• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

O'Keefe Voter Fraud Investigation: Young Man Offered Holder's Ballot

How many times do I have to explain it? If it costs more than it saves, it's idiotic to use it. "Improvement" implies that it eliminates frauds at a larger number than it disenfranchises, and I have explained why this solution doesn't do that many times already.

No need to explain further because no one is being "disenfranchised". Nobody.

That's what's called a "Re Herring".
 
No, they did a study to look at all the cases of in person voter fraud that ever come up. That is the closest to scientific of all the evidence available.

Did they acknowledge the inability to truly gauge the scope of the problem because of the lack of oversight in the entire process?


How many times do I have to explain it? If it costs more than it saves, it's idiotic to use it. "Improvement" implies that it eliminates frauds at a larger number than it disenfranchises, and I have explained why this solution doesn't do that many times already.

This is nonsense. What value do you place on lessening voter fraud? You haven’t explained jack ****, you have offered your opinion, and I reject your opinion.
 
Back
Top Bottom