• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

U.S. Supreme Court: State Medical Marijuana Laws Not Preempted by Federal Law

danarhea

Slayer of the DP Newsbot
DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 27, 2005
Messages
43,602
Reaction score
26,256
Location
Houston, TX
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
WASHINGTON, DC – The U.S. Supreme Court refused to review a landmark decision today in which California state courts found that its medical marijuana law was not preempted by federal law. The state appellate court decision from November 28, 2007, ruled that “it is not the job of the local police to enforce the federal drug laws.”

It is now settled law that police cannot seize marijuana because they happen to prefer Federal law over the laws of their own states.

This is the first nail in the coffin of the War on Drugs.... More nails to come.

Article is here.
 
It is now settled law that police cannot seize marijuana because they happen to prefer Federal law over the laws of their own states.

This is the first nail in the coffin of the War on Drugs.... More nails to come.

Article is here.

I agree with your assessment. About damned time.
 
It is now settled law that police cannot seize marijuana because they happen to prefer Federal law over the laws of their own states.

This is the first nail in the coffin of the War on Drugs.... More nails to come.

Article is here.

I kind of agree with that.Its not the job of local law enforcement to enforce federal laws that contradict state laws.Now if the state made marijuana possession and use illegal the that would be a different story.
 
Whoever sponsored this action needs to be put in the limelight more often and applauded.
 
Back
Top Bottom