• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

U.S. Marines Urinate On Dead Bodies In Afghanistan

Using that logic, you can justify any illegal act by pointing and saying "Well they do worse". The Marine Corp knows this which is why the Marine Corp denounced the act as being against what the Marine Corp expects of it's Marines.

As much as you hate to see it, it was wrong.

So to you raping children is the same as pissing on the corpse of terrorists.....
 
Using that logic, you can justify any illegal act by pointing and saying "Well they do worse". The Marine Corp knows this which is why the Marine Corp denounced the act as being against what the Marine Corp expects of it's Marines.

As much as you hate to see it, it was wrong.

Why is peeing on a body wrong but putting holes in the body with bullets OK?

I seriously don't understand the logic behind those thinking that what they did was "dishonorable".
 
Why is peeing on a body wrong but putting holes in the body with bullets OK?

I seriously don't understand the logic behind those thinking that what they did was "dishonorable".

Exactly if your going to kill her anyway why not rape her first. Killing is worse than rape. Your logic is flawless.
 
Who here agrees we should shoot this thread and then pee on it? :mrgreen:
 
Exactly if your going to kill her anyway why not rape her first. Killing is worse than rape. Your logic is flawless.

So you are going with the two wrongs way of thinking? See a problem with that yet? I doubt it...
 
Who here agrees we should shoot this thread and then pee on it? :mrgreen:


I like and value my computer too much...
 
So you are going with the two wrongs way of thinking? See a problem with that yet? I doubt it...

Hey we are killing her and peeing on her anyway why is it wrong to rape her? It's war man.
 
Hey we are killing her and peeing on her anyway why is it wrong to rape her? It's war man.

Yeah... I didn't think that you understood. All good buddy.
 
Yeah... I didn't think that you understood. All good buddy.

I understand very well. If we are killing them anyway that justifies anything else we do. Whether its corpse desecration or using them to release some sexual frustration. Who cares they are terrorists anyway.

It could help moral as then female U.S. soldiers are less likely to get raped.
 
I understand very well. If we are killing them anyway that justifies anything else we do. Whether its corpse desecration or using them to release some sexual frustration. Who cares they are terrorists anyway.

It could help moral as then female U.S. soldiers are less likely to get raped.

Wrong. It does not justify anything else that we do.

Killing in war is legal.

I have read a few state laws about corpse desecration and can't find anything about urinating on the body as being illegal.

Rape? That is illegal. And even if urinating on the corpse is illegal, you again have the conflicting idea that it is ok to shoot the person, just not to pee on the person.
 
So there are SOME things you wouldn't do? I wouldn't do it with yours, let alone mine. I value my self-respect too much.

I don't understand what you are implying here...
 
Wrong. It does not justify anything else that we do.

Killing in war is legal.

I have read a few state laws about corpse desecration and can't find anything about urinating on the body as being illegal.

Rape? That is illegal. And even if urinating on the corpse is illegal, you again have the conflicting idea that it is ok to shoot the person, just not to pee on the person.

Oh so your saying the Marines were wrong to pee in the corpse.
 
See since we are going to kill them might as well have fun while doing it. Those marines have needs so its ok to rape the terrorists first.

So you don't really have much of an argument then? Fine. Nothing illegal about behaviour and certainly nothing worthy of being dishonorable. Cool.
 
So you don't really have much of an argument then? Fine. Nothing illegal about behaviour and certainly nothing worthy of being dishonorable. Cool.

Hey if we are going to kill them anyway and they are terrorists then it just doesn't matter. Rape, corpse desecration, whatever, its all cool. That's all I am hearing. Go for it boys, and girls. The pics of the white girl at abu grab were awesome. If we don't care about decency all instances then decency doesn't exist.
 
Hey if we are going to kill them anyway and they are terrorists then it just doesn't matter. Rape, corpse desecration, whatever, its all cool. That's all I am hearing. Go for it boys, and girls. The pics of the white girl at abu grab were awesome. If we don't care about decency all instances then decency doesn't exist.

Nice to know you're sinking to the level of the terrorists.
Tell me, are you really just a hormone-charged kid? If you're not, your behavior demonstrates that you have some sick ideas and have no idea what war is like.
 
Hey if we are going to kill them anyway and they are terrorists then it just doesn't matter. Rape, corpse desecration, whatever, its all cool. That's all I am hearing. Go for it boys, and girls. The pics of the white girl at abu grab were awesome. If we don't care about decency all instances then decency doesn't exist.

Unless you can actually maintain a valid debate stance then I don't see any point in "debating" you further. Why manc is thanking you is beyond comprehension.
 
Nice to know you're sinking to the level of the terrorists.
Tell me, are you really just a hormone-charged kid? If you're not, your behavior demonstrates that you have some sick ideas and have no idea what war is like.

War is hell I get it. That's why the people say the desecration of the corpses was ok. They were terrorists, war is hell, and killing them was worse and we kill in war.
So if we can use those to justify one thing we can use them to justify other things too. Like a little sexual recreation. It's war and their terrorists and we are going to kill them anyway. If it offends them it doesn't matter they do the same thing. So if they can rape Laura Logan we can rape them. See how that works.
 
War is hell I get it. That's why the people say the desecration of the corpses was ok. They were terrorists, war is hell, and killing them was worse and we kill in war.
So if we can use those to justify one thing we can use them to justify other things too. Like a little sexual recreation. It's war and their terrorists and we are going to kill them anyway. If it offends them it doesn't matter they do the same thing. So if they can rape Laura Logan we can rape them. See how that works.

:lamo:lamo
Obviously you have no idea of war. If you think wars should be fought as savagely as you think, then I guess you wouldn't have problems with the Nazis and the Soviets in their wars.
War is hell, **** to anybody who says otherwise, but that's no excuse for every rule, every etiquette, every conduct to be thrown away.
:doh
 
Where did I say he isn't ALLOWED to criticize anyone? I just said that his comment of saying that people disagreeing with pissing on dead bodies is "aiding and abetting the enemy" is wrong.

Do you need hoooked on phonics or something?

calling free speech aiding and abetting the enemy is just plain stupid.

1. It is possible for free speech to be aiding and abetting the enemy.
2. He can say whatever he wants... free speech! haha

As I noted before. Just because speech is free does not place it beyond reproach.

Your point was asinine (as if free speech cannot be treasonous), ironic (as you wished to limit his free speech) and fail (please don't ask me to explain it again, I shan't).


One more thing. It's funnier (and more deeply ironic) because you were calling what he did stupid.


Regarding the 'hooked on phonics', I'm sure my education level (Phd) far exceeds yours. So if anyone needs to go to school, it's you - and that's MORE irony!


hah



ps. Why is kenvin going on about rape?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom