• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

New Black Panthers: Where is the DOJ?

Masada

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
3,142
Reaction score
939
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Conservative
I doubt many here will defend the New Black Panther party and the absolutely horrific statements they have made over the course of this year. Here is the latest, which came yesterday.

New Black Panthers to RNC: Our 'Feet Will Be On Your Motherf***ing Necks'

My question is, where is the Department of Justice on this? If this was a single white supremacist in Montana, the DOJ would be all over him, and rightfully so. There shouldn't be any kind of prejudice on this kind of language. This type of language coming out of the New Black Panther Party is inciting violence, and I mean severe violence. There are spokesmen for the NBPP who have called for the killing of "white babies", even 3 seconds after they are born. They have called for black people to "throw bombs into nursuries" killing all the white babies they can. They claim that black people are "just too scared" to drag white people from their homes and "skin them alive", "pour acid on them", "hit them in the head with a rock", and "throw them in the river".

Imagine the mainstream media's reaction if this were coming from a white supremacist group. If they were saying these types of things about black people. It would be headline news. We have a serious problem brewing, and the DOJ is doing nothing about it. It's shameful. Just one more reason that Obama must go, so he can take all his cronies with him. What has happened to liberals? They will not tolerate the opinion of a CEO over same sex marriage, but they will allow this type of language to go unchallenged, undenounced, and uninvestigated. Makes me sick to my stomach.
 
Give it up dude... Obama's DOJ has given those racist thugs a lifetime pass. They can threaten people, call for violence against anyone they want, and intimidate people at polling stations with full presidential immunity.
 
Irrelevant group is irrelevant. The NBP is Neo-Nazi material. Until they're actually caught doing something, nothing will happen to them and they'll be more than capable of writing music, songs and expressing their feelings out openly.
 
Give it up dude... Obama's DOJ has given those racist thugs a lifetime pass. They can threaten people, call for violence against anyone they want, and intimidate people at polling stations with full presidential immunity.

Really? Did Bush's DOJ do anything about the NBP? :) Show us.
 
I doubt many here will defend the New Black Panther party and the absolutely horrific statements they have made over the course of this year. Here is the latest, which came yesterday.

New Black Panthers to RNC: Our 'Feet Will Be On Your Motherf***ing Necks'

My question is, where is the Department of Justice on this? If this was a single white supremacist in Montana, the DOJ would be all over him, and rightfully so. There shouldn't be any kind of prejudice on this kind of language. This type of language coming out of the New Black Panther Party is inciting violence, and I mean severe violence. There are spokesmen for the NBPP who have called for the killing of "white babies", even 3 seconds after they are born. They have called for black people to "throw bombs into nursuries" killing all the white babies they can. They claim that black people are "just too scared" to drag white people from their homes and "skin them alive", "pour acid on them", "hit them in the head with a rock", and "throw them in the river".

Imagine the mainstream media's reaction if this were coming from a white supremacist group. If they were saying these types of things about black people. It would be headline news. We have a serious problem brewing, and the DOJ is doing nothing about it. It's shameful. Just one more reason that Obama must go, so he can take all his cronies with him. What has happened to liberals? They will not tolerate the opinion of a CEO over same sex marriage, but they will allow this type of language to go unchallenged, undenounced, and uninvestigated. Makes me sick to my stomach.

If they are inciting violence by their rhetoric what are you inciting by posting their rhetoric. Do a youtube search on pastor's and gay marriage to see if you find anything where the pastor says they should be put in electrified fences and use helicopters to drop food to them. There are kooks of all stripes and for the most part people ignore them.
 
Irrelevant group is irrelevant. The NBP is Neo-Nazi material. Until they're actually caught doing something, nothing will happen to them and they'll be more than capable of writing music, songs and expressing their feelings out openly.

Voter intimidation?

Ask Holder why he made his people drop the charges and told them to no longer investigate the incident.
 
Irrelevant group is irrelevant. The NBP is Neo-Nazi material. Until they're actually caught doing something, nothing will happen to them and they'll be more than capable of writing music, songs and expressing their feelings out openly.

Oh, you mean like being caught outside voting houses with billy clubs and military attire? Oh wait, that didn't count.

I wonder if a redneck stood outside a voting house in a black neighborhood, wielding a deer rifle, and wearing a sheriff's uniform, if the DOJ would of had something to say about that???
 
Really? Did Bush's DOJ do anything about the NBP? :) Show us.

Is Bush president, or is Obama?

Oh, I get it... Trying the lame ass switch-a-roo tactic.

Sorry pal, I'm not biting.
 
