I am confused. So PP is not completely privately funded? Why would the state be required to fund them?
It may be that your sole purpose in life is simply to serve as a warning to others.
No story on this seems to indicate quite how the judge finds it's unconstitutional.
Is in no way a constitutional argument."The court is particularly influenced by the potential for immediate loss of access to necessary medical services by several thousand Texas women," Yeakel wrote in his ruling. "The record before the court at this juncture reflects uncertainty as to the continued viability of the Texas Women's Health Program."
2001-2008: Dissent is the highest form of patriotism.
2009-2016: Dissent is the highest form of racism.
2017-? (Probably): Dissent is the highest form of misogyny.
“Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest of men will do the most wickedest of things for the greatest good of everyone.” John Maynard Keynes
I wonder if our new system in Texas is going to include things like prenatal care, housing, baby formula like PP has done in the past.
“If we must have an enemy at the head of Government, let it be one whom we can oppose, and for whom we are not responsible, who will not involve our party in the disgrace of his foolish and bad measures.”
- Alexander Hamilton. Spiritual father of #NeverTrump