If your sole purpose in posting is to denounce the movement, feel free I suppose. However, I think you'd be better off trying to understand these people and see things from their perspective. As I've said before when speaking of the movement, it's not that these people are anti-capitalist but rather that they are anti-corruption. And a large part of the corruption has come through the banking system. To understand it, you have to understand that our entire economic policy for nearly 30 years has been based on financial services - consumption - primarily with the focus on our homes, i.e., how we furnish them, repair them, use them as "revolving credit". Of course, the other side has long been how we as a nation have come to rely so heavily on credit. As such, banks have taken advantage of this "national consumption based on credit" and a large part of that deals with bank transaction fees each time you use your credit or debit card. Why do you think the banks are scrambling now to raise money through retail purchases on debit/credit cards but are so willing not to charge their members for using their ATM machines? Why are they not placing limits on the amounts people keep in their checking or savings account and charging their customers if they fall below that limit? Granted, such limits usually were low - $500-$1,000 - but lately you've had banks increase that limit to $3,000 or more.
I think it was Mellie who made the point that these new fees would only hurt people who had savings/checking accounts below...5-figures. She makes a good point. However, remove enough of the common man's money out of the banking system in one foul swoop and you effectively hurt the financial system.
Never under estimate the leveraging power of the majority.