I wonder how many pastors have been caught standing out side voting stations with night sticks trying to intimidate voters?
 
If they are inciting violence by their rhetoric what are you inciting by posting their rhetoric. Do a youtube search on pastor's and gay marriage to see if you find anything where the pastor says they should be put in electrified fences and use helicopters to drop food to them. There are kooks of all stripes and for the most part people ignore them.

So go after those pastors and churches too. I'm not saying stop going after the crazy white people, and just go after blacks. I'm saying, I oppose BOTH. Why don't you?
 
Really? Did Bush's DOJ do anything about the NBP? :) Show us.

They weren't making those comments then, because they knew the Bush admin would have them thrown under the jailhouse. They are emboldened because we have a black president, and a black attorney general. In addition to that, they have already been excused for their voter intimidation actions, with not so much as a scolding. Because the DOJ and the Obama admin do nothing, their language gets more violent, and so will their actions, because they feel immune.
 
If they are inciting violence by their rhetoric what are you inciting by posting their rhetoric. Do a youtube search on pastor's and gay marriage to see if you find anything where the pastor says they should be put in electrified fences and use helicopters to drop food to them. There are kooks of all stripes and for the most part people ignore them.

Your first sentence is the dumbest thing I believe I've ever heard. Yes, we should just ignore them. We should just let them grow more angry in private. We shouldn't bring to light their hatred and violent language. We should just wait until one day they really do throw a bomb in a hospital nursury full of white kids, and then we can deal with it then.....

Great plan buddy.....

Freedom of speech does not mean freedom to incite violence and hate crimes. Freedom of speech does not protect threatening the life of another person in this manner. He's calling on other black people to kill white people. That type of speech is NOT protected. But Obama says nothing, Holder says nothing, the NAACP says nothing, the media says nothing, the newspapers say nothing.

Thank God for Drudge and Brietbart News, and FOX.
 
Is Bush president, or is Obama?

Oh, I get it... Trying the lame ass switch-a-roo tactic.

Sorry pal, I'm not biting.

Why is it relevant? You're claiming Obama gave them a free pass where they didn't have one before. Now show us what the Bush administration did about the NBP.
 
Why is it relevant? You're claiming Obama gave them a free pass where they didn't have one before. Now show us what the Bush administration did about the NBP.

Still not taking the bait... Now care to comment on how Obama's DOJ has ignored their BS?
 
They weren't making those comments then

Bull****:

Here is Khalid Mohammed FOUNDER of the NBP in 2000.

Embedded media from this media site is no longer available
 
Still not taking the bait... Now care to comment on how Obama's DOJ has ignored their BS?

No bait. You're a dishonest person who got caught making things up. I'll post evidence of the NBPP getting a "free pass" BEFORE Obama was elected. You'll run away like you always do when confronted with evidence that isn't provided by MRC.
 
No bait. You're a dishonest person who got caught making things up. I'll post evidence of the NBPP getting a "free pass" BEFORE Obama was elected. You'll run away like you always do when confronted with evidence that isn't provided by MRC.

Nobody dare get the race card tossed at them so nothing is ever said or done "officially". Just as Muslims/blacks are allowed to openly oppose "gay rights" but let a white Christian say the same thing and it is time for a boycott. The NBPP has too few members to do much of anything but make noise.
 
Oh, you mean like being caught outside voting houses with billy clubs and military attire? Oh wait, that didn't count.

I wonder if a redneck stood outside a voting house in a black neighborhood, wielding a deer rifle, and wearing a sheriff's uniform, if the DOJ would of had something to say about that???

They certainly had "nothing to say" in 2006 when a Minuteman activist named Roy Warden showed up at a majority Hispanic polling place in Arizona
In Arizona, Roy Warden, an anti-immigration activist with the Minutemen, and a handful of supporters staked out a Tucson precinct and questioned Hispanic voters at the polls to determine whether they spoke English.... Armed with a 9mm Glock automatic strapped to his side, Warden said he planned to photograph Hispanic voters entering polls in an effort to identify illegal immigrants and felons.

A little bit on the situation in Arizona from the US Commission on Civil Rights report on the New Black Panthers incident, pg 17
In another case, in Arizona, the complaint
14 was received by a national civil rights organization
15 regarding events in Pima, Arizona in the 2006 election
16 when three well-known anti-immigrant advocates
17 affiliated with the Minutemen, one of whom was
18 carrying a gun, allegedly intimidated Latino voters at
19 a polling place by approaching several persons,
20 filming them, and advocating and printing voting
21 materials in Spanish.
22 In that instance, the Department declined
23 to bring any action for alleged voter intimidation,
24 notwithstanding the requests of the complaining
25 parties.

