• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Alabama Pastor holds 'whites only' conference

rocket88 said:
As opposed to conservatives who think it should be legal to burn crosses, but not the flag?
Click to expand...
As long as it belongs to you burn it or keep it.

Nobody's saying it should be "illegal." But we are calling this out for what it is - a bunch of prejudiced white guys burning a cross. Which sounds exactly like a KKK meeting to me.
Click to expand...
What would be different if they have real grievances? Isn't that why they held their meeting? By the way, what happened? Did anything bad happen?
 
Misterveritis said:
As long as it belongs to you burn it or keep it.


What would be different if they have real grievances? Isn't that why they held their meeting? By the way, what happened? Did anything bad happen?
Click to expand...


"real grievances" or imagined ones. The threat remains even when nothing has happened so far.
 
Misterveritis said:
It occurs to me that we are in the mess we are in because many people think that the government is there to take from one group to "help" another group. Once governments start down that path the end will be tyranny. States cannot get there without massive taxes and massive regulations. In my opinion that is why governments fail.
Click to expand...

Possibly, but this has nothing to do with the charge of racism.
 
Thunder said:
that's not the meaning of racism.

so by your own admission, the CBC isn't racist.
Click to expand...

of course they aren't racist... we all know that the color of your skin determines how effectively you can govern your constituency... ain't that right, Thunder?
 
Zyphlin said:
Again I ask. Provide me a quote, or even something arguably similar, of the CBC stating that the black race is the "Chosen People"
Click to expand...
First, why would I do such a thing? What possible relevance does it have? The congressional black caucus was created to gain power and to provide government benefits to blacks.

Of ocusre you won't provide such a thing,
Click to expand...
Perhaps it is the nature of your request that is the problem. It is a silly request.

you'll just continue to try and ignore the topic, continue to refrain from saying even a mild word of rebuke towards the group that's ACTUALLY being discussed in the OP,
Click to expand...

Why do you believe they must be rebuked? What harm did they do?
refused to actually take even CLOSE to the similar stand in terms of accusations of that group
Click to expand...
Because that group is not relevant. They have no power to tax me. They have no power over me whatsoever. But the congressional black caucus does make efforts to take my property, and therefore my liberty, for the good of blacks. Not for the good of the people in general. But for those who share their skin color.

as you do to liberals in general, the CBC, or other "left" groups,
Click to expand...
It is generally the leftists who believe that all wealth created by the people belongs to the government. If leftists were not so dangerous to our liberties I would not care. But leftists are dangerous. So leftists must be defeated. It really is that simple.

and then continue to act all offended and shocked when people suggest that there is tacit approval or at the very least acceptance by some in this thread of the KKK and OBVIOUS racism and suggest that you're attempting to distract by childish whining of "BUT BUT...LIBERALS ARE BAD!" while trying to defend and/or excuse the grou pi nthe OP
Click to expand...
I cannot recall acting offended or shocked. They are irrelevant.
If they are racist I go right back to my question. So? Therefore what? What can they do to you? What can they do to me? Nothing.

Liberals are bad so long as they have power.
 
Somerville said:
"real grievances" or imagined ones. The threat remains even when nothing has happened so far.
Click to expand...
Who gets to decide if their grievances are real or if they are imagined?

What was the threat? Who was threatened?
 
Thunder said:
no, its a KKK meeting.
Click to expand...

Not Sponsored by the KKK...so no it isn't.

It is irrelevant. They have every right to have and hold the meeting (given they have permission to be where they are). Does it make it "right" or "just?" I could care less. Why? Haters gonna hate. Be they white, black, brown, brown-ish, or purple. I support their right, because it supports OUR right. Anyone who disagrees with that...well...is basically on THEIR side.
 
Hare said:
So you start a thread specifically for the purpose of excusing the actions of the Klan? Pray tell what motivation lies behind a topic such as this?
Click to expand...
Are you serious Hare???__This is actually the message you concluded from the OP?!?

Your thought processes, including analytical abilities, have been seriously compromised by political correctness_

Apparently 7 others who posted "Likes" to your assumption suffer from the same mental programming as you_

The fact that so many have lost the ability to think and reason for themselves without even realizing it is scarey_

Thunder said:
um....these folks are white supremacist racists, KKK-members, who will burn a cross at the end of the meeting.

why should they get our sympathy?
Click to expand...
Exactly where is it suggested that these or any other racists for that matter should "get our sympathy"?!

Wiggen said:
Gosh, someone defending racism and it turns out to be you. What a surprise! Do you plan on attending the cross burning?
Click to expand...
If you could get past the programming which formulates your racial opinions for you, it would be all too obvious that I am not defending racism but am in fact criticizing those who accept and condone it_

The article I posted was simply a vehicle to deliver a very unique point that is rarely discussed, which to the clear and free thinking mind was totally obvious but not to the minds edited for content by political correctness_

It's not so much that PC won't allow you to consider the validity of another point of view, but that it doesn't even allow you to see another point of view by demanding that you dismiss and attack it immediately as "racist"_
 
If you have a problem with Nazi Germany, slavery, the imperialist rape of the Belgian Congo, operation Cast Lead or any banana republic general killing a bunch of nuns and shoving them in an unmarked ditch, you are simply boring people to tears with your political correctness.
 
Empirica said:
The article I posted was simply a vehicle to deliver a very unique point that is rarely discussed, which to the clear and free thinking mind was totally obvious but not to the minds edited for content by political correctness_
_
Click to expand...


and just what is this "very unique point that is rarely discussed"? So obviously I have a clouded and imprisoned mind as I don't find your "point" to be very obvious.
 
Tomfoolery said:
If you have a problem with Nazi Germany, slavery, the imperialist rape of the Belgian Congo, operation Cast Lead or any banana republic general killing a bunch of nuns and shoving them in an unmarked ditch, you are simply boring people to tears with your political correctness.
Click to expand...

having a problem with American slavery and the Nazis, makes one "politically correct"?
 
Somerville said:
and just what is this "very unique point that is rarely discussed"? So obviously I have a clouded and imprisoned mind as I don't find your "point" to be very obvious.
Click to expand...
Thunder said:
why did you put "racial exclusion", in Italics?

do you not think its really going on in this event?
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
I would dearly love to include you guys in this discussion but apparently it's way above pay grade_
 
Thunder said:
having a problem with American slavery and the Nazis, makes one "politically correct"?
Click to expand...

Only if one is a racist, right wing ideologue. Don't blame me, I don't write their material, I just have observed it over and over. The pattern is say or insinuate any revolting idea and when someone identifies it, accuse them of PC.
 
johnny_rebson said:
Why is it every time whites intentionally exclude blacks, they get compared to the KKK?
Click to expand...

It isn't just if it is intentional, but simple answer:

Because you aren't allowed to exclude anyone unless they are conservative, white, Christian, and basically just anybody that isn't a democrat lol.
 
Tomfoolery said:
Only if one is a racist, right wing ideologue. Don't blame me, I don't write their material, I just have observed it over and over. The pattern is say or insinuate any revolting idea and when someone identifies it, accuse them of PC.
Click to expand...
Say or insinuate anything race related that doesn't identify with PC and get accused of racism_

You tell me Tofoo, what's the difference???
 
Thunder said:
yes, only a racist would want to specifically exclude white people as well.

doesn't it go without saying?
Click to expand...

what about only wacking it to asian-squid porn, is that racist?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom