The people that have been stirring up racial hatred for personal gain for the last three weeks. No 'other words' needed. If you are an asshole you are an asshole. Your skin color doesnt change that.
No. Learn to debate. I commented on how this made Zimmerman look. If you took the time to realize the difference between A) offering proof B) making a claim and C) commenting on the matter, you wouldn't look so bad to begin with. The rest of your post? Boring bull**** to duck and hide away from the fact you don't realize the difference between A - B and C. Go troll elsewhere?
Now as far as the actual statement goes - hey, it DOES make Zimmerman look like a racist when the people rushing to his defence are avowed racists and not the pretend kind like Sharpton. You know, not people who have a popularity stake in this but an ideological stake in race debates. :shrug:
Originally Posted by Hatuey
... Nothing says you're not racist like having Neo-Nazi's protecting you
This time the racist Trayvon failed to win in his assault or to murder a Latino.
Possibly if his parents weren't such racists themselves this would not have happened. Neo-naizis weren't protecting Zimmerman when Trayvon decided to beat Zimmerman to death because Trayvon is a racist. It is unfortunate too many African-Americans try to instill race-hartred in the next generation of African-Americans.
Armed Neo-Nazis Now Patrolling Sanford, Say They Are "Prepared" For Post-Trayvon Martin Violence UPDATED - Miami News - Riptide 2.0
Although it is stated that nobody has seen these people yet, I find it interesting. Looks like white people are coming in to protect their own. The blacks want a race riot, they're going to get one, but they're going to regret it.
you seem to have forgotten what you posted, when you spin too much you tend to lose track of what you originally said:
Moderator's Warning: |
Next personal attack gets removed from the thread. |
Look you made the claim.
Do... you... know what a claim is? Seriously, first you said I provided PROOF. When your ridiculous CLAIM got shot down by what I can only assume was your own little trip to Wikipedia, you changed your story to saying I myself made a claim. Now here is a claim as an example: George Zimmerman is a racist. Can you figure out a way to add PROOF to that sentence?
Lord. You made a claim. I quoted it.
Underlined---STOP IT. Lefthanded compliments are not appreciated.
Which is interesting with respect to this case, since Zimmerman is vaguely Hispanic and has a Jewish name.
This the same group that some Fox News local channel called a "civil rights group"?
Does that change that they have in fact been there stirring things up and causing racial tensions? When this issue first hit most people were upset and wanted a more full investigation...myself included. Most people I know think Zimmerman is responsible due to his overzealous actions and bad decisions. Race didnt even need to enter into the equation...still doesnt. There is no real evidence that the hispanic man shot the black man for racial reasons and whatever 'evidence' we have been shown so far has been proven to have been intentionally tainted by the media to sensationalize the story.and you don't think black people would have been pissed about this without them 'agitatas' stirring things up? Really?
Really? I thought I provided proof. Which is it? Get your story straight or I'll report you for trolling me.
You can now read my mind? I guess you haven't gone to Wikipedia. I suggest you do. It'll explain to you the difference between a A) statement B) claim and C) proof.
and you don't think black people would have been pissed about this without them 'agitatas' stirring things up? Really?
Does that change that they have in fact been there stirring things up and causing racial tensions? When this issue first hit most people were upset and wanted a more full investigation...myself included. Most people I know think Zimmerman is responsible due to his overzealous actions and bad decisions. Race didnt even need to enter into the equation...still doesnt. There is no real evidence that the hispanic man shot the black man for racial reasons and whatever 'evidence' we have been shown so far has been proven to have been intentionally tainted by the media to sensationalize the story.
Please to be linking. Thanks. Also you do realize that local affiliates are independent right?
Civil rights group patrolling Sanford.flv - YouTube!
And so what if they are so called independent.. the culture of the parent company bleeds down.
imho, There is a difference between having a right to do something and that something being a good idea.Well, if muslims, blacks, hispanics and jews all have a right to protest armed in the streets, why not these people?
Oh no, guilt by association would mean there is no association to begin with. As Neo-Nazis want to actively defend Mr Zimmerman, there is AN EXISTING association. Learn to debate?
Afaict, the racial issue has been more w/ the SPD than w/ Z.I'm not going to say that race is not still a huge issue in this country, but it looks like the people most interested in stirring up **** in this particular case are the media. Whether or not Zimmerman broke the law and acted with reckless or malicious intent when he shot Martin, there is not a whole lot of evidence that he cared about the kid's race all that much. This has not stopped the media from fabricating a certain narrative in order to get more attention. Few topics make Americans more uncomfortable or susceptible to outrage than race, and the media has repeatedly distorted and played up certain things to make Sanford look like 1994 Watts. What happened was a tragedy, but what is needed is an investigation, not attention-whoring off of two people.
Good, they shouldn't.Of course the media aren't reporting this....
New Black Panthers: Race War For Trayvon April 9th 'Day of Action'
Oh no, guilt by association would mean there is no association to begin with. As Neo-Nazis want to actively defend Mr Zimmerman, there is AN EXISTING association. Learn to debate?