See the difference? The Bush DoJ refused to "bring any action ... notwithstanding the requests" in 2006. In the Philadelphia incident, not one voter registered at that polling place filed a complaint - it was outside Republican activists who claimed there was "voter intimidation"
 
Last edited:
Nobody dare get the race card tossed at them so nothing is ever said "officially". Just as Muslims/blacks are allowed to openly oppose "gay rights" but let a white Christian say the same thing and it is time for a boycott. The NBPP has too few members to do much of anything but make noise.

White Christians? You act as if McChurches run by white pastors didn't have black people in them. "Black churches" simply don't have the media relevance that megachurches run by white pastors do. A church of 300 people in LA doesn't have Jerry Falwell's appeal. It's a matter of sociopolitical relevance. The day black churches become politically relevant as a cohesive unit, then we'll see these pastors getting publicly chastised a la Wright. However, until then, you can only hope they grow in size so you can attack them or continue being irrelevant.
 
White Christians? You act as if McChurches run by white pastors didn't have black people in them. "Black churches" simply don't have the media relevance that megachurches run by white pastors do. A church of 300 people in LA doesn't have Jerry Falwell's appeal. It's a matter of sociopolitical relevance. The day black churches become politically relevant as a cohesive unit, then we'll see these pastors getting publicly chastised a la Wright. However, until then, you can only hope they grow in size so you can attack them or continue being irrelevant.

Compare the reaction of Rahm's "Chicago values" BS against the CFA CEO, Cathy and then placing his arm around Farrakhan. Who is more anti-gay (or Jew) Cathy or Farrakhan? Black churches are plenty politically active and as anti-gay as any in the nation, yet they get a pass because the race card trumps the gay card every time. Yes they can!
 
Compare the reaction of Rahm's "Chicago values" BS against the CFA CEO, Cathy and then placing his arm around Farrakhan. Who is more anti-gay (or Jew) Cathy or Farrakhan? Black churches are plenty politically active and as anti-gay as any in the nation, yet they get a pass because the race card trumps the gay card every time. Yes they can!

Again, who is Farrakhan? The guy is for all intended purposes irrelevant on the grand scale. Whenever these guys are running through the WH and telling people they have Obama's ear, then you'll have a point. Until then, still irrelevant. This isn't the 1990s for heaven's sake.
 
White Christians? You act as if McChurches run by white pastors didn't have black people in them. "Black churches" simply don't have the media relevance that megachurches run by white pastors do. A church of 300 people in LA doesn't have Jerry Falwell's appeal. It's a matter of sociopolitical relevance. The day black churches become politically relevant as a cohesive unit, then we'll see these pastors getting publicly chastised a la Wright. However, until then, you can only hope they grow in size so you can attack them or continue being irrelevant.

It's all a big Liberal plot to opress white people...unless they're gay.
 
They certainly had "nothing to say" in 2006 when a Minuteman activist named Roy Warden showed up at a majority Hispanic polling place in Arizona
In Arizona, Roy Warden, an anti-immigration activist with the Minutemen, and a handful of supporters staked out a Tucson precinct and questioned Hispanic voters at the polls to determine whether they spoke English.... Armed with a 9mm Glock automatic strapped to his side, Warden said he planned to photograph Hispanic voters entering polls in an effort to identify illegal immigrants and felons.

A little bit on the situation in Arizona from the US Commission on Civil Rights report on the New Black Panthers incident, pg 17


See the difference? The Bush DoJ refused to "bring any action ... notwithstanding the requests" in 2006. In the Philadelphia incident, not one voter registered at that polling place filed a complaint - it was outside Republican activists who claimed there was "voter intimidation"

I oppose BOTH. Why don't you? It's wrong either way, not just one way. You are condoning the practice of the BBPP simply because the Bush administration made the same mistake? That's kind of dumb. The difference is, I oppose BOTH, and you don't. Why?
 
Again, who is Farrakhan? The guy is for all intended purposes irrelevant on the grand scale. Whenever these guys are running through the WH and telling people they have Obama's ear, then you'll have a point. Until then, still irrelevant. This isn't the 1990s for heaven's sake.

LOL. Black's hardly ever vote as a block. If you think that the demorats would ever disrespect the "black leaders" then you are insane. Your excuse that NBPP voter intimidation or wanted "dead or alive" bounties is no big deal because blacks are not powerful ignores that neither are the minutemen. Either you enforce the law or you do not, but selective enforcement (Obama style) is dangerous. If you send in the DOJ for some "civil rights" cases and tell them to back off on others, then you have a problem.
 
Back
Top Bottom