In the US people *do* end up getting shot because some paranoid dumbass pulls out a gun and a situation escalates far beyond the point that it needed to.And people complain about gun laws all the time. Both in Canada and in the US. Yet you don't see them automatically pulling out guns the moment they feel threatened do you? Hell, we complain about gun laws lots here at DP for one example.
Well that guy being nervous for ten seconds isn't a good enough reason. The funny thing is, I'm not even necessarily opposed to carrying weapons (depending on the place and circumstance). But if this guy's intent was to make people more sympathetic to that point of view, he's had precisely the opposite effect.It would have mattered had they been in any danger. And there is no evidence that they would have been had the guy had his gun with him. Again....all that he said is that he would have felt safer with it. Feeling safer =/= will cause trouble or shoot someone with gun if they have it.
Who said that they're ALWAYS the ones to start ****? I'm saying that in this particular case, if he had a gun and **** went down, it would have been because he started it. How do I know this? Because nothing happened to him!Idiocy. Just because someone has a gun does not mean that they are the ones to always start ****.