• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Herman Cain has written 113 columns for leading birther website

Until Obama comes up with a real Birth Certificate some will continue to question his birth place.

The last Certificate was shown to be a fake, but the Media ignored it because of all the ridicule from the Liberals.

At this point I don't care I only want to make sure the questions end with his removal from office in the 2012 election along with as many Liberals as possible.

There is no doubt whatsoever, that a valid Birth Certificate was provided, met with the election committees approval per the Constitution. Zero doubt. Anyone clinging to such birther nonsense deserves to be ridiculed and outed for the fruitloops they are, along with the "truthers".
 
If you defended Obama over Jeremy Wright

Horrible comparison Captain. Unless WND was a 20 year mentor and close personal friend to Herman Cain.

Bill Ayers, yes...perhaps a bit more accurate. But there is definitely a way to have issues with Obama regarding Jeremy Wright that was not simply guilt by association.

A more proper example would be those who condemned the Democrats for Al-Qaeda coming out in support of something they've said before, suggesting that somehow because Al-Qaeda agree's the democrats must be in line with terrorists. That'd be a more accurate "guilt by association" type situation.
 
Although did past presidents have to give in there birth certificates? If not, why he had to be single out?

McCain had to prove he was actually a U.S. citizen. That said, I understand the point and my only point is that someone running for president should have to at the very least meet the same requirements that I do to get a job.
 
Dishonest article. Completely and totally. Guilt by association doesn't fly. My guess is that the OP posted this as a way to check for hypocrisy from both sides. If you defended Obama over Jeremy Wright or Bill Ayers, are you also defending Cain, now? Or if you attacked Obama, are you also attacking Cain? If you answered "Yes" to either question, that you have passed the hypocrisy checkpoint. If you did not, then you have not.

Obama said that Wright was his spiritual advisor. If you can show where WND was anything more than a paper that picked up Cain's syndicated column, you then might have a point.
 
Until Obama comes up with a real Birth Certificate some will continue to question his birth place.

The last Certificate was shown to be a fake, but the Media ignored it because of all the ridicule from the Liberals.

Unbiased link to substantiate this?
 

So Cain mixed up the country abroad that Obama was partially raised in and when corrected acknowledged the correction rather than arguing some idiotic birther point, and never once in the entire thing suggested Obama wasn't American or that he was actually KENYAN. Making a stupid mistake does not equal being a birther. Suggesting that Obama was raised outside the country does not equal suggesting he was born outside the country and is not a citizen which is what birtherism is about.
 
So basically, you don't have ****, and this is a nothing thread.

A Herman Cain Presidency with his 999 plan would be an absolute night mare for this countries middle class, elderly and poor. You can bet that the other republican nominees have looked at his plan and know exactly what it would do the economy but have chosen not to use what they know to go after Cain
 
So Cain mixed up the country abroad that Obama was partially raised in and when corrected acknowledged the correction rather than arguing some idiotic birther point, and never once in the entire thing suggested Obama wasn't American or that he was actually KENYAN. Making a stupid mistake does not equal being a birther. Suggesting that Obama was raised outside the country does not equal suggesting he was born outside the country and is not a citizen which is what birtherism is about.

Herman Cain's with birther Donald Trump - Juana Summers - POLITICO.com
 
Yep, already posted and the closest thing to it that he's done. A stand point that I think is retarded...IE respecting birthers in any way....but he also clearly states:

"it's just not an issue that I have studied enough to have a view one way or the other."

At best Cain was a guy who had no real opinion on the birther issue and didn't really look into it much and wanted to avoid angering possible constituents while at the same time keeping himself separated from it. Cain's an unskilled and unpracticed politician, he's not a birther.
 
I was willing to give him a chance til I found out his real views on abortion and gay rights:(

I will say I like some of the ideas on his 999 plan though.

Oh and when I saw him saying that if you are poor and jobless that it is your own fault and not the fault of the banks? It made me sick. This man is out of touch with the real folks.
 
Last edited:
Dishonest article. Completely and totally. Guilt by association doesn't fly. My guess is that the OP posted this as a way to check for hypocrisy from both sides. If you defended Obama over Jeremy Wright or Bill Ayers, are you also defending Cain, now? Or if you attacked Obama, are you also attacking Cain? If you answered "Yes" to either question, that you have passed the hypocrisy checkpoint. If you did not, then you have not.

Can I defend Cain by attacking Obama?
 
I was willing to give him a chance til I found out his real views on abortion and gay rights:(

I will say I like some of the ideas on his 999 plan though.

Oh and when I saw him saying that if you are poor and jobless that it is your own fault and not the fault of the banks? It made me sick. This man is out of touch with the real folks.

Did you actually expect a conservative to embrace abortion and gay marriage ???

Do you really believe its the bank's fault that many people don't have jobs ????? REALLY ????
 
Did you actually expect a conservative to embrace abortion and gay marriage ???


Really Gill, no one embraces abortion. Even those who are pro-choice, see abortion as a route of last resort. And yes, there are a lot of fiscal conservatives that are also pro-choice and pro gay marriage. Are you sure you are not confusing the term conservative with evangelical?
 
Yep, already posted and the closest thing to it that he's done. A stand point that I think is retarded...IE respecting birthers in any way....but he also clearly states:

"it's just not an issue that I have studied enough to have a view one way or the other."

At best Cain was a guy who had no real opinion on the birther issue and didn't really look into it much and wanted to avoid angering possible constituents while at the same time keeping himself separated from it. Cain's an unskilled and unpracticed politician, he's not a birther.

So do you think that Herman Cain believes that the RNC would really let a person run for President who was not eligible? Cain was feeding the fire and knew it
"He's not off base," Cain said then of Donald Trump's effort to get Obama to release his birth certificate. "Just like the people who have been challenging his place of birth for the past couple of years. It's just not an issue that I have studied enough to have a view one way or the other. ... I respect people who believe that he should prove his citizenship, that he should prove that he was born in the United States of America, and that's fine. If I were president, and someone would challenge me on that, I'd produce my birth certificate. End of discussion. . . . But I quite frankly haven't looked at all the facts to have an opinion on that."
 
Last edited:
Really Gill, no one embraces abortion. Even those who are pro-choice, see abortion as a route of last resort.

The typical Tea Party conservative does not embrace "legalization" of abortion. But you knew what I was saying.

And yes, there are a lot of fiscal conservatives that are also pro-choice and pro gay marriage.

I'm well aware of that since I am one (with restrictions).
 
Back
Top Bottom