- Joined
- Aug 27, 2005
- Messages
- 43,602
- Reaction score
- 26,256
- Location
- Houston, TX
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Which is cheaper?
1) Taxpayers forced to pay for abortions?
OR
2) Not paying for abortions, but forcing the woman to carry a fetus to term, which she then abandons, thus throwing the cost of raising the child on the taxpayers?
OR
3) Birth control without copay?
I'll go with birth control. This one is a no-brainer.
1) Taxpayers forced to pay for abortions?
OR
2) Not paying for abortions, but forcing the woman to carry a fetus to term, which she then abandons, thus throwing the cost of raising the child on the taxpayers?
OR
3) Birth control without copay?
I'll go with birth control. This one is a no-brainer.
Last edited: