• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

WH rejects subpoena request for Solyndra Docs

From the linked article
""I can only conclude that your decision to issue a subpoena, authorized by a party-line vote, was driven more by partisan politics than a legitimate effort to conduct a responsible investigation," Obama's counsel, Kathryn Ruemmler".

So the WO is playing the partisan politic card. I hope voters will remember this. My way of thinking, if you have nothing to hide, did nothing wrong, give them the documents and say, see I told you so.
 
Dickieboy said:
What happend to Mr. Transparency?
Click to expand...
No kidding.

mike2810 said:
From the linked article
""I can only conclude that your decision to issue a subpoena, authorized by a party-line vote, was driven more by partisan politics than a legitimate effort to conduct a responsible investigation," Obama's counsel, Kathryn Ruemmler".
Click to expand...
Even if so... so what? It's not critical national security, so the public has a right to know. Now shut up and provide the information.
 
I'm sure it doesn't bother Obama to be in contempt of Congress...he's already been in contempt of two court, after all.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom