United Nations Security Council and the Iraq War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I won't be reporting your own personal attacks. That's not how I roll.
Let the mods decide who fired the first shot.
It was never VOTED ON, how the hell could it have been vetoed??? You can't say the UN did something when the UN resolution about the war directly was withdrawn and not put up for a vote. We don't know what WOULD have happened, but it was not vetoed. Your foot is so deep in your mouth at this point......This proposed resolution was subsequently withdrawn when it became clear that several permanent members of the Council would cast no votes on any new resolution, thereby vetoing it.
I restate the obvious, they voted 15-0 in favor of 1441.....ya know what, this thread isn't about Iraq.
So yea, please show me where in the NPT it says that the USA MUST disarm? It doesn't say that. It says the GOAL is disarmament. You can't just say "it says it" without proof. I've shown lots of proof. You and your buddy here have shown nothing.
More proof: (actual wording of the NPT)
UNODA - Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT)Declaring their intention to achieve at the earliest possible date the cessation of the nuclear arms race and to undertake effective measures in the direction of nuclear disarmament,
So yea, I'll take your bet, and I already won. That is directly from the treaty itself. It does not MANDATE nuclear disarmament. it says in the DIRECTION OF disarmament. And we have been reducing our stockpiles for decades. So we are in full compliance.
So what do I win?
Last edited by dontworrybehappy; 03-15-12 at 11:06 AM.
Pretty suggestive, really. I don't believe the mods would fail to get the gist of who you were referring to....one thing that bozo who keeps attacking me has not done is produce any proof, but a website on wiki stating that the UN didn't vote on anything about war in Iraq. Apparently he didn't even read his own link!!