There are a couple of problems with your statements. 1) I would like some specific contradictions, historically, that you find in the Bible. Not spiritual contradictions, historical ones. 2) What version of archaelogy are we talking about? The one where archaeologists have mislabeled many of the Earth's layers and added years upon years to them? When the measuring unit being used is inaccurate, naturally the results will be off. For instance, it has been said and is taken as fact that Joshua did not conquer Jericho but merely came upon the city after it was deserted. Even after evidence of a wall was found, a portion of it is collapsed, and that portion is burnt. The conclusion was that Joshua had broken the wall down and burnt it to make it look like he conquered the city or he came upon it like that and simply took credit for it. So the question is, why would Joshua do this? It makes no sense. If the town was deserted, then people of that day would know it was deserted. Therefore, the story given would have been a laughingstock because all of the people of the time would have known it to be untrue. The Bible wasn't written just for future readers. People of that day read it as well. In addition, no documents have been found to support the theory that Joshua made it up. The only thing that supports the theory is the faulty dating scale used by archaeologists. After that, its pure speculation.