speech is NOT protected. But Obama says nothing, Holder says nothing, the NAACP says nothing, the media says nothing, the newspapers say nothing.

Thank God for Drudge and Brietbart News, and FOX.

Maybe I did jump to conclusions about why someone would post this kind of story. I know Hannity has pumped the "threat" from the new black panther party for it's shock and race baiting value but you're concerned that the black panther party is going to start killing people. My apologies I just assumed the person posting this information was just parroting what they heard from Hannity. Nice imagery black people blowing up white infants in a hospital no less. I don't know where my head was thinking this thread was started for race baiting purposes. It is clearly about equal protection under the law.
 
Back
Top Bottom