• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Showdown over Bush tax cuts Wednesday

You have provided no statement from the Treasury that refutes the study by the CBO.

In between your searches to try to find an organization as authoritative as the CBO to back up your claim, see the ultra conservative, turtledude's posts above where he agrees the rich benefited most from the Bush tax cuts.

in my searches cbo has been refuted by almost everyone,I AOLSO SAID CBO SAYS THE ACA WILL COST AMERICA 4 MILLION JOBS LOST<WHICH YOU STILL REFUSE TO ANSWER ON!!!!!!!!!!!!!


cbo also waffled on every issue,they have been through obamacare will reduce spending to it will cost us over a trillion.just the fact you google is cbo and the autocomplete says is the cbo reliable.cbo is not accurate,never has been,and never will be.when an organization can be debunked by every single independant organization and debunked by itself every few months,it can in no way be accurate.
 
So you are finally coming around now to agreeing with the CBO study?

basically by you answer any tax cut affects the rich more,through skewered lying math,thanks for admitting it.
 
in my searches cbo has been refuted by almost everyone,I AOLSO SAID CBO SAYS THE ACA WILL COST AMERICA 4 MILLION JOBS LOST<WHICH YOU STILL REFUSE TO ANSWER ON!!!!!!!!!!!!!


cbo also waffled on every issue,they have been through obamacare will reduce spending to it will cost us over a trillion.just the fact you google is cbo and the autocomplete says is the cbo reliable.cbo is not accurate,never has been,and never will be.when an organization can be debunked by every single independant organization and debunked by itself every few months,it can in no way be accurate.


You bad mouth the CBO and then quote them on a different topic. That's rich, but you still haven't backed up your claim that the rich didn't benefit the most from the Bush tax cuts as the CBO study showed.

You have failed.
 
You bad mouth the CBO and then quote them on a different topic. That's rich, but you still haven't backed up your claim that the rich didn't benefit the most from the Bush tax cuts as the CBO study showed.

You have failed.

nor have you,you have presented 3 links that say our math is good trust us!!!!!!!!!!!


and you still wont bring up the obamacare claim,9i guarantee if i made a topic about it,liberals would come in droves to say cbo is inaccurate,dont believe me ill do it.
 
nor have you,you have presented 3 links that say our math is good trust us!!!!!!!!!!!


and you still wont bring up the obamacare claim,9i guarantee if i made a topic about it,liberals would come in droves to say cbo is inaccurate,dont believe me ill do it.


I referenced the study by the CBO that you have yet to refute. All you have done is try to change the subject.
 
I referenced the study by the CBO that you have yet to refute. All you have done is try to change the subject.

can you cite even one example,just one of cbo being right???

i cited the treasury dept,and you completely ignored an org that hasnt been proven wrong and defended an org that has never been proven right,and cant even prove how its math came to be.

if you would like i can post links,but they wont be left wing links,as left wingers wont attack their own cause,no matter how wrong their math is.but if you want i will gladly link them,then call youna hack if you try and deny them for being right wing links.
 
can you cite even one example,just one of cbo being right???

I already have above. Even the ultra-conservative turtledude agreed.

i cited the treasury dept,and you completely ignored an org that hasnt been proven wrong and defended an org that has never been proven right,and cant even prove how its math came to be.

I have not seen a statement by the Treasury saying the rich did not benefit the most from the Bush tax cuts.

if you would like i can post links,but they wont be left wing links,as left wingers wont attack their own cause,no matter how wrong their math is.but if you want i will gladly link them,then call youna hack if you try and deny them for being right wing links.

There is no more authoritative source than the CBO that has said the rich did not benefit most from the Bush tax cuts.

You have failed to back up your claim, but rather than admit your failure you keep highlighting it for everyone to see!
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom