• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Voter Fraud in the Lone Star State

AdamT

DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 26, 2011
Messages
17,773
Reaction score
5,746
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
I guess I will have to apologize to Republicans! It appears that voter fraud IS a serious issue in this country. Well okay, it actually just seems to be a big problem among evangelicals trying to settle on a not-Mormon candidate. :lamo:lamo:lamo

In back-and-forth emails, Protestant fundamentalist leaders who attended — most of them backing former House Speaker Newt Gingrich to be the anti-Romney candidate — are accusing Catholic participants of conniving to rig the vote. They said they were conned into leaving after the second ballot on Saturday. They said pro-Santorum participants held a third ballot which Mr. Santorum won with more than 70 percent of the vote — far higher than the nine-vote margin he won on the first ballot.

....Now, a prominent evangelical political organizer is saying to others confidentially he has evidence that in a least one instance a participant was seen writing Mr. Santorum’s name on four separate ballots and putting them in the ballot box.

Voter Fraud in the Lone Star State | Mother Jones
 
Mother Jones? Really?

Nothing but empty ad hominem? Seriously?

Did you not get that the quoted text came from the ultra-conservative Washington Times? Think you could get through it and actually have something to say if it was instead quoted by a right wing site? Evangelical Ballot Stuffing
 
I'm sorry. Was this a vote for delegates? For the primary? In any way related to a legitimate, legally recognized vote for the placement of a candidate in a political office? Or was this just a procedural vote amongst religious leaders to decide endorsements/candidate preference amongst a specific demographic?

This is the equivalent of citing voter fraud in a friggin' Homecoming Court election. It has nothing to do with the issues of voter fraud that are of concern: Those pertaining to the direct election of national or state representatives.
 
I'm sorry. Was this a vote for delegates? For the primary? In any way related to a legitimate, legally recognized vote for the placement of a candidate in a political office? Or was this just a procedural vote amongst religious leaders to decide endorsements/candidate preference amongst a specific demographic?

This is the equivalent of citing voter fraud in a friggin' Homecoming Court election. It has nothing to do with the issues of voter fraud that are of concern: Those pertaining to the direct election of national or state representatives.

You picked that up, did you? :thumbs:

Of course it's just funny that the holy rollers get together to settle on one candidate to carry their banner of religious morality ... and end up in a cat fight accusing each other of rigging the vote. I don't care who you are -- that's funny.
 
Nothing but empty ad hominem? Seriously?

Did you not get that the quoted text came from the ultra-conservative Washington Times? Think you could get through it and actually have something to say if it was instead quoted by a right wing site? Evangelical Ballot Stuffing

If you think that is a right wing site.... JUST WOW>

You've Got Questions ... We've Got Answers

What is The American Prospect?
The Prospect is a monthly print and online political magazine based in Washington, D.C.

What's your bent?
We're liberal, progressive, lefty—call it what you want, we're proud of it.

Why do you hate America?
We don't.

What's it mean to be a liberal magazine?
Good question. It doesn't mean all our contributors agree with each other, but we do share a broad commitment to working toward a society in which everyone gets a fair shot and is treated equally and with respect by our institutions. If you put our vision on a bumper sticker, it would read: Hey, We're in This Together or—according to our fans on Facebook—Hey, We Actually Care About People! You can read more about who we are here.

When was the Prospect founded?
1990

By whom?
Robert Kuttner, Paul Starr, and Robert Reich.

Why another liberal magazine?
When the Prospect was founded in 1990, conservatism—buoyed by a decade of Republican rule—was ascendent; under Reagan, income inequality ballooned. The founders felt that there was not a progressive publication focused on economic issues that was as interested in policy as it was politics. Since then, we've expanded our coverage to address broader issues of social justice—immigration, gay rights, women's rights. But we're still here 20 years later, smack dab at the nexus of politics and policy.

How can you be objective if you're liberal?
Our idea of journalism is different from the mainstream media's. We don't subscribe to the simple notion that IDEA + OPPOSITE IDEA = OBJECTIVITY. We get the numbers and the historical facts right, but we acknowledge that we bring a particular worldview to our work.

We try our best to represent conservative ideas fairly, even if we disagree with them, but you'll also notice our contributors often disagree most fiercely with each other. You won't see us arguing about whether or not someone without insurance deserves health care, but you will find us duking it out over the best way of providing it.
About Us
 
They were simply following the advice that God help those who help themselves.
 
If you think that is a right wing site.... JUST WOW>


About Us

My bad, I was confusing them with American Thinker. In any case, the quote came from the Washington Times. Are you going to deny that that's a right wing paper?
 
My bad, I was confusing them with American Thinker. In any case, the quote came from the Washington Times. Are you going to deny that that's a right wing paper?

I could care less where it's from, some evangelicals being nitwits for what? A church function voting thing playing stupid games means what to whom? People like you, that can't get your sources straight and post blather from Mother Jones seem to care, everyone else just yawns.


/YAWN
 
They were simply following the advice that God help those who help themselves.
Yeah, and liberals are the one's who demand that those who help themselves help those who are too stupid or lazy to help themselves, who, surprise, are almost always liberals!
 
I could care less where it's from, some evangelicals being nitwits for what? A church function voting thing playing stupid games means what to whom? People like you, that can't get your sources straight and post blather from Mother Jones seem to care, everyone else just yawns.


/YAWN

Wow, really? Your whole rant, and another thread, concerned nothing but where the quote was from, and now you're trying to pulls this gigaflipflop? :2rofll:
 
If you think that is a right wing site.... JUST WOW>


About Us

he pointed you toward the washington times as the cited (conservative) news source

apparently you missed that. by choice of happenstance, only you know
 
Back
Top Bottom