• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Just Plain Wrong

Sure, but you're saying all selfish views are equal and that's not the case.

No. Bias makes some beliefs appear selfish, and others not so. Thus, all beliefs are selfish, or all beliefs are not selfish. There must be absolutes in order to erase the obfuscation of bias.

Indeed, if you use your child to spread ANY belief, and that child has no idea what it is, from communism to capitalism, then it is selfish and wrong.

Here. Let's have an example. With all due respect, you are "very liberal."

According to your pov, will you list any political views that are not selfish, and which ones are?
 
According to your pov, will you list any political views that are not selfish, and which ones are?

It has nothing to do with selfish and not selfish. Your question equated using your child to regurgitate hate speech as the same as what this mother did. I pointed out that's not true.

So if you told your kid to stand up for prayer in class even though they didn't want to (in your words exploitation) it's equivilent to having your kid stand up for beleifs in racial superiority? That the two are equal because of the parental coercien?
 
It has nothing to do with selfish and not selfish. Your question equated using your child to regurgitate hate speech as the same as what this mother did. I pointed out that's not true.

So if you told your kid to stand up for prayer in class even though they didn't want to (in your words exploitation) it's equivilent to having your kid stand up for beleifs in racial superiority? That the two are equal because of the parental coercien?

Basically it's exploitation, just not that bad?

Sent from my ADR6300 using Tapatalk
 
Agreed. Though, some liberals would have you believe that the child full understood what he was doing, and did so willfully.

And some conservatives would like you to believe they can read minds.
 
And some conservatives would like you to believe they can read minds.

Well, most of them claim to have a direct line to God, so maybe they can.
 
It is using a child to voice YOUR selfish views.

I don't personally consider wanting equal treatment to be selfish.
 
The subject of the thread that I "started" concerned a shy timid little boy and the selfish actions of his uncaring mother.

But, I should have known that the homosexual radicals jump on any opportunity to legitimize immorality and promote their agenda.

So in that context___I'm guilty as charged.
Some libertarian you are.
 
Some libertarian you are.

Apparently one of those 'convenient' Libertarians. If it's convenient for her to believe in Libertarian positions, she will. However, if it isn't, she won't.
 
Bachmann's not to blame for that mother's decisions. I agree that the little boy wasn't "traumatized," but he was exploited by his parent, not by the candidate.

Um, okay, but Bachmann's still the asshole.
 
My mommy's gay???:lamo

But mommy, if you're gay then how was I conceived?
 
On purpose. Unlike many kids who have straight parents who are just accidents.

I wasn't paying attention the other day while driving to work and I got laid. :lol:
 
And some conservatives would like you to believe they can read minds.
Well, most of them claim to have a direct line to God, so maybe they can.
It is not neccessary to be psychic or spiritually connected to see that the shy timid little boy is obviously uncomfortable about the awkward situation his mother has placed him after considering that type B personalities rarely place themselves in such positions.

It's called "Common Sense"__Google it!
 
It is not neccessary to be psychic or spiritually connected to see that the shy timid little boy is obviously uncomfortable about the awkward situation his mother has placed him after considering that type B personalities rarely place themselves in such positions.

It's called "Common Sense"__Google it!

Her crazy eyes would intimidate any child.
 
Her crazy eyes would intimidate any child.
As far as I know, Michelle Bachmann is a loving mother of 4 children, who unselfishly opened her home to 23 foster children in distress untill each of them could find a home or safely returned to their families.

You prefer filth to cleanliness__The gutter to the walk__You not only condone but celebrate immorality while condeming morality and judge the good as being evil for their intolerance of perversion and simply trying to make the world a better place.

What have you done lately?!
 
As far as I know, Michelle Bachmann is a loving mother of 4 children, who unselfishly opened her home to 23 foster children in distress untill each of them could find a home or safely returned to their families.
Good for her. That doesn't necessarily have anything to do with her political lean.

You prefer filth to cleanliness__The gutter to the walk__You not only condone but celebrate immorality while condeming morality and judge the good as being evil for their intolerance of perversion and simply trying to make the world a better place.
Tell that to a gay person.
 
Good for her. That doesn't necessarily have anything to do with her political lean.
I was making a defensive comment of an unrelated matter to an offensive comment of an unrelated matter.

I thought that was obvious__Pay attention Madlib__I don't have time to hold your hand and walk you through every post.

Tell that to a gay person.
You tell them___They don't concern me.
 
As far as I know, Michelle Bachmann is a loving mother of 4 children, who unselfishly opened her home to 23 foster children in distress untill each of them could find a home or safely returned to their families.

You prefer filth to cleanliness__The gutter to the walk__You not only condone but celebrate immorality while condeming morality and judge the good as being evil for their intolerance of perversion and simply trying to make the world a better place.

What have you done lately?!

It is your perversion of morality that I condemn.

Some libertarian you are.

Libertarian that condones legislation of morality. AKA a Republican.
 
Last edited:
You tell them___They don't concern me.

Of course they don't. That of course explains why you have pitched both a fit and a tent in this thread. Seriously, you have a very bad habit of buying your own BS.
 
It is not neccessary to be psychic or spiritually connected to see that the shy timid little boy is obviously uncomfortable about the awkward situation his mother has placed him after considering that type B personalities rarely place themselves in such positions.

It's called "Common Sense"__Google it!

I Googled Empirica and common sense. This is what I got.

The answer is
 
As far as I know, Michelle Bachmann is a loving mother of 4 children, who unselfishly opened her home to 23 foster children in distress untill each of them could find a home or safely returned to their families.

You prefer filth to cleanliness__The gutter to the walk__You not only condone but celebrate immorality while condeming morality and judge the good as being evil for their intolerance of perversion and simply trying to make the world a better place.

What have you done lately?!

I told a five year old his mommy was going to Hell if he didn't shut up and let me eat my meal in peace.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom