• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Israel Asks for Bunker Buster

No, it doesn't, you made that up. Prove to me it says that.

After being accused of lying i feel somewhat reluctant to find the exact part of the non-proliferation treaty concerned when you could easily Google it. If i am to do your research for you then i think i deserve a reward. How about a signature bet?
 
After being accused of lying i feel somewhat reluctant to find the exact part of the non-proliferation treaty concerned when you could easily Google it. If i am to do your research for you then i think i deserve a reward. How about a signature bet?

What the hell are you talking about? I produced links, one thing that bozo who keeps attacking me has not done is produce any proof, but a website on wiki stating that the UN didn't vote on anything about war in Iraq. Apparently he didn't even read his own link!!

This proposed resolution was subsequently withdrawn when it became clear that several permanent members of the Council would cast no votes on any new resolution, thereby vetoing it.

It was never VOTED ON, how the hell could it have been vetoed??? You can't say the UN did something when the UN resolution about the war directly was withdrawn and not put up for a vote. We don't know what WOULD have happened, but it was not vetoed. Your foot is so deep in your mouth at this point......

I restate the obvious, they voted 15-0 in favor of 1441.....ya know what, this thread isn't about Iraq.

So yea, please show me where in the NPT it says that the USA MUST disarm? It doesn't say that. It says the GOAL is disarmament. You can't just say "it says it" without proof. I've shown lots of proof. You and your buddy here have shown nothing.

More proof: (actual wording of the NPT)

Declaring their intention to achieve at the earliest possible date the cessation of the nuclear arms race and to undertake effective measures in the direction of nuclear disarmament,

UNODA - Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT)

So yea, I'll take your bet, and I already won. That is directly from the treaty itself. It does not MANDATE nuclear disarmament. it says in the DIRECTION OF disarmament. And we have been reducing our stockpiles for decades. So we are in full compliance.

So what do I win?
 
Last edited:
What the hell are you talking about? I produced links, one thing that bozo who keeps attacking me has not done is produce any proof, but a website on wiki stating that the UN didn't vote on anything about war in Iraq. Apparently he didn't even read his own link!!
Moron, your capacity for selective attention is almost as staggering as the deficiency of your intellect.

The link would probably suggest more to one with an IQ beyond that of pond life.

I'm never the one to employ the first insult. It's a policy.
 
Moron, your capacity for selective attention is almost as staggering as the deficiency of your intellect.

The link would probably suggest more to one with an IQ beyond that of pond life.

I'm never the one to employ the first insult. It's a policy.

LOL ignored my entire post LOL

I didn't say WHO was a bozo, but if the shoe fits....
 
LOL ignored my entire post LOL

I didn't say WHO was a bozo, but if the shoe fits....
...one thing that bozo who keeps attacking me has not done is produce any proof, but a website on wiki stating that the UN didn't vote on anything about war in Iraq. Apparently he didn't even read his own link!!

Pretty suggestive, really. I don't believe the mods would fail to get the gist of who you were referring to.

;)
 
Pretty suggestive, really. I don't believe the mods would fail to get the gist of who you were referring to.

;)

Gist isn't against the rules, direct attacks are. Multiple members of this forum have told you that you have participated in personal attacks. Might want to cool it if you dont want a vacation.
 
Gist isn't against the rules, direct attacks are. Multiple members of this forum have told you that you have participated in personal attacks. Might want to cool it if you dont want a vacation.
Extend me the proper form, and I'll reciprocate. Do otherwise, and expect a response in kind.

You cannot casually bait/flame/troll someone, and expect that your comments will go unanswered. You initiated hostilities. The mods can easily check the post sequence, as can anyone else.

And aside from Thunder (who made his own personal remarks), there are no 'multiple members' who have commented.

Oh, and several of your own insults were direct.
 
Tag team.

Let's see what the mods decide, eh?
 
Moderator's Warning:
If we do not calm it down, more infractions will be coming. Do not play moderator. If you feel a post is against the rules, report it then ignore it.
 
I wish this thread could be divided into two, as one part was about Israel and the BB bomb and then another part about Iran. I think both are wonderful discussions, but are separate topics. I know mods on this forum (and a forum I was a mod on) hesitate to split threads because then it can get confusing.
 
You make **** up as you go along. [...] (Oh yea, we were justified going into Iraq, I have no idea what UN vote you're talking about but we don't need UN permission to do anything! We had all 16 members voted for the war, we can't do much better! LOL) [...]
There was no UN "vote for war".

[...] This thread isn't about Iraq. Come back when you know what you're talking about. United Nations Security Council Resolution 1441 - Wikipedia [...]
1441 did not authorize the invasion of Iraq.

When pressed on whether he viewed the invasion of Iraq as illegal, he [Kofi Annan] said: "Yes, if you wish. I have indicated it was not in conformity with the UN charter from our point of view, from the charter point of view, it was illegal."

BBC NEWS | Middle East | Iraq war illegal, says Annan [16.Sep.2004]
Do you know who Kofi Annan is?
 
Israel is asking the USA to attack Iran, or protect their own operation against Iran.

Really? Do we benefit if Iran gets nuclear weapons?

Soon, I expect Israel to say something like "you are either with us..or you're against us".
Perhaps this is an indication that you are goofy.
 
you said I was goofy, not my statement.
Maybe he was talking about that cat. Might want to get him a straw.... ;)


JKfCN.jpg
 
you said I was goofy, not my statement.
Let's review. Here is what you said, "Soon, I expect Israel to say something like 'you are either with us..or you're against us'."

Goofy. Yes? You know it is. Therefore, you are likely to be.
 
No, don't burn a couple hundred million on a free bunker buster for Israel that probably wont work.
 
Back
Top Bottom