- Joined
- Jun 7, 2011
- Messages
- 1,405
- Reaction score
- 355
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
fyi the story she is talking about is this one
State firm's cash to Herman Cain may breach federal campaign, tax laws - JSOnline
That should be the standard line of pretty much everyone born after 1945. Yes...once or twice...or 100...why?The best quote about past drug use is one I've heard attributed to Newt Gingrich. Asked about marijuana use, he said, "Sure, I did it once or twice. It was 1969 and I was in grad schoo."
No...they revolved around 'hope' and 'change'. Helped he was a "clean articulate well spoken black man for a change".Obama's debate performances didn't revolve around fairytale tax plans that would never actually come to fruition.
During Herman Cain’s tenure as the head of the National Restaurant Association in the 1990s
The desperation to find something to smear him with has hit new lows. It will be completely dismissed.
I doubt it.
The problem is that the settlement he paid to the victims--a mere 5-figure dollar amount--is not large enough to appear as though he was trying to hide something. Sounds more like he just didn't want the hassle of a trial.
In May, Cain told The Washington Examiner, “They're going to come after me more viciously than they would a white candidate. ... And so, to use Clarence Thomas as an example, I'm ready for the same high-tech lynching that he went through — for the good of this country.”
You mean, like the desperation people had trying to smear Obama with things like Rev. Wright and Will Ayers? Or are those thing legit because it was a Democrat in the crosshairs?
And if the suits had just been filed yesterday, some Cain supporters would probably say they were improperly motivated.During Herman Cain’s tenure as the head of the National Restaurant Association in the 1990s
The desperation to find something to smear him with has hit new lows. It will be completely dismissed.
I'm noticing a trend here with some Conservative poster...deflecting the allegations against Herman Cain as if the women had ulterior motives. But what if the allegations are true? Consider what's being reported for a moment:
- Two women paid in the 10's of thousands to settle their sexual harrassment cases out of court.
- Both women placed under gag order not to discuss the case after settlement was reached.
- Herman Cain denying he ever "sexually harrassed anyone", but the allegation Politico.com has reported wasn't for sexual harrassment; they're for "inappropriate [sexual] behavior" which is alittle different. Apples and oranges?...perhaps.
And then there's this statement he made back in May of this year well inadvance of these allegations going public likening the charge as being similar to what Justice Thomas went through during his Supreme Court confirmation:
Could it be he knew this story would eventually go public and he's been sitting back waiting for it since then? Okay, so that's alittle far-fetched since the Washington Examiner story was really about his adversaries playing the race card, but still...it's something that makes you go...
Hmmm...
Illogical argument 101: Pretend that smearing a presidential candidate is about race while ignoring that this what Republicans and Democrats do to each other every election.Libtard journalism in 2011 ...... write a story that smears a black man because he is conservative, present no facts, admit you are not going to give any actual details .... and then say its up to the smeared guy to disprove what you wrote. F'in unbelievable.
Politico's Martin: "We're Just Not Going To Get Into The Details Of Exactly What Happened" | RealClearPolitics
Illogical argument 101: Pretend that smearing a presidential candidate is about race while ignoring that this what Republicans and Democrats do to each other every election.
And they say liberals play the race card.
Yeah, the holier than thou attitude is always a bit astounding to me.It always makes me laugh when one side all of a sudden gets up in arms about something that the other side has done.... and talks about how horrible it is all the while knowing that they did the exact same thing last go around. They all play the race card and they all use the dirtiest tricks they can come up with to smear the other side. Wonder how long it will take people from both sides of the isle to admit this and move forward?
Illogical argument 101: Pretend that smearing a presidential candidate is about race while ignoring that this what Republicans and Democrats do to each other every election.
And they say liberals play the race card.
................
And Dunn just blew the issue wide open to Ron Suskind, Mike Allen reports:
"'The president has a real woman problem' was the assessment of another high-ranking female official. 'The idea of the boys' club being just Larry and Rahm isn't fair. He [Obama] was just as responsible himself.' ... '[L]ooking back,' recalled Anita Dunn, when asked about it nearly two years later, 'this place would be in court for a hostile workplace ... Because it actually fit all of the classic legal requirements for a genuinely hostile workplace to women.'"
prove it.This a racial attack on Cain for not staying on the liberal plantation ..... period.
This a racial attack on Cain for not staying on the liberal plantation ..... period.
Hahaha. I hope everybody calls it this from now on.conservativeguy, it's not the liberals' fault that the GOP puts forth poor candidates. Especially when it comes to women and minorities. Cain's Sim City plan is not feasible. He has said some stupid things. Add Palin, O'Donnell, and Bachman to this list and you'll see what I mean.
prove it.
........
How can you rest something you don't have?I rest my